Evaluating the safety and functionality of a novel compound containing prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics in healthy cats and dogs.

IF 1 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Open Veterinary Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-31 DOI:10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i5.11
Mamoru Onuma, Kai Ataka, Akiyoshi Murakami
{"title":"Evaluating the safety and functionality of a novel compound containing prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics in healthy cats and dogs.","authors":"Mamoru Onuma, Kai Ataka, Akiyoshi Murakami","doi":"10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i5.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although various prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics are available, their safety and efficacy in combination are unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We investigated the safety and functionality of a newly developed supplement, previously unreported in pet animals, containing 26 types of biotic material bacteria (2 prebiotics, 1 probiotic, and 23 postbiotics) in cats and dogs. The biotic materials included were selected based on current evidence from cats and dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A new supplement developed using species tested in cats and dogs was administered. One-way analysis was used for data obtained from 3 cats (7 days of treatment and 7 days of nontreatment), and a parallel, controlled study was performed in 20 dogs (<i>n</i> = 10 each in control and test groups, for 27 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cats, no abnormal values were observed in complete blood count or blood chemistry tests, whereas significant decreases in blood glucose and total cholesterol were confirmed (<i>p</i> < 0.05 each). In the feline lymphocyte subset test, significant increases were observed in T and B cells (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A significant difference in fecal pH was observed in the test group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). In addition, 60% (9/15) of the test group had an increase in total organic acids. In dogs, only indole showed a consistent decrease among putrefactive products (<i>p</i> = 0.055). Regarding analyses of intestinal flora from feces using a gene sequencer at the genus level, no changes were observed in cats. Conversely, <i>Lachnospira</i> and <i>Anaeroplasma</i> genera tended to be decreased in the control group but increased by 23.1% and 45%, respectively, in the test group. In addition, <i>Escherichia-Shigella</i> and <i>Tyzzerella</i> genera showed slight increases or changes in the control group but significant decreases in the test group. Regarding the <i>Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes</i> ratio, an increase in the control group and a decrease in the test group were observed in all cats, whereas no differences were observed in dogs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The supplement is safe for both cats and dogs. Results of comprehensive analyses suggested that the supplement improved the intestinal environment by regulating the gastrointestinal microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":19531,"journal":{"name":"Open Veterinary Journal","volume":"15 5","pages":"1969-1981"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i5.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although various prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics are available, their safety and efficacy in combination are unknown.

Aim: We investigated the safety and functionality of a newly developed supplement, previously unreported in pet animals, containing 26 types of biotic material bacteria (2 prebiotics, 1 probiotic, and 23 postbiotics) in cats and dogs. The biotic materials included were selected based on current evidence from cats and dogs.

Methods: A new supplement developed using species tested in cats and dogs was administered. One-way analysis was used for data obtained from 3 cats (7 days of treatment and 7 days of nontreatment), and a parallel, controlled study was performed in 20 dogs (n = 10 each in control and test groups, for 27 days).

Results: In cats, no abnormal values were observed in complete blood count or blood chemistry tests, whereas significant decreases in blood glucose and total cholesterol were confirmed (p < 0.05 each). In the feline lymphocyte subset test, significant increases were observed in T and B cells (p < 0.05). A significant difference in fecal pH was observed in the test group (p < 0.01). In addition, 60% (9/15) of the test group had an increase in total organic acids. In dogs, only indole showed a consistent decrease among putrefactive products (p = 0.055). Regarding analyses of intestinal flora from feces using a gene sequencer at the genus level, no changes were observed in cats. Conversely, Lachnospira and Anaeroplasma genera tended to be decreased in the control group but increased by 23.1% and 45%, respectively, in the test group. In addition, Escherichia-Shigella and Tyzzerella genera showed slight increases or changes in the control group but significant decreases in the test group. Regarding the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, an increase in the control group and a decrease in the test group were observed in all cats, whereas no differences were observed in dogs.

Conclusion: The supplement is safe for both cats and dogs. Results of comprehensive analyses suggested that the supplement improved the intestinal environment by regulating the gastrointestinal microbiota.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估一种含有益生元、益生菌和后益生菌的新型化合物在健康猫和狗中的安全性和功能性。
背景:虽然有多种益生元、益生菌和后益生菌,但它们联合使用的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。目的:我们研究了一种新开发的补充剂的安全性和功能性,这种补充剂以前未在宠物动物中报道过,它在猫和狗中含有26种生物材料细菌(2种益生元,1种益生菌和23种后益生菌)。所包括的生物材料是根据猫和狗的现有证据选择的。方法:使用在猫和狗身上测试的物种开发的一种新补充剂。对3只猫(治疗7天和未治疗7天)的数据进行单向分析,并对20只狗进行平行对照研究(对照组和试验组各n = 10,为期27天)。结果:猫的全血细胞计数和血液化学检查均未见异常,血糖和总胆固醇均显著降低(p < 0.05)。在猫淋巴细胞亚群试验中,T细胞和B细胞显著升高(p < 0.05)。试验组粪便pH值差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。另外,试验组60%(9/15)的总有机酸含量升高。在狗中,只有吲哚在腐坏产物中表现出一致的下降(p = 0.055)。关于使用基因测序仪在属水平上分析粪便中的肠道菌群,在猫中没有观察到变化。相反,对照组毛螺旋体属和无氧原体属呈下降趋势,试验组毛螺旋体属和无氧原体属分别上升了23.1%和45%。此外,志贺氏杆菌属和泰泽勒氏杆菌属在对照组中有轻微的增加或变化,而在试验组中有明显的减少。关于厚壁菌门/拟杆菌门比率,在所有猫中观察到对照组增加,试验组减少,而在狗中没有观察到差异。结论:该补充剂对猫和狗都是安全的。综合分析结果表明,该补充剂通过调节胃肠道微生物群改善了肠道环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Veterinary Journal
Open Veterinary Journal VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Veterinary Journal is a peer-reviewed international open access online and printed journal that publishes high-quality original research articles. reviews, short communications and case reports dedicated to all aspects of veterinary sciences and its related subjects. Research areas include the following: Infectious diseases of zoonotic/food-borne importance, applied biochemistry, parasitology, endocrinology, microbiology, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, epidemiology, molecular biology, immunogenetics, surgery, ophthalmology, dermatology, oncology and animal reproduction. All papers are peer-reviewed. Moreover, with the presence of well-qualified group of international referees, the process of publication will be done meticulously and to the highest standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信