Introducing Senhance robotic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty: initial experiences, learning curve, and mid-term outcomes from a single center.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Kuan Chong Ng, Shi-Wei Huang, Yu-Wen Huang, Lun-Hsiang Yuan
{"title":"Introducing Senhance robotic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty: initial experiences, learning curve, and mid-term outcomes from a single center.","authors":"Kuan Chong Ng, Shi-Wei Huang, Yu-Wen Huang, Lun-Hsiang Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02500-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty offers less pain and faster recovery than open repair, but it is technically demanding. The Senhance surgical system integrates eye-tracking, haptic feedback, and reusable instruments; however, robust clinical data in TEP remain limited. Between January 2019 and July 2023, we prospectively enrolled 109 adults who underwent Senhance-assisted TEP (S-TEP) at a single center; 57 retrospective laparoscopic TEP (L-TEP) served as an operative-time benchmark. Patients with prior pelvic-malignancy surgery, ascites, peritoneal dialysis, emergency surgeries, or general anesthesia intolerance were excluded. Patient demographics, hernia type, operative time, 30-day complications, pain scores, length of stay, recurrence, and chronic pain were recorded systematically. We used cumulative-sum (CUSUM) analysis to assess the learning curve, and compare the operative-time with L-TEP after overlap weighing balance. All S-TEP procedures were completed robotically without conversions or intra-operative complications. CUSUM revealed a three-phase learning curve, reaching proficiency after ≈50 cases as mean operative time fell from 145 ± 32 min to 93 ± 18 min (p < 0.001). Thirty-day morbidity was 6.4%, mainly early seroma or hematoma. At a median 50-month follow-up, recurrence and chronic pain rates were 0.9 and 1.8%, respectively. Weighted analysis showed that operative time in the mature S-TEP phase matched L-TEP. S-TEP is feasible and safe for inguinal hernioplasty, achieving favorable mid-term outcomes comparable to laparoscopic standards after a learning curve of roughly 50 cases. Further validation through larger, multicenter studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02500-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty offers less pain and faster recovery than open repair, but it is technically demanding. The Senhance surgical system integrates eye-tracking, haptic feedback, and reusable instruments; however, robust clinical data in TEP remain limited. Between January 2019 and July 2023, we prospectively enrolled 109 adults who underwent Senhance-assisted TEP (S-TEP) at a single center; 57 retrospective laparoscopic TEP (L-TEP) served as an operative-time benchmark. Patients with prior pelvic-malignancy surgery, ascites, peritoneal dialysis, emergency surgeries, or general anesthesia intolerance were excluded. Patient demographics, hernia type, operative time, 30-day complications, pain scores, length of stay, recurrence, and chronic pain were recorded systematically. We used cumulative-sum (CUSUM) analysis to assess the learning curve, and compare the operative-time with L-TEP after overlap weighing balance. All S-TEP procedures were completed robotically without conversions or intra-operative complications. CUSUM revealed a three-phase learning curve, reaching proficiency after ≈50 cases as mean operative time fell from 145 ± 32 min to 93 ± 18 min (p < 0.001). Thirty-day morbidity was 6.4%, mainly early seroma or hematoma. At a median 50-month follow-up, recurrence and chronic pain rates were 0.9 and 1.8%, respectively. Weighted analysis showed that operative time in the mature S-TEP phase matched L-TEP. S-TEP is feasible and safe for inguinal hernioplasty, achieving favorable mid-term outcomes comparable to laparoscopic standards after a learning curve of roughly 50 cases. Further validation through larger, multicenter studies are warranted.

介绍senance机器人完全腹膜外疝成形术(TEP):初始经验,学习曲线,和中期结果从单一中心。
腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝成形术(TEP)比开放式修复术疼痛更少,恢复更快,但技术要求较高。senance手术系统集成了眼动追踪、触觉反馈和可重复使用的仪器;然而,TEP的可靠临床数据仍然有限。在2019年1月至2023年7月期间,我们前瞻性地在单个中心招募了109名接受Senhance-assisted TEP (S-TEP)的成年人;57例回顾性腹腔镜TEP (L-TEP)作为手术时间基准。排除既往有盆腔恶性手术、腹水、腹膜透析、急诊手术或全身麻醉不耐受的患者。系统记录患者人口统计学、疝类型、手术时间、30天并发症、疼痛评分、住院时间、复发和慢性疼痛。我们采用累积和(CUSUM)分析评估学习曲线,并将重叠称重平衡后的手术时间与L-TEP进行比较。所有S-TEP手术均由机器人完成,无转换或术中并发症。CUSUM呈现出三期学习曲线,在约50例手术后达到熟练程度,平均手术时间从145±32分钟缩短到93±18分钟(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信