Evolution of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Study on the Original and Modified Techniques for Lung Anatomic Resections.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ching Yang Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yu Fu Wu, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Chun Ting Kuo, Ching Feng Wu
{"title":"Evolution of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Study on the Original and Modified Techniques for Lung Anatomic Resections.","authors":"Ching Yang Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yu Fu Wu, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Chun Ting Kuo, Ching Feng Wu","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (uRATS) has emerged as an innovative minimally invasive approach for lung anatomic resections. This study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of uRATS, comparing the original technique with a modified approach utilizing a novel trocar configuration to minimize incision size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 patients who underwent uRATS for lung cancer between August 2023 and August 2024 at a tertiary medical center. The first 20 cases employed a 4 cm incision with three 8 mm trocars, while the subsequent 20 cases utilized a modified technique incorporating two flared trocars and a central 8 mm trocar, reducing the incision to 3.5 cm. Perioperative outcomes, postoperative pain, and complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean docking, console, and operative times showed no significant differences between the original and modified techniques. The mean postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements were comparable. No conversions to multiport RATS, VATS, or open surgery were required. The most common complication was mild subcutaneous emphysema (5%). Learning curve analysis indicated that approximately 20 cases were needed to achieve technical proficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>uRATS is a safe and feasible approach for lung anatomic resections. The modified technique with flared trocars enables a smaller incision without compromising outcomes. Further studies are warranted to assess long-term oncologic efficacy and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 12","pages":"e70085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (uRATS) has emerged as an innovative minimally invasive approach for lung anatomic resections. This study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of uRATS, comparing the original technique with a modified approach utilizing a novel trocar configuration to minimize incision size.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 patients who underwent uRATS for lung cancer between August 2023 and August 2024 at a tertiary medical center. The first 20 cases employed a 4 cm incision with three 8 mm trocars, while the subsequent 20 cases utilized a modified technique incorporating two flared trocars and a central 8 mm trocar, reducing the incision to 3.5 cm. Perioperative outcomes, postoperative pain, and complications were analyzed.

Results: The mean docking, console, and operative times showed no significant differences between the original and modified techniques. The mean postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements were comparable. No conversions to multiport RATS, VATS, or open surgery were required. The most common complication was mild subcutaneous emphysema (5%). Learning curve analysis indicated that approximately 20 cases were needed to achieve technical proficiency.

Conclusion: uRATS is a safe and feasible approach for lung anatomic resections. The modified technique with flared trocars enables a smaller incision without compromising outcomes. Further studies are warranted to assess long-term oncologic efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

单门机器人辅助胸外科手术的发展:对肺部解剖切除的原始和改进技术的回顾性研究。
背景:Uniportal机器人辅助胸外科手术(uRATS)已成为一种创新的微创肺解剖切除方法。本研究评估了uRATS的安全性、可行性和结果,并将原始技术与利用新型套管针配置最小化切口的改进方法进行了比较。方法:回顾性分析2023年8月至2024年8月在某三级医疗中心接受uRATS治疗的40例肺癌患者。前20例采用4厘米切口和3个8毫米套管针,而随后的20例采用改进的技术,包括两个喇叭套管针和一个中央8毫米套管针,将切口缩小到3.5厘米。分析围手术期结局、术后疼痛及并发症。结果:平均对接、控制和手术时间在原始技术和改进技术之间没有显着差异。术后平均疼痛评分和镇痛需求具有可比性。不需要转换到多端口RATS、VATS或开放手术。最常见的并发症是轻度皮下肺气肿(5%)。学习曲线分析表明大约需要20个案例才能达到技术熟练程度。结论:uRATS是一种安全可行的肺解剖切除方法。改良后的扩口套管针技术可以在不影响手术效果的情况下实现更小的切口。需要进一步的研究来评估长期肿瘤疗效和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信