Assessing change and establishing empirical cutoffs: the Brief INSPIRE-O measure for personal recovery in mental health services.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Stine Bjerrum Moeller, Pia Veldt Larsen, Stephen F Austin, Mike Slade, Ida-Marie T P Arendt, Lotte Kring, Sebastian Simonsen
{"title":"Assessing change and establishing empirical cutoffs: the Brief INSPIRE-O measure for personal recovery in mental health services.","authors":"Stine Bjerrum Moeller, Pia Veldt Larsen, Stephen F Austin, Mike Slade, Ida-Marie T P Arendt, Lotte Kring, Sebastian Simonsen","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02948-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Personal recovery in mental health services, encouraged by the World Health Organization, has gained significance in research and clinical settings. However, measuring personal recovery remains challenging due to the lack of universally accepted instruments. This study assessed Brief INSPIRE-O's ability to map personal recovery by determining cut-off scores and its ability to detect change in the process of personal recovery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data was from the internet-based monitoring system (IMS) at the Mental Health Service, Capital Region of Denmark. Between 2018 and 2020, 8,192 patients with baseline data on Brief INSPIRE-O were included to assess its role in measuring personal recovery. Additionally, for analyses focusing on Brief-INSPIRE-O as a measure of change in personal recovery, we included 2,714 patients with pre- and post-treatment data.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Brief INSPIRE-O was examined along with well-being (WHO-5) and measures of symptom distress (SCL-10), and functioning (SDS-M).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scores on all measures improved from pre- to post-treatment, except for functional impairment (SDS-M). Convergent validity was established with symptom distress (SCL-10; r = -0.63) and functioning (SDS-M; r = -0.55). A 10-point change in WHO-5 corresponded to an 18.9-point increase in Brief INSPIRE-O. ROC analysis identified an empirical cutoff of 50 for personal recovery and 8 points for clinically relevant change.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Brief INSPIRE-O demonstrated strong validity and sensitivity to change, supporting its use as a reliable tool for assessing personal recovery and treatment quality in clinical practice. It can be considered a relevant brief patient reported outcome measure to be used in international standards of quality and outcome monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02948-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Personal recovery in mental health services, encouraged by the World Health Organization, has gained significance in research and clinical settings. However, measuring personal recovery remains challenging due to the lack of universally accepted instruments. This study assessed Brief INSPIRE-O's ability to map personal recovery by determining cut-off scores and its ability to detect change in the process of personal recovery.

Method: Data was from the internet-based monitoring system (IMS) at the Mental Health Service, Capital Region of Denmark. Between 2018 and 2020, 8,192 patients with baseline data on Brief INSPIRE-O were included to assess its role in measuring personal recovery. Additionally, for analyses focusing on Brief-INSPIRE-O as a measure of change in personal recovery, we included 2,714 patients with pre- and post-treatment data.

Materials: Brief INSPIRE-O was examined along with well-being (WHO-5) and measures of symptom distress (SCL-10), and functioning (SDS-M).

Results: Scores on all measures improved from pre- to post-treatment, except for functional impairment (SDS-M). Convergent validity was established with symptom distress (SCL-10; r = -0.63) and functioning (SDS-M; r = -0.55). A 10-point change in WHO-5 corresponded to an 18.9-point increase in Brief INSPIRE-O. ROC analysis identified an empirical cutoff of 50 for personal recovery and 8 points for clinically relevant change.

Discussion: The Brief INSPIRE-O demonstrated strong validity and sensitivity to change, supporting its use as a reliable tool for assessing personal recovery and treatment quality in clinical practice. It can be considered a relevant brief patient reported outcome measure to be used in international standards of quality and outcome monitoring.

评估变化和建立经验截止点:精神卫生服务中个人康复的简短INSPIRE-O措施。
导言:在世界卫生组织的鼓励下,精神卫生服务中的个人康复在研究和临床环境中具有重要意义。然而,由于缺乏普遍接受的工具,衡量个人恢复仍然具有挑战性。本研究评估了Brief INSPIRE-O通过确定截止分数和检测个人恢复过程中变化的能力来绘制个人恢复的能力。方法:数据来自丹麦首都地区精神卫生服务机构的网络监测系统(IMS)。在2018年至2020年期间,纳入了8192名具有Brief INSPIRE-O基线数据的患者,以评估其在衡量个人康复方面的作用。此外,为了分析Brief-INSPIRE-O作为衡量个人恢复变化的指标,我们纳入了2,714名患者的治疗前后数据。资料:Brief INSPIRE-O与幸福感(who5)、症状困扰(SCL-10)和功能(SDS-M)一起进行了检查。结果:除功能障碍(SDS-M)外,所有指标的评分均较治疗前有所改善。症状困扰(SCL-10;r = -0.63)和功能(SDS-M;R = -0.55)。WHO-5指数变化10点对应于Brief INSPIRE-O指数增加18.9点。ROC分析确定了个人恢复的经验截止点为50分,临床相关变化为8分。讨论:简要的INSPIRE-O表现出很强的有效性和对变化的敏感性,支持其在临床实践中作为评估个人康复和治疗质量的可靠工具。它可以被认为是在质量和结果监测的国际标准中使用的一个相关的简短的病人报告的结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信