{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment and Grading of Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Daniele Omar Traini, Gerardo Palmisano, Cristina Guerriero, Ketty Peris","doi":"10.3390/jpm15060238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acne vulgaris is a common dermatological condition, particularly affecting adolescents during critical developmental stages, which may have lasting psychosocial impacts. Traditional assessments, including global severity grading and lesion counting, are limited by subjectivity and time constraints. <b>Background/Objectives</b>: This review aims to systematically assess the recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for acne diagnosis, lesion segmentation/counting, and severity grading, highlighting the potential of AI-driven methods to improve objectivity, reproducibility, and clinical efficiency. <b>Methods</b>: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, arXiv, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published between 1 January 2017 and 1 March 2025. The search strategy incorporated terms related to \"acne\" and various AI methodologies (e.g., \"neural network\", \"deep learning\", \"convolutional neural network\"). Two independent reviewers screened 345 articles, with 29 studies ultimately meeting inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study design, dataset characteristics (including internal and publicly available resources such as ACNE04 and AcneSCU), AI architectures (predominantly CNN-based models), and performance metrics. <b>Results</b>: While AI-driven models demonstrated promising accuracy, as high as 97.6% in controlled settings, the limited availability of large public datasets, the predominance of data from specific ethnic groups, and the lack of extensive external validation underscore critical barriers to clinical implementation. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings indicate that although AI has the potential to standardize acne assessments, reduce observer variability, and enable self-monitoring via mobile platforms, significant challenges remain in achieving robust, real-world applicability. Future research should prioritize the development of large, diverse, and publicly accessible datasets and undertake prospective clinical validations to ensure equitable and effective dermatological care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15060238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Acne vulgaris is a common dermatological condition, particularly affecting adolescents during critical developmental stages, which may have lasting psychosocial impacts. Traditional assessments, including global severity grading and lesion counting, are limited by subjectivity and time constraints. Background/Objectives: This review aims to systematically assess the recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for acne diagnosis, lesion segmentation/counting, and severity grading, highlighting the potential of AI-driven methods to improve objectivity, reproducibility, and clinical efficiency. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, arXiv, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published between 1 January 2017 and 1 March 2025. The search strategy incorporated terms related to "acne" and various AI methodologies (e.g., "neural network", "deep learning", "convolutional neural network"). Two independent reviewers screened 345 articles, with 29 studies ultimately meeting inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study design, dataset characteristics (including internal and publicly available resources such as ACNE04 and AcneSCU), AI architectures (predominantly CNN-based models), and performance metrics. Results: While AI-driven models demonstrated promising accuracy, as high as 97.6% in controlled settings, the limited availability of large public datasets, the predominance of data from specific ethnic groups, and the lack of extensive external validation underscore critical barriers to clinical implementation. Conclusions: The findings indicate that although AI has the potential to standardize acne assessments, reduce observer variability, and enable self-monitoring via mobile platforms, significant challenges remain in achieving robust, real-world applicability. Future research should prioritize the development of large, diverse, and publicly accessible datasets and undertake prospective clinical validations to ensure equitable and effective dermatological care.
寻常痤疮是一种常见的皮肤病,尤其影响处于关键发育阶段的青少年,可能会产生持久的社会心理影响。传统的评估,包括全球严重程度分级和病变计数,受到主观性和时间限制的限制。背景/目的:本综述旨在系统评估人工智能(AI)在痤疮诊断、病变分割/计数和严重程度分级方面的最新进展,强调人工智能驱动方法在提高客观性、可重复性和临床效率方面的潜力。方法:通过PubMed、Scopus、arXiv、Embase和Web of Science对2017年1月1日至2025年3月1日之间发表的研究进行全面的文献检索。该搜索策略包含了与“痤疮”和各种人工智能方法相关的术语(例如,“神经网络”、“深度学习”、“卷积神经网络”)。两名独立审稿人筛选了345篇文章,其中29项研究最终符合纳入标准。从研究设计、数据集特征(包括内部和公开资源,如ACNE04和AcneSCU)、人工智能架构(主要是基于cnn的模型)和性能指标中提取数据。结果:虽然人工智能驱动的模型显示出有希望的准确性,在受控环境中高达97.6%,但大型公共数据集的可用性有限,来自特定种族的数据占主导地位,以及缺乏广泛的外部验证,这些都是临床实施的关键障碍。结论:研究结果表明,尽管人工智能有可能标准化痤疮评估,减少观察者的可变性,并通过移动平台实现自我监测,但在实现强大的、现实世界的适用性方面仍存在重大挑战。未来的研究应优先开发大型、多样化和可公开访问的数据集,并进行前瞻性临床验证,以确保公平和有效的皮肤科护理。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.