Nurses' Work Methods Assessment Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Dilek Uysal, Nilüfer Demirsoy, Aysun Türe, Müzelfe Bıyık, Letícia de Lima Trindade, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro, João Miguel Almeida Ventura-Silva
{"title":"Nurses' Work Methods Assessment Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.","authors":"Dilek Uysal, Nilüfer Demirsoy, Aysun Türe, Müzelfe Bıyık, Letícia de Lima Trindade, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro, João Miguel Almeida Ventura-Silva","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15060220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Organizing nurses' work is crucial for ensuring patient care quality and efficiency. Nurses' work methods directly influence patient safety and healthcare outcomes, making them vital for effective health services. Assessing these methods helps identify effective practices, enhance work organization, and improve both professional satisfaction and patient safety. This study aims to translate, adapt, and validate the Nurse Work Method Assessment Scale (NWMAS) for Turkish. <b>Methods</b>: Methodological study with a non-probabilistic sample of 209 hospital nurses, conducted between June and July 2024. The linguistic adaptation involved translation and back-translation with the participation of bilingual experts. Statistical analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, item-total correlation tests, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency assessment using Cronbach's alpha. <b>Results</b>: One item was removed due to cultural incompatibility, resulting in a 24-item Turkish version of the NWMAS. During the adaptation process, expert evaluations led to the removal of one item from the original scale, as it referenced nursing practices that are either not widely implemented or considered culturally incompatible with the structure of the Turkish healthcare system. Content Validity Index values ranged from 0.85 to 0.95. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed a five-factor structure explaining 55.65% of total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported this structure with acceptable fit indices (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.89; RMSEA = 0.06; GFI = 0.86). Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was 0.87, with subscale alphas ranging from 0.52 to 0.82. Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.95 to 0.98, indicating high stability over time. <b>Conclusions</b>: The Turkish version of the NWMAS demonstrated adequate validity and reliability and can be used to evaluate nurses' work methods in Turkish hospital settings. The study highlights the importance of cultural adaptation in scale development to ensure conceptual relevance in local healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12195658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15060220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Organizing nurses' work is crucial for ensuring patient care quality and efficiency. Nurses' work methods directly influence patient safety and healthcare outcomes, making them vital for effective health services. Assessing these methods helps identify effective practices, enhance work organization, and improve both professional satisfaction and patient safety. This study aims to translate, adapt, and validate the Nurse Work Method Assessment Scale (NWMAS) for Turkish. Methods: Methodological study with a non-probabilistic sample of 209 hospital nurses, conducted between June and July 2024. The linguistic adaptation involved translation and back-translation with the participation of bilingual experts. Statistical analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, item-total correlation tests, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency assessment using Cronbach's alpha. Results: One item was removed due to cultural incompatibility, resulting in a 24-item Turkish version of the NWMAS. During the adaptation process, expert evaluations led to the removal of one item from the original scale, as it referenced nursing practices that are either not widely implemented or considered culturally incompatible with the structure of the Turkish healthcare system. Content Validity Index values ranged from 0.85 to 0.95. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed a five-factor structure explaining 55.65% of total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported this structure with acceptable fit indices (χ2/df = 1.89; RMSEA = 0.06; GFI = 0.86). Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was 0.87, with subscale alphas ranging from 0.52 to 0.82. Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.95 to 0.98, indicating high stability over time. Conclusions: The Turkish version of the NWMAS demonstrated adequate validity and reliability and can be used to evaluate nurses' work methods in Turkish hospital settings. The study highlights the importance of cultural adaptation in scale development to ensure conceptual relevance in local healthcare systems.

护士工作方法评定量表:土耳其语效度与信度研究。
背景/目的:组织护士工作是保证患者护理质量和效率的关键。护士的工作方法直接影响患者安全和医疗保健结果,使其对有效的卫生服务至关重要。评估这些方法有助于确定有效的做法,加强工作组织,提高专业满意度和患者安全。本研究旨在翻译、调整和验证土耳其语护士工作方法评估量表(NWMAS)。方法:对2024年6 - 7月209名医院护士进行非概率抽样调查。在双语专家的参与下,语言适应包括翻译和反翻译。统计分析包括探索性和验证性因素分析、项目-总相关检验、测试-重测信度和使用Cronbach's alpha的内部一致性评估。结果:由于文化不兼容,删除了一个项目,产生了24个项目的土耳其版NWMAS。在适应过程中,专家评估导致从原始量表中删除了一个项目,因为它引用的护理实践要么没有广泛实施,要么被认为与土耳其医疗保健系统的结构在文化上不相容。内容效度指数取值范围为0.85 ~ 0.95。探索性因子分析证实五因素结构解释总方差的55.65%。验证性因子分析支持该结构,拟合指数可接受(χ2/df = 1.89;Rmsea = 0.06;Gfi = 0.86)。总体量表的Cronbach’s alpha为0.87,次量表的alpha为0.52 ~ 0.82。重测信度系数在0.95 ~ 0.98之间,表明高稳定性。结论:土耳其版的NWMAS具有足够的效度和信度,可用于评估土耳其医院环境中护士的工作方法。该研究强调了文化适应在规模发展中的重要性,以确保当地医疗保健系统的概念相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信