Examining the Convergent Validity and Known-Groups Validity of Two Children's Self-Report Physical Literacy Scales.

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS

Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1080/01942638.2025.2519912

Olivia Valentine, Ted Brown, Mong-Lin Yu

{"title":"Examining the Convergent Validity and Known-Groups Validity of Two Children's Self-Report Physical Literacy Scales.","authors":"Olivia Valentine, Ted Brown, Mong-Lin Yu","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2519912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To examine the convergent validity and known-groups validity of the two children's self-report physical literacy (PL) scales.Methods: Twenty-eight neurotypical children aged 8-to-12-years completed the Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth Self (PLAYself) and the Physical Literacy for Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest). Spearman's rho correlations were used to examine the convergent validity of the PLAYself and PL-C Quest, and independent t-tests were conducted to evaluate the known-groups validity by comparing boys' and girls' self-reported PL scores.Results: Multiple statistically significant correlations were found between the PL-C Quest and PLAYself subscales, including a positive correlation between the Total Percentage scores of each scale (rho = .56, p < .01). Additionally, one statistically significant difference was found between girls (M = 227.13, SD = 54.83) and boys (M = 177.75, SD = 55.76) on the self-reported PLAYself Relative Rankings - Literacy subscale score, t(1) = 2.34, p = .03.Conclusions: The PLAYself and PL-C Quest exhibited several significant correlations, supporting their convergent validity. However, only limited evidence of known-groups validity was provided with only one significant difference between the two child-reported PL scales. These results suggest a need for further research to explore alternative factors influencing children's PL.","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2519912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine the convergent validity and known-groups validity of the two children's self-report physical literacy (PL) scales.

Methods: Twenty-eight neurotypical children aged 8-to-12-years completed the Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth Self (PLAYself) and the Physical Literacy for Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest). Spearman's rho correlations were used to examine the convergent validity of the PLAYself and PL-C Quest, and independent t-tests were conducted to evaluate the known-groups validity by comparing boys' and girls' self-reported PL scores.

Results: Multiple statistically significant correlations were found between the PL-C Quest and PLAYself subscales, including a positive correlation between the Total Percentage scores of each scale (rho = .56, p < .01). Additionally, one statistically significant difference was found between girls (M = 227.13, SD = 54.83) and boys (M = 177.75, SD = 55.76) on the self-reported PLAYself Relative Rankings - Literacy subscale score, t(1) = 2.34, p = .03.

Conclusions: The PLAYself and PL-C Quest exhibited several significant correlations, supporting their convergent validity. However, only limited evidence of known-groups validity was provided with only one significant difference between the two child-reported PL scales. These results suggest a need for further research to explore alternative factors influencing children's PL.

查看原文本刊更多论文

两种儿童身体读写自我报告量表的收敛效度和已知组效度检验。

目的：检验两种儿童身体素养自述量表的收敛效度和已知组效度。方法：28名8 ~ 12岁的神经正常儿童完成了青少年自我身体素养评估（PLAYself）和儿童身体素养问卷（PL-C Quest）。采用Spearman’s rho相关检验PLAYself和PL- c Quest的收敛效度，并通过比较男孩和女孩自我报告的PL分数进行独立t检验来评估已知组效度。结果：PL-C Quest和PLAYself子量表之间存在多个统计学显著相关，包括各量表Total Percentage得分之间存在正相关（rho = 0.56, p < 0.01）。此外，女孩（M = 227.13, SD = 54.83）和男孩（M = 177.75, SD = 55.76）在自我报告的PLAYself相对排名-识字亚量表得分上存在统计学差异，t(1) = 2.34, p = 0.03。结论：PLAYself和PL-C Quest具有显著的相关性，支持它们的收敛效度。然而，只有有限的证据表明，已知组效度，只有一个显著差异在两个儿童报告的PL量表。这些结果表明，有必要进一步研究影响儿童学习成绩的其他因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-REHABILITATION

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine