The efficacy of immediate lymphatic reconstruction in preventing breast cancer-related lymphedema: long-term follow-up study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ki-Jae Kim, Sun-Hyeok Kim, Seung-Pil Jung, Eul-Sik Yoon, Jae-Ho Chung
{"title":"The efficacy of immediate lymphatic reconstruction in preventing breast cancer-related lymphedema: long-term follow-up study.","authors":"Ki-Jae Kim, Sun-Hyeok Kim, Seung-Pil Jung, Eul-Sik Yoon, Jae-Ho Chung","doi":"10.2340/jphs.v60.43738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has emerged as an effective intervention to reduce breast cancer-related lymphedema, which affects 2-30% of patients who undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Our previous research validated ILR's effectiveness over 14 months, but the duration was short and warranted further study. This study provides long-term evidence of its benefits in a well-defined patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included unilateral breast cancer patients who underwent ALND between November 2019 and February 2021 with ≥ 24 months of follow-up. Patients were grouped by whether ILR was attempted intraoperatively. Exclusion criteria were recurrence, prophylactic mastectomy, and pre-existing lymphedema. The primary outcome was lymphedema incidence at ≥ 24 months; the secondary was lymphedema-free survival. Outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 73 patients, we analyzed ALND patients divided into a control group (n = 57, defined as no-try or failure) and an ILR group (n = 16). The pooled median follow-up was 37 months. (range, 26~47 months). Among the ILR group, 13 underwent end-to-end anastomosis and 3 end-to-side. Postoperative lymphedema was higher in the control group (24.6%) compared to the ILR group (6.3%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a significantly lower hazard ratio for the ILR group (HR: 0.117, 95% CI: 0.014-0.965), emphasizing ILR's effectiveness in reducing lymphedema risk post-ALND. Additionally, survival plots illustrating lymphedema-free survival showed a significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study emphasizes ILR's efficacy over extended follow-up. The ILR group exhibited a lower rate of postoperative lymphedema, supporting ILR as an effective preventive measure against Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) following ALND.</p>","PeriodicalId":16847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"60 ","pages":"138-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.43738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has emerged as an effective intervention to reduce breast cancer-related lymphedema, which affects 2-30% of patients who undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Our previous research validated ILR's effectiveness over 14 months, but the duration was short and warranted further study. This study provides long-term evidence of its benefits in a well-defined patient cohort.

Method: This retrospective cohort study included unilateral breast cancer patients who underwent ALND between November 2019 and February 2021 with ≥ 24 months of follow-up. Patients were grouped by whether ILR was attempted intraoperatively. Exclusion criteria were recurrence, prophylactic mastectomy, and pre-existing lymphedema. The primary outcome was lymphedema incidence at ≥ 24 months; the secondary was lymphedema-free survival. Outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression models.

Results: Among 73 patients, we analyzed ALND patients divided into a control group (n = 57, defined as no-try or failure) and an ILR group (n = 16). The pooled median follow-up was 37 months. (range, 26~47 months). Among the ILR group, 13 underwent end-to-end anastomosis and 3 end-to-side. Postoperative lymphedema was higher in the control group (24.6%) compared to the ILR group (6.3%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a significantly lower hazard ratio for the ILR group (HR: 0.117, 95% CI: 0.014-0.965), emphasizing ILR's effectiveness in reducing lymphedema risk post-ALND. Additionally, survival plots illustrating lymphedema-free survival showed a significant difference.

Conclusion: Our study emphasizes ILR's efficacy over extended follow-up. The ILR group exhibited a lower rate of postoperative lymphedema, supporting ILR as an effective preventive measure against Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) following ALND.

即时淋巴重建预防乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的疗效:长期随访研究。
背景:即时淋巴重建(ILR)已成为减少乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的有效干预措施,2-30%的患者接受腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)。我们之前的研究证实了ILR的有效性超过14个月,但持续时间短,值得进一步研究。这项研究在一个明确的患者队列中提供了其益处的长期证据。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入2019年11月至2021年2月期间接受ALND的单侧乳腺癌患者,随访≥24个月。根据术中是否尝试过ILR对患者进行分组。排除标准为复发、预防性乳房切除术和既往淋巴水肿。主要终点是≥24个月时的淋巴水肿发生率;其次是无淋巴水肿生存期。使用Cox回归模型评估结果。结果:我们对73例ALND患者进行分析,分为对照组(n = 57,定义为未尝试或失败)和ILR组(n = 16)。中位随访时间为37个月。(范围26~47个月)。ILR组端端吻合13例,端侧吻合3例。术后淋巴水肿在对照组(24.6%)高于ILR组(6.3%)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,ILR组的风险比显著降低(HR: 0.117, 95% CI: 0.014-0.965),强调了ILR在降低alnd后淋巴水肿风险方面的有效性。此外,显示无淋巴水肿生存的生存图显示显着差异。结论:我们的研究强调了ILR在延长随访中的疗效。ILR组术后淋巴水肿发生率较低,支持ILR作为预防ALND后乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的有效措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery is to serve as an international forum for plastic surgery, hand surgery and related research. Interest is focused on original articles on basic research and clinical evaluation. The scope of the journal comprises: • Articles concerning operative methods and follow-up studies • Research articles on subjects related to plastic and hand surgery • Articles on cranio-maxillofacial surgery, including cleft lip and palate surgery. Extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics such as microvascular surgery, craniofacial surgery, or burns. Supplements, usually doctoral theses, may also be published. The journal is published for the Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica society and sponsored by the Key Foundation, Sweden. The journal was previously published as Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信