Predicted Sensory Modality Determines the Timing and Topographies of Omitted Stimulus Potentials.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Tomomi Ishida, Hiroshi Nittono
{"title":"Predicted Sensory Modality Determines the Timing and Topographies of Omitted Stimulus Potentials.","authors":"Tomomi Ishida, Hiroshi Nittono","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is thought that our brains actively predict what will happen next in the environment, but it remains unclear how specific the prediction of an upcoming event is. This study investigated whether the prediction about the sensory modality of the upcoming stimulus modulates neural responses to unexpected omissions of stimuli. Previous research has reported that the peak latencies of omitted stimulus potentials (OSPs) are shorter in the auditory modality than in the visual modality when tested in separate blocks. In this study, we presented auditory and visual stimuli in a fixed alternating pattern to examine whether modality-specific OSPs occur even within a single block. Participants (N = 33) were asked to press a mouse button at a constant interval of 1 s. Each button press triggered either an auditory or visual stimulus, and these were presented twice in an alternating pattern (A, A, V, V, A, A, etc.). The stimuli were omitted in 12% of the trials. This method ensured each type of omission (of either auditory or visual stimuli) to be preceded equally often by either an auditory or a visual stimulus, thereby controlling for late event-related potential components of the preceding stimulus, if any. The results showed that auditory OSPs had shorter peak latencies than visual OSPs and that their scalp topographies differed; auditory OSPs had more anterior and central distributions than visual OSPs. These findings suggest that OSPs occur in a modality-specific manner according to the predicted sensory modality of the upcoming stimulus.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is thought that our brains actively predict what will happen next in the environment, but it remains unclear how specific the prediction of an upcoming event is. This study investigated whether the prediction about the sensory modality of the upcoming stimulus modulates neural responses to unexpected omissions of stimuli. Previous research has reported that the peak latencies of omitted stimulus potentials (OSPs) are shorter in the auditory modality than in the visual modality when tested in separate blocks. In this study, we presented auditory and visual stimuli in a fixed alternating pattern to examine whether modality-specific OSPs occur even within a single block. Participants (N = 33) were asked to press a mouse button at a constant interval of 1 s. Each button press triggered either an auditory or visual stimulus, and these were presented twice in an alternating pattern (A, A, V, V, A, A, etc.). The stimuli were omitted in 12% of the trials. This method ensured each type of omission (of either auditory or visual stimuli) to be preceded equally often by either an auditory or a visual stimulus, thereby controlling for late event-related potential components of the preceding stimulus, if any. The results showed that auditory OSPs had shorter peak latencies than visual OSPs and that their scalp topographies differed; auditory OSPs had more anterior and central distributions than visual OSPs. These findings suggest that OSPs occur in a modality-specific manner according to the predicted sensory modality of the upcoming stimulus.

预测的感觉模态决定了被忽略的刺激电位的时间和地形。
人们认为,我们的大脑会积极预测环境中接下来会发生什么,但目前尚不清楚对即将发生的事件的预测有多具体。本研究探讨了对即将到来的刺激的感觉模态的预测是否调节了对意外的刺激遗漏的神经反应。先前的研究报道,在单独的块测试中,听觉模态的省略刺激电位(OSPs)峰值潜伏期比视觉模态短。在这项研究中,我们以固定的交替模式呈现听觉和视觉刺激,以检查即使在单个街区内是否也会发生特定模式的osp。参与者(N = 33)被要求以恒定的1秒间隔按下鼠标按钮。每次按下按钮都会触发听觉或视觉刺激,这些刺激以交替模式呈现两次(A, A, V, V, A, A等)。12%的试验忽略了刺激。这种方法确保每一种类型的省略(听觉或视觉刺激)之前都同样经常出现听觉或视觉刺激,从而控制了之前刺激中与事件相关的后期潜在成分(如果有的话)。结果表明:听觉性电位峰潜伏期短于视觉性电位峰潜伏期;听觉osp比视觉osp有更多的前部和中央分布。这些发现表明,根据即将到来的刺激的预测感觉模态,op以一种特定模态的方式发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信