Patient-derived Design Principles for Technology-Enabled Healing at Home Following Hospital Discharge: A Mixed Methods Assessment.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-06-23 DOI:10.2196/72913
Lindsey Philpot, Abhinav Singla, Sagar B Dugani, Rachel E Canning, Christina M Smith, Meredith A DeZutter, Priya Ramar, Jennifer M P Hovell, Jon O Ebbert
{"title":"Patient-derived Design Principles for Technology-Enabled Healing at Home Following Hospital Discharge: A Mixed Methods Assessment.","authors":"Lindsey Philpot, Abhinav Singla, Sagar B Dugani, Rachel E Canning, Christina M Smith, Meredith A DeZutter, Priya Ramar, Jennifer M P Hovell, Jon O Ebbert","doi":"10.2196/72913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As more patients transition from hospital to home for post-acute care, a growing interest exists in leveraging technology to support recovery, yet limited understanding exists on how to design these tools to align with patient and caregiver needs and preferences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs of recently discharged patients in order to develop user-centered design principles for digital tools that support safe and effective transitions from hospital to home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A vignette-based, mixed-methods survey grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to explore patient perceptions of digital tools supporting post-discharge care. A random sample of 1,000 recently discharged adult patients received a survey featuring validated vignettes and TAM-informed questions, with both quantitative and qualitative items. Open-ended responses were analyzed using Grounded Theory to derive design principles that inform the development and implementation of patient-centered digital health tools. Quantitative items were descriptive in nature and are summarized as count (n) and frequency (%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 967 eligible patients contacted, 116 completed the survey (12.0% response rate), with respondents having a median age of 71 years, high rates of chronic illness, and access to smartphones (84.5%) and in-home internet (95.7%). Qualitative analysis revealed six key themes-connection to care, technical ease-of-use, solution usability, human connection, cost, and privacy-informing three patient-centered design principles focused on user experience, affordability, and transparent communication to guide future technology-supported hospital discharge interventions. Respondents reported the following factors as highly important: reassurance that a care team member would reach out if something seemed wrong (92.2%, n=107/116), responsiveness to patient need (81.9%, n=95/116), ability to see their own data (81.9%, n=95/116), and out of pocket cost (81.0%, n=94/116). Less important factors included duration of device use (19.0%, n=22/116) and battery life (18.0%, n=21/116).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Grounded in patient perspectives, this study identified the three core design principles of User Experience and Accessibility, Cost and Privacy, and Communication and Transparency that should guide the development and implementation of digital tools to support safe, effective, and human-centered transitions from hospital to home.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As more patients transition from hospital to home for post-acute care, a growing interest exists in leveraging technology to support recovery, yet limited understanding exists on how to design these tools to align with patient and caregiver needs and preferences.

Objective: To explore the perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs of recently discharged patients in order to develop user-centered design principles for digital tools that support safe and effective transitions from hospital to home.

Methods: A vignette-based, mixed-methods survey grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to explore patient perceptions of digital tools supporting post-discharge care. A random sample of 1,000 recently discharged adult patients received a survey featuring validated vignettes and TAM-informed questions, with both quantitative and qualitative items. Open-ended responses were analyzed using Grounded Theory to derive design principles that inform the development and implementation of patient-centered digital health tools. Quantitative items were descriptive in nature and are summarized as count (n) and frequency (%).

Results: Of the 967 eligible patients contacted, 116 completed the survey (12.0% response rate), with respondents having a median age of 71 years, high rates of chronic illness, and access to smartphones (84.5%) and in-home internet (95.7%). Qualitative analysis revealed six key themes-connection to care, technical ease-of-use, solution usability, human connection, cost, and privacy-informing three patient-centered design principles focused on user experience, affordability, and transparent communication to guide future technology-supported hospital discharge interventions. Respondents reported the following factors as highly important: reassurance that a care team member would reach out if something seemed wrong (92.2%, n=107/116), responsiveness to patient need (81.9%, n=95/116), ability to see their own data (81.9%, n=95/116), and out of pocket cost (81.0%, n=94/116). Less important factors included duration of device use (19.0%, n=22/116) and battery life (18.0%, n=21/116).

Conclusions: Grounded in patient perspectives, this study identified the three core design principles of User Experience and Accessibility, Cost and Privacy, and Communication and Transparency that should guide the development and implementation of digital tools to support safe, effective, and human-centered transitions from hospital to home.

Clinicaltrial:

出院后居家技术治疗的患者衍生设计原则:混合方法评估。
背景:随着越来越多的患者从医院转到家庭接受急症后护理,人们对利用技术支持康复的兴趣日益浓厚,但对如何设计这些工具以符合患者和护理人员的需求和偏好的理解有限。目的:探讨最近出院患者的看法、态度和信念,以制定以用户为中心的数字工具设计原则,支持从医院到家庭的安全有效过渡。方法:一项基于技术接受模型(TAM)的基于小插曲的混合方法调查,探讨患者对支持出院后护理的数字工具的看法。随机抽取1000名最近出院的成年患者接受了一项调查,其中包括经过验证的小插曲和tam知情问题,包括定量和定性项目。使用扎根理论分析开放式回答,得出设计原则,为以患者为中心的数字健康工具的开发和实施提供信息。定量项目本质上是描述性的,总结为计数(n)和频率(%)。结果:在联系的967名符合条件的患者中,116名完成了调查(12.0%的回复率),受访者中位年龄为71岁,慢性病发病率高,使用智能手机(84.5%)和家庭互联网(95.7%)。定性分析揭示了六个关键主题——与护理的联系、技术易用性、解决方案可用性、人际关系、成本和隐私——告知了三个以患者为中心的设计原则,重点关注用户体验、可负担性和透明的沟通,以指导未来技术支持的医院出院干预措施。受访者认为以下因素非常重要:确保护理团队成员在出现问题时会伸出援手(92.2%,n=107/116),对患者需求的反应性(81.9%,n=95/116),能够查看自己的数据(81.9%,n=95/116),以及自付费用(81.0%,n=94/116)。不太重要的因素包括设备使用时间(19.0%,n=22/116)和电池寿命(18.0%,n=21/116)。结论:基于患者的观点,本研究确定了三个核心设计原则:用户体验和可访问性、成本和隐私、沟通和透明度,这些原则应该指导数字工具的开发和实施,以支持从医院到家庭的安全、有效和以人为本的过渡。临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信