Stine Bjerrum Moeller, Pia Veldt Larsen, Stephen F Austin, Mike Slade, Ida-Marie T P Arendt, Lotte Kring, Sebastian Simonsen
{"title":"Assessing change and establishing empirical cutoffs: the Brief INSPIRE-O measure for personal recovery in mental health services.","authors":"Stine Bjerrum Moeller, Pia Veldt Larsen, Stephen F Austin, Mike Slade, Ida-Marie T P Arendt, Lotte Kring, Sebastian Simonsen","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02948-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Personal recovery in mental health services, encouraged by the World Health Organization, has gained significance in research and clinical settings. However, measuring personal recovery remains challenging due to the lack of universally accepted instruments. This study assessed Brief INSPIRE-O's ability to map personal recovery by determining cut-off scores and its ability to detect change in the process of personal recovery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data was from the internet-based monitoring system (IMS) at the Mental Health Service, Capital Region of Denmark. Between 2018 and 2020, 8,192 patients with baseline data on Brief INSPIRE-O were included to assess its role in measuring personal recovery. Additionally, for analyses focusing on Brief-INSPIRE-O as a measure of change in personal recovery, we included 2,714 patients with pre- and post-treatment data.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Brief INSPIRE-O was examined along with well-being (WHO-5) and measures of symptom distress (SCL-10), and functioning (SDS-M).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scores on all measures improved from pre- to post-treatment, except for functional impairment (SDS-M). Convergent validity was established with symptom distress (SCL-10; r = -0.63) and functioning (SDS-M; r = -0.55). A 10-point change in WHO-5 corresponded to an 18.9-point increase in Brief INSPIRE-O. ROC analysis identified an empirical cutoff of 50 for personal recovery and 8 points for clinically relevant change.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Brief INSPIRE-O demonstrated strong validity and sensitivity to change, supporting its use as a reliable tool for assessing personal recovery and treatment quality in clinical practice. It can be considered a relevant brief patient reported outcome measure to be used in international standards of quality and outcome monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02948-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Personal recovery in mental health services, encouraged by the World Health Organization, has gained significance in research and clinical settings. However, measuring personal recovery remains challenging due to the lack of universally accepted instruments. This study assessed Brief INSPIRE-O's ability to map personal recovery by determining cut-off scores and its ability to detect change in the process of personal recovery.
Method: Data was from the internet-based monitoring system (IMS) at the Mental Health Service, Capital Region of Denmark. Between 2018 and 2020, 8,192 patients with baseline data on Brief INSPIRE-O were included to assess its role in measuring personal recovery. Additionally, for analyses focusing on Brief-INSPIRE-O as a measure of change in personal recovery, we included 2,714 patients with pre- and post-treatment data.
Materials: Brief INSPIRE-O was examined along with well-being (WHO-5) and measures of symptom distress (SCL-10), and functioning (SDS-M).
Results: Scores on all measures improved from pre- to post-treatment, except for functional impairment (SDS-M). Convergent validity was established with symptom distress (SCL-10; r = -0.63) and functioning (SDS-M; r = -0.55). A 10-point change in WHO-5 corresponded to an 18.9-point increase in Brief INSPIRE-O. ROC analysis identified an empirical cutoff of 50 for personal recovery and 8 points for clinically relevant change.
Discussion: The Brief INSPIRE-O demonstrated strong validity and sensitivity to change, supporting its use as a reliable tool for assessing personal recovery and treatment quality in clinical practice. It can be considered a relevant brief patient reported outcome measure to be used in international standards of quality and outcome monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.