Adapting the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) questionnaire for contextual relevance in Uganda: A comprehensive approach.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2025.10018
Joseph Mugarura, Khamisi Musanje, Michael E Levine, Ronald Asiimwe, Morris Ndeezi, Simon Kizito, Ross G White, Rosco Kasujja
{"title":"Adapting the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) questionnaire for contextual relevance in Uganda: A comprehensive approach.","authors":"Joseph Mugarura, Khamisi Musanje, Michael E Levine, Ronald Asiimwe, Morris Ndeezi, Simon Kizito, Ross G White, Rosco Kasujja","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global utility of acceptance and commitment therapy highlights the need for adapting measures that can effectively capture the richness of psychological flexibility. One such instrument is the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT). We translated the CompACT into Luganda and adapted it for use in Uganda. The original CompACT was translated into the Luganda language and reviewed through a series of evaluations. Nine mental health professionals participated in one-on-one interviews, while a focus group of eight culturally competent laypersons provided further insights. Their feedback resulted in revisions to enhance the instrument's clarity, relevance, acceptability and completeness. The revised version was then cognitively tested with <i>n</i> = 25 trainees at Makerere University. Input from these various groups was synthesized and triangulated to develop the final version. A total of 23 items were adapted to improve the comprehensibility and completeness of the scale. Overall, respondents deemed the tool clear and acceptable. This study highlights the importance of a rigorous adaptation process, including translation, expert review, cognitive testing and feedback triangulation, to ensure psychological measures remain valid and relevant across cultures. Such an approach ensures accuracy in diverse contexts and provides a model for adapting psychological instruments for non-Western populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global utility of acceptance and commitment therapy highlights the need for adapting measures that can effectively capture the richness of psychological flexibility. One such instrument is the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT). We translated the CompACT into Luganda and adapted it for use in Uganda. The original CompACT was translated into the Luganda language and reviewed through a series of evaluations. Nine mental health professionals participated in one-on-one interviews, while a focus group of eight culturally competent laypersons provided further insights. Their feedback resulted in revisions to enhance the instrument's clarity, relevance, acceptability and completeness. The revised version was then cognitively tested with n = 25 trainees at Makerere University. Input from these various groups was synthesized and triangulated to develop the final version. A total of 23 items were adapted to improve the comprehensibility and completeness of the scale. Overall, respondents deemed the tool clear and acceptable. This study highlights the importance of a rigorous adaptation process, including translation, expert review, cognitive testing and feedback triangulation, to ensure psychological measures remain valid and relevant across cultures. Such an approach ensures accuracy in diverse contexts and provides a model for adapting psychological instruments for non-Western populations.

适应接受和承诺治疗过程的综合评估(契约)问卷的上下文相关性在乌干达:一个全面的方法。
接受和承诺疗法的全球应用强调了对能够有效捕捉心理灵活性丰富性的适应性措施的需要。一个这样的工具是接受和承诺治疗过程的综合评估(契约)。我们将《契约》翻译到卢甘达,并将其改编用于乌干达。原《契约》已翻译成卢甘达文,并通过一系列评价加以审查。九名心理健康专业人员参加了一对一的访谈,而由八名具有文化能力的外行组成的焦点小组提供了进一步的见解。他们的反馈导致了修订,以提高文书的清晰度、相关性、可接受性和完整性。修改后的版本随后在马凯雷雷大学接受了n = 25名学员的认知测试。来自这些不同群体的输入被综合和三角化,以开发最终版本。为了提高量表的可理解性和完整性,共修改了23个项目。总体而言,受访者认为该工具清晰且可接受。这项研究强调了严格的适应过程的重要性,包括翻译、专家审查、认知测试和反馈三角测量,以确保心理测量在不同文化中仍然有效和相关。这种方法确保了在不同情况下的准确性,并为非西方人口调整心理工具提供了一个模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信