Chat generative pre-trained transformers era: pros and cons between nursing researchers in Egypt.

IF 3.9 2区医学 Q1 NURSING

BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03332-1

Nafisa Moustafa Abdallah Elpasiony, Elsayed Mahmoud Sabek, Safaa Sayed Mustafa Ibrahim

{"title":"Chat generative pre-trained transformers era: pros and cons between nursing researchers in Egypt.","authors":"Nafisa Moustafa Abdallah Elpasiony, Elsayed Mahmoud Sabek, Safaa Sayed Mustafa Ibrahim","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03332-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An artificial intelligence chatbot called Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformers (ChatGPT) was created by OpenAI. It gained a lot of interest and attention from the scientific and academic sectors since its November 2022 launch.Aim: To identify ChatGPT pros and cons between nursing researchers in Egypt.Methods: A descriptive (cross sectional) research design was conducted on a convenient sample of 1001 nursing researchers from faculties of nursing related to the Supreme Council of Universities. Two tools were used: demographic and technical characteristics, and nursing researchers' opinion questionnaire.Results: The majority of the participants (81.4%) thought that using ChatGPT had significant advantages. However, 44.7% of the cons were disclosed. Almost two-thirds of nursing researchers stated that they are concerned about patient confidentiality (65.6%), that it could lead to incorrect conclusions (68.8%), and that it could have medicolegal repercussions (68.6%). As a result, they are reluctant to use AI chatbots in healthcare decisions (67.8%).Conclusion and recommendations: ChatGPT had benefits but at the same time associated with drawbacks and needs to be used wisely to avoid these drawbacks. Enhance ChatGPT's ability to foster reflective practice to enhance decision-making and critical thinking while bridging the theoretical and practical knowledge gaps in nursing research.","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"667"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03332-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An artificial intelligence chatbot called Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformers (ChatGPT) was created by OpenAI. It gained a lot of interest and attention from the scientific and academic sectors since its November 2022 launch.

Aim: To identify ChatGPT pros and cons between nursing researchers in Egypt.

Methods: A descriptive (cross sectional) research design was conducted on a convenient sample of 1001 nursing researchers from faculties of nursing related to the Supreme Council of Universities. Two tools were used: demographic and technical characteristics, and nursing researchers' opinion questionnaire.

Results: The majority of the participants (81.4%) thought that using ChatGPT had significant advantages. However, 44.7% of the cons were disclosed. Almost two-thirds of nursing researchers stated that they are concerned about patient confidentiality (65.6%), that it could lead to incorrect conclusions (68.8%), and that it could have medicolegal repercussions (68.6%). As a result, they are reluctant to use AI chatbots in healthcare decisions (67.8%).

Conclusion and recommendations: ChatGPT had benefits but at the same time associated with drawbacks and needs to be used wisely to avoid these drawbacks. Enhance ChatGPT's ability to foster reflective practice to enhance decision-making and critical thinking while bridging the theoretical and practical knowledge gaps in nursing research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

聊天生成预训练的变形金刚时代：埃及护理研究人员之间的利弊。

背景：OpenAI开发了一款名为Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformers （ChatGPT）的人工智能聊天机器人。自2022年11月发射以来，它获得了科学界和学术界的极大兴趣和关注。目的：确定埃及护理研究人员之间ChatGPT的优缺点。方法：采用描述性（横断面）研究设计，对1001名来自最高大学理事会护理学院的护理研究人员进行方便抽样。采用两种工具：人口统计学和技术特征，以及护理研究者意见问卷。结果：大多数参与者（81.4%）认为使用ChatGPT具有显著的优势。但被揭发的占44.7%。近三分之二的护理研究人员表示，他们担心患者的隐私（65.6%），这可能导致错误的结论（68.8%），并可能产生医学上的影响（68.6%）。因此，他们不愿意在医疗决策中使用人工智能聊天机器人（67.8%）。结论和建议：ChatGPT有好处，但同时也有缺点，需要明智地使用它来避免这些缺点。加强ChatGPT培养反思性实践的能力，以增强决策和批判性思维，同时弥合护理研究中的理论和实践知识差距。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

6.20%

发文量

317

审稿时长

30 weeks

期刊介绍： BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.