Accuracy and Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence and Manual Virtual Segmentation for Generation of 3D Printed Tooth Replicas.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ignacio Pedrinaci, Anita Nasseri, Javier Calatrava, Emilio Couso-Queiruga, William V Giannobile, German O Gallucci, Mariano Sanz
{"title":"Accuracy and Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence and Manual Virtual Segmentation for Generation of 3D Printed Tooth Replicas.","authors":"Ignacio Pedrinaci, Anita Nasseri, Javier Calatrava, Emilio Couso-Queiruga, William V Giannobile, German O Gallucci, Mariano Sanz","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b6329209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The primary aim of this in vitro study was to compare methods for generating 3D-printed replicas through virtual segmentation, utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) or manual processes, by assessing accuracy in terms of volumetric and linear discrepancies. The secondary aims were the assessment of time efficiency with both segmentation methods, and the effect of post-processing on 3D-printed replicas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty teeth were scanned through Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), capturing the region of interest from human subjects. DICOM files underwent virtual segmentation through both AI and manual methods. Replicas were fabricated with a stereolithography 3D printer. After surface scanning of pre-processed replicas and extracted teeth, STL files were superimposed to compare linear and volumetric differences using the extracted teeth as the reference. Post-processed replicas were scanned to assess the effect of post-processing on linear and volumetric changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI-driven segmentation resulted in statistically significant mean linear and volumetric differences of -0.709mm (SD 0.491, P< 0.001) and -4.70%, respectively. Manual segmentation showed no statistically significant differences in mean linear, -0.463mm (SD 0.335, P<0.001) and volumetric (-1.20%) measures. Comparing manual and AI-driven segmentations, AI-driven segmentation displayed mean linear and volumetric differences of -0.329mm (SD 0.566, p=0.003) and -2.23%, respectively. Additionally, AI segmentation reduced the mean time by 21.8 minutes. When comparing post-processed to pre-processed replicas, there was a volumetric reduction of -4.53% and a mean linear difference of -0.151mm (SD 0.564, p=0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both segmentation methods achieved acceptable accuracy, with manual segmentation slightly more accurate but AI-driven segmentation more time-efficient. Continuous improvement in AI offers the potential for increased accuracy, efficiency, and broader application in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b6329209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The primary aim of this in vitro study was to compare methods for generating 3D-printed replicas through virtual segmentation, utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) or manual processes, by assessing accuracy in terms of volumetric and linear discrepancies. The secondary aims were the assessment of time efficiency with both segmentation methods, and the effect of post-processing on 3D-printed replicas.

Methods: Thirty teeth were scanned through Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), capturing the region of interest from human subjects. DICOM files underwent virtual segmentation through both AI and manual methods. Replicas were fabricated with a stereolithography 3D printer. After surface scanning of pre-processed replicas and extracted teeth, STL files were superimposed to compare linear and volumetric differences using the extracted teeth as the reference. Post-processed replicas were scanned to assess the effect of post-processing on linear and volumetric changes.

Results: AI-driven segmentation resulted in statistically significant mean linear and volumetric differences of -0.709mm (SD 0.491, P< 0.001) and -4.70%, respectively. Manual segmentation showed no statistically significant differences in mean linear, -0.463mm (SD 0.335, P<0.001) and volumetric (-1.20%) measures. Comparing manual and AI-driven segmentations, AI-driven segmentation displayed mean linear and volumetric differences of -0.329mm (SD 0.566, p=0.003) and -2.23%, respectively. Additionally, AI segmentation reduced the mean time by 21.8 minutes. When comparing post-processed to pre-processed replicas, there was a volumetric reduction of -4.53% and a mean linear difference of -0.151mm (SD 0.564, p=0.042).

Conclusion: Both segmentation methods achieved acceptable accuracy, with manual segmentation slightly more accurate but AI-driven segmentation more time-efficient. Continuous improvement in AI offers the potential for increased accuracy, efficiency, and broader application in the future.

人工智能和人工虚拟分割生成3D打印牙齿复制品的准确性和效率。
目的:本体外研究的主要目的是通过评估体积和线性差异方面的准确性,比较通过虚拟分割、利用人工智能(AI)或手动过程生成3d打印副本的方法。次要目的是评估两种分割方法的时间效率,以及后处理对3d打印复制品的影响。方法:采用锥形束ct (Cone Beam Computed Tomography, CBCT)扫描30颗牙齿,获取感兴趣区域。通过人工智能和人工方法对DICOM文件进行虚拟分割。复制品是用立体光刻3D打印机制作的。对预处理后的复制品和提取的牙齿进行表面扫描后,以提取的牙齿为参照,叠加STL文件,比较线性和体积差异。扫描后处理的复制品以评估后处理对线性和体积变化的影响。结果:人工智能分割的平均线性和体积差异分别为-0.709mm (SD 0.491, P< 0.001)和-4.70%,具有统计学意义。人工分割的平均线性度为-0.463mm (SD 0.335, p),差异无统计学意义。结论:两种分割方法的准确率均可接受,人工分割的准确率略高,而人工智能分割的时间效率更高。人工智能的持续改进为未来提高准确性、效率和更广泛的应用提供了潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信