Socio-demographic and socio-economic differences in the availability of green space in the Netherlands.

IF 3.2 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Population and Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-23 DOI:10.1007/s11111-025-00498-3
Mingwei Liu, Erik J Timmermans, Alfred Wagtendonk, Paul Meijer, Diederick E Grobbee, Ilonca Vaartjes
{"title":"Socio-demographic and socio-economic differences in the availability of green space in the Netherlands.","authors":"Mingwei Liu, Erik J Timmermans, Alfred Wagtendonk, Paul Meijer, Diederick E Grobbee, Ilonca Vaartjes","doi":"10.1007/s11111-025-00498-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to map the spatial distribution of green space in the Netherlands, and to first comprehensively assess socio-demographic and socio-economic differences in the availability of green space in the Netherlands. Data was analyzed from all registered residents of the Netherlands aged one and above on January 1, 2017 (16,440,620 individuals). Socio-demographic and socio-economic information was derived from Statistics Netherlands. Data on green space density (percent of the area) around home were assembled by the Institute for Public Health and the Environment at the address level. The distribution of exposure to green space was described by age groups, sex, ethnicity, household socioeconomic status (SES), and urbanicity degree, and stratified by green space type. The distribution of green space by all vegetation, trees, shrubs, low vegetation, grass field, and agriculture was mapped for the Netherlands in 2017. Small differences in green space density were found across age and sex groups. Ethnic Dutch (58.1%) and Indonesian (54.5%) had more green space coverage around residence than Turkish (50.0%) and Moroccan (50.0%). People with higher household SES generally had greater green space coverage, although it slightly decreased at the highest SES level. Higher urbanicity levels were monotonously associated with lower green space exposure. These differences particularly originated from differences in low vegetation. Observed differences between ethnic and SES groups originated mostly from differences in rural to moderately urbanized areas. Environmental injustice was found among ethnic, SES, and urbanicity groups. The differences were mostly present in low vegetation and in rural to moderately urbanized areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":47692,"journal":{"name":"Population and Environment","volume":"47 3","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-025-00498-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to map the spatial distribution of green space in the Netherlands, and to first comprehensively assess socio-demographic and socio-economic differences in the availability of green space in the Netherlands. Data was analyzed from all registered residents of the Netherlands aged one and above on January 1, 2017 (16,440,620 individuals). Socio-demographic and socio-economic information was derived from Statistics Netherlands. Data on green space density (percent of the area) around home were assembled by the Institute for Public Health and the Environment at the address level. The distribution of exposure to green space was described by age groups, sex, ethnicity, household socioeconomic status (SES), and urbanicity degree, and stratified by green space type. The distribution of green space by all vegetation, trees, shrubs, low vegetation, grass field, and agriculture was mapped for the Netherlands in 2017. Small differences in green space density were found across age and sex groups. Ethnic Dutch (58.1%) and Indonesian (54.5%) had more green space coverage around residence than Turkish (50.0%) and Moroccan (50.0%). People with higher household SES generally had greater green space coverage, although it slightly decreased at the highest SES level. Higher urbanicity levels were monotonously associated with lower green space exposure. These differences particularly originated from differences in low vegetation. Observed differences between ethnic and SES groups originated mostly from differences in rural to moderately urbanized areas. Environmental injustice was found among ethnic, SES, and urbanicity groups. The differences were mostly present in low vegetation and in rural to moderately urbanized areas.

荷兰绿色空间可用性的社会人口和社会经济差异。
我们的目标是绘制荷兰绿地的空间分布图,并首先全面评估荷兰绿地可用性的社会人口和社会经济差异。数据分析来自2017年1月1日年龄在1岁及以上的所有荷兰注册居民(16,440,620人)。社会人口和社会经济资料来自荷兰统计局。家庭周围的绿色空间密度(占面积的百分比)的数据是由公共卫生和环境研究所在住址水平上收集的。以年龄、性别、民族、家庭社会经济地位(SES)和城市化程度描述城市绿地暴露的分布,并按绿地类型分层。2017年,荷兰绘制了所有植被、树木、灌木、低植被、草地和农业的绿地分布地图。不同年龄和性别群体的绿地密度存在微小差异。荷兰族(58.1%)和印度尼西亚族(54.5%)比土耳其族(50.0%)和摩洛哥族(50.0%)拥有更多的住宅周围绿地覆盖率。家庭经济地位较高的人通常有更大的绿地覆盖率,尽管在经济地位最高的时候略有下降。较高的城市化水平单调地与较低的绿地暴露相关。这些差异特别源于低植被的差异。观察到的少数民族和社会经济地位群体之间的差异主要源于农村和中等城市化地区的差异。在少数民族、社会经济阶层和城市化群体中发现了环境不公平现象。差异主要存在于低植被和农村至中等城市化地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Population & Environment is the sole social science journal focused on interdisciplinary research on social demographic aspects of environmental issues. The journal publishes cutting-edge research that contributes new insights on the complex, reciprocal links between human populations and the natural environment in all regions and countries of the world. Quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods contributions are welcome. Disciplines commonly represented in the journal include demography, geography, sociology, human ecology, environmental economics, public health, anthropology and environmental studies. The journal publishes original research, research brief, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信