Clinical Pharmacogenetics: Results After Implementation of Preemptive Tests in Daily Routine.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xando Díaz-Villamarín, María Martínez-Pérez, María Teresa Nieto-Sánchez, Emilio Fernández-Varón, Alicia Torres-García, Isabel Blancas, José Cabeza-Barrera, Rocío Morón
{"title":"Clinical Pharmacogenetics: Results After Implementation of Preemptive Tests in Daily Routine.","authors":"Xando Díaz-Villamarín, María Martínez-Pérez, María Teresa Nieto-Sánchez, Emilio Fernández-Varón, Alicia Torres-García, Isabel Blancas, José Cabeza-Barrera, Rocío Morón","doi":"10.3390/jpm15060245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx) remains limited, even for well-established drug-gene interactions. In addition to insufficient infrastructure and PGx education among healthcare professionals, there is currently no consensus regarding which genetic variants should be tested, the most appropriate testing approach (e.g., single-gene vs. multi-gene panels), or how to translate genotypes into actionable therapeutic recommendations. <b>Methods:</b> We describe the implementation of PGx in real daily clinical routine at a single institution to guide other centers. We analyze the drug-gene interactions and genetic variants included in our program based on allelic, genotypic, and phenotypic frequencies, resulting therapeutic recommendations. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analyses are also performed. <b>Results and Conclusions:</b> PGx testing was primarily requested by the oncology department. Not all variants included in typical panels had clinical utility in our setting. We do not recommend testing <i>CYP2C19</i><i>*17</i> prior to clopidogrel prescription, as it does not translate into a dosing recommendation. <i>TPMT*3B</i> may be considered just to confirm <i>TPMT*3A</i> due to its linkage with <i>TPMT</i>*3C. Similarly, we do not recommend the routine testing of <i>CYP2C9*2</i> prior to siponimod prescription, as it does not inform therapeutic decisions according to the current drug label.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15060245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx) remains limited, even for well-established drug-gene interactions. In addition to insufficient infrastructure and PGx education among healthcare professionals, there is currently no consensus regarding which genetic variants should be tested, the most appropriate testing approach (e.g., single-gene vs. multi-gene panels), or how to translate genotypes into actionable therapeutic recommendations. Methods: We describe the implementation of PGx in real daily clinical routine at a single institution to guide other centers. We analyze the drug-gene interactions and genetic variants included in our program based on allelic, genotypic, and phenotypic frequencies, resulting therapeutic recommendations. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analyses are also performed. Results and Conclusions: PGx testing was primarily requested by the oncology department. Not all variants included in typical panels had clinical utility in our setting. We do not recommend testing CYP2C19*17 prior to clopidogrel prescription, as it does not translate into a dosing recommendation. TPMT*3B may be considered just to confirm TPMT*3A due to its linkage with TPMT*3C. Similarly, we do not recommend the routine testing of CYP2C9*2 prior to siponimod prescription, as it does not inform therapeutic decisions according to the current drug label.

临床药物遗传学:实施日常预防性试验后的结果。
背景/目的:药物遗传学(PGx)的临床应用仍然有限,即使已经建立了药物-基因相互作用。除了医疗保健专业人员的基础设施和PGx教育不足之外,目前对于应该测试哪些遗传变异,最合适的测试方法(例如,单基因与多基因面板),或者如何将基因型转化为可操作的治疗建议,还没有达成共识。方法:我们描述了PGx在单个机构的实际日常临床常规中的实施情况,以指导其他中心。我们根据等位基因、基因型和表型频率分析药物-基因相互作用和基因变异,从而提出治疗建议。还进行了连锁不平衡和单倍型分析。结果与结论:PGx检测主要是肿瘤科要求的。在我们的研究中,并非所有纳入典型小组的变异都具有临床效用。我们不建议在处方氯吡格雷之前检测CYP2C19*17,因为它不能转化为剂量建议。由于TPMT*3B与TPMT*3C具有连锁关系,因此可以认为TPMT*3B只是为了确认TPMT*3A。同样,我们不建议在处方西泊莫之前常规检测CYP2C9*2,因为它不能根据当前的药物标签提供治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信