Could a Short Incremental Test Be a Valid Cardiorespiratory Efficiency Assessment Tool in Obese Adults? A Comparison between Two Exercise Testing Protocols.

IF 4.7 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Dafne Ferrari, Valerio Bonavolontà, Matteo Campanella, Ludovica Cardinali, Lavinia Falcioni, Gian Pietro Emerenziani, Silvia Migliaccio, Edoardo Mocini, Marco Meucci, Carlo Baldari, Andrea De Giorgio, Laura Guidetti
{"title":"Could a Short Incremental Test Be a Valid Cardiorespiratory Efficiency Assessment Tool in Obese Adults? A Comparison between Two Exercise Testing Protocols.","authors":"Dafne Ferrari, Valerio Bonavolontà, Matteo Campanella, Ludovica Cardinali, Lavinia Falcioni, Gian Pietro Emerenziani, Silvia Migliaccio, Edoardo Mocini, Marco Meucci, Carlo Baldari, Andrea De Giorgio, Laura Guidetti","doi":"10.7570/jomes24049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess cardiorespiratory efficiency in obese adults, two exercise test treadmill protocols with 2- or 3-min stages were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six obese adult subjects were involved in this study. Sixteen men (age 51.5±10.5 years; BMI 36.7±4.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and 20 women (age 42.4±12.4 years; BMI 36.5±4.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) performed submaximal incremental graded tests on treadmills with 2- or 3-minute stages on different days. During each testing session, heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub> mL/min/kg), rate of perceived exertion (RPE), fat oxidation (FO) at maximal fat oxidation (MFO) and maximal fat oxidation zone (Fat<sub>max</sub> zone) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were found for HR, VO<sub>2</sub>, and RPE at MFO between the two protocols. Significant differences (2-minute vs. 3-minute) were found for FO (576.3±162.9 mg/min vs. 506.0±148.1 mg/min respectively; <i>P</i><0.05) at MFO between the two protocols. No differences were found for VO<sub>2</sub> and HR in high and low Fat<sub>max</sub> zone borders. Moreover, a difference was found for FO at the low and high borders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise intensity at which the MFO and Fat<sub>max</sub> zone occur is not influenced by the duration of stage-to-stage increments. The two exercise testing protocols could be considered interchangeable to assess HR, VO<sub>2</sub>, and RPE at MFO.</p>","PeriodicalId":45386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes24049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess cardiorespiratory efficiency in obese adults, two exercise test treadmill protocols with 2- or 3-min stages were compared.

Methods: Thirty-six obese adult subjects were involved in this study. Sixteen men (age 51.5±10.5 years; BMI 36.7±4.8 kg/m2) and 20 women (age 42.4±12.4 years; BMI 36.5±4.7 kg/m2) performed submaximal incremental graded tests on treadmills with 2- or 3-minute stages on different days. During each testing session, heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (VO2 mL/min/kg), rate of perceived exertion (RPE), fat oxidation (FO) at maximal fat oxidation (MFO) and maximal fat oxidation zone (Fatmax zone) were measured.

Results: No differences were found for HR, VO2, and RPE at MFO between the two protocols. Significant differences (2-minute vs. 3-minute) were found for FO (576.3±162.9 mg/min vs. 506.0±148.1 mg/min respectively; P<0.05) at MFO between the two protocols. No differences were found for VO2 and HR in high and low Fatmax zone borders. Moreover, a difference was found for FO at the low and high borders.

Conclusion: Exercise intensity at which the MFO and Fatmax zone occur is not influenced by the duration of stage-to-stage increments. The two exercise testing protocols could be considered interchangeable to assess HR, VO2, and RPE at MFO.

短期增量试验能否成为肥胖成人有效的心肺功能评估工具?两种运动测试方案的比较。
背景:为了评估肥胖成人的心肺功能,比较了两种2分钟或3分钟阶段的跑步机运动试验方案。方法:选取36例肥胖成人为研究对象。男性16例(年龄51.5±10.5岁;BMI 36.7±4.8 kg/m2),女性20例(年龄42.4±12.4岁;BMI(36.5±4.7 kg/m2)在不同天数的跑步机上以2分钟或3分钟的阶段进行亚最大增量分级试验。在每个测试阶段,测量心率(HR)、摄氧量(VO2 mL/min/kg)、感觉运动率(RPE)、最大脂肪氧化(MFO)时的脂肪氧化(FO)和最大脂肪氧化区(Fatmax)。结果:两种方案在MFO处的HR、VO2和RPE均无差异。2分钟与3分钟的差异显著(分别为576.3±162.9 mg/min和506.0±148.1 mg/min);P2和HR在高、低Fatmax区边界。此外,在低边界和高边界处发现了FO的差异。结论:发生MFO和Fatmax区的运动强度不受阶段间增量持续时间的影响。这两种运动测试方案可以被认为是可互换的,以评估MFO时的HR、VO2和RPE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal was launched in 1992 and diverse studies on obesity have been published under the title of Journal of Korean Society for the Study of Obesity until 2004. Since 2017, volume 26, the title is now the Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome (pISSN 2508-6235, eISSN 2508-7576). The journal is published quarterly on March 30th, June 30th, September 30th and December 30th. The official title of the journal is now "Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome" and the abbreviated title is "J Obes Metab Syndr". Index words from medical subject headings (MeSH) list of Index Medicus are included in each article to facilitate article search. Some or all of the articles of this journal are included in the index of PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Embase, DOAJ, Ebsco, KCI, KoreaMed, KoMCI, Science Central, Crossref Metadata Search, Google Scholar, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信