Xando Díaz-Villamarín, María Martínez-Pérez, María Teresa Nieto-Sánchez, Emilio Fernández-Varón, Alicia Torres-García, Isabel Blancas, José Cabeza-Barrera, Rocío Morón
{"title":"Clinical Pharmacogenetics: Results After Implementation of Preemptive Tests in Daily Routine.","authors":"Xando Díaz-Villamarín, María Martínez-Pérez, María Teresa Nieto-Sánchez, Emilio Fernández-Varón, Alicia Torres-García, Isabel Blancas, José Cabeza-Barrera, Rocío Morón","doi":"10.3390/jpm15060245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx) remains limited, even for well-established drug-gene interactions. In addition to insufficient infrastructure and PGx education among healthcare professionals, there is currently no consensus regarding which genetic variants should be tested, the most appropriate testing approach (e.g., single-gene vs. multi-gene panels), or how to translate genotypes into actionable therapeutic recommendations. <b>Methods:</b> We describe the implementation of PGx in real daily clinical routine at a single institution to guide other centers. We analyze the drug-gene interactions and genetic variants included in our program based on allelic, genotypic, and phenotypic frequencies, resulting therapeutic recommendations. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analyses are also performed. <b>Results and Conclusions:</b> PGx testing was primarily requested by the oncology department. Not all variants included in typical panels had clinical utility in our setting. We do not recommend testing <i>CYP2C19</i><i>*17</i> prior to clopidogrel prescription, as it does not translate into a dosing recommendation. <i>TPMT*3B</i> may be considered just to confirm <i>TPMT*3A</i> due to its linkage with <i>TPMT</i>*3C. Similarly, we do not recommend the routine testing of <i>CYP2C9*2</i> prior to siponimod prescription, as it does not inform therapeutic decisions according to the current drug label.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15060245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx) remains limited, even for well-established drug-gene interactions. In addition to insufficient infrastructure and PGx education among healthcare professionals, there is currently no consensus regarding which genetic variants should be tested, the most appropriate testing approach (e.g., single-gene vs. multi-gene panels), or how to translate genotypes into actionable therapeutic recommendations. Methods: We describe the implementation of PGx in real daily clinical routine at a single institution to guide other centers. We analyze the drug-gene interactions and genetic variants included in our program based on allelic, genotypic, and phenotypic frequencies, resulting therapeutic recommendations. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analyses are also performed. Results and Conclusions: PGx testing was primarily requested by the oncology department. Not all variants included in typical panels had clinical utility in our setting. We do not recommend testing CYP2C19*17 prior to clopidogrel prescription, as it does not translate into a dosing recommendation. TPMT*3B may be considered just to confirm TPMT*3A due to its linkage with TPMT*3C. Similarly, we do not recommend the routine testing of CYP2C9*2 prior to siponimod prescription, as it does not inform therapeutic decisions according to the current drug label.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.