A Longitudinal Study Evaluating the Impact of 0.01% Atropine in High Myopic Children (RAMCOM-II Study).

IF 1.2 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_107_24
Pradeep Agarwal, Veenu Maan, Ashi Khurana, Samir Sutar, Lokesh Chauhan
{"title":"A Longitudinal Study Evaluating the Impact of 0.01% Atropine in High Myopic Children (RAMCOM-II Study).","authors":"Pradeep Agarwal, Veenu Maan, Ashi Khurana, Samir Sutar, Lokesh Chauhan","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_107_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of the 4-year administration of 0.01% atropine following a 1-year observation period in high myopic children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RAMCOM-II study continues the RAMCOM study, designed as an interventional nonrandomized study. Participants were observed for 1 year without any intervention to establish a baseline. Subsequently, children were divided into two arms: participants in the intervention group received one drop of 0.01% atropine daily at bedtime from years 1 to 5, while the control arm received no treatment and was monitored with routine clinical examinations. Annual assessments captured myopia progression, visual acuity, adverse events, and compliance. Statistical analyses compared outcomes between the two groups, considering demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 4-year follow-up, myopia progression from baseline in the intervention group (atropine-treated eyes) was significantly lower than in the control group (2.0 ± 2.0 diopter [D] vs. 3.2 ± 1.9 D, <i>P</i> = 0.01). Axial elongation also favored the intervention group. At the 5-year follow-up, similar trends persisted, underscoring the sustained efficacy of 0.01% atropine. Myopia progression remained significantly reduced in the intervention group compared to the control group (2.2 ± 2.0 D vs. 3.4 ± 1.9 D, <i>P</i> = 0.01). Although differences in axial elongation were less pronounced, these findings highlight the long-term benefits of 0.01% atropine in managing high myopia in children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RAMCOM-II study supports the efficacy of 0.01% atropine in controlling myopia progression over 5 years, emphasizing its promising role in pediatric high myopia management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"36 3","pages":"291-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_107_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of the 4-year administration of 0.01% atropine following a 1-year observation period in high myopic children.

Methods: The RAMCOM-II study continues the RAMCOM study, designed as an interventional nonrandomized study. Participants were observed for 1 year without any intervention to establish a baseline. Subsequently, children were divided into two arms: participants in the intervention group received one drop of 0.01% atropine daily at bedtime from years 1 to 5, while the control arm received no treatment and was monitored with routine clinical examinations. Annual assessments captured myopia progression, visual acuity, adverse events, and compliance. Statistical analyses compared outcomes between the two groups, considering demographic factors.

Results: At the 4-year follow-up, myopia progression from baseline in the intervention group (atropine-treated eyes) was significantly lower than in the control group (2.0 ± 2.0 diopter [D] vs. 3.2 ± 1.9 D, P = 0.01). Axial elongation also favored the intervention group. At the 5-year follow-up, similar trends persisted, underscoring the sustained efficacy of 0.01% atropine. Myopia progression remained significantly reduced in the intervention group compared to the control group (2.2 ± 2.0 D vs. 3.4 ± 1.9 D, P = 0.01). Although differences in axial elongation were less pronounced, these findings highlight the long-term benefits of 0.01% atropine in managing high myopia in children.

Conclusion: The RAMCOM-II study supports the efficacy of 0.01% atropine in controlling myopia progression over 5 years, emphasizing its promising role in pediatric high myopia management.

一项评价0.01%阿托品对高度近视儿童影响的纵向研究(RAMCOM-II研究)。
目的:评价0.01%阿托品治疗高度近视儿童1年观察期后4年的安全性和有效性。方法:RAMCOM- ii研究延续RAMCOM研究,设计为介入性非随机研究。参与者在没有任何干预的情况下观察了1年以建立基线。随后,将儿童分为两组:干预组的参与者从1岁到5岁每天睡前服用0.01%的阿托品,而对照组的参与者不接受任何治疗,并进行常规临床检查监测。年度评估包括近视进展、视力、不良事件和依从性。统计分析比较了两组的结果,考虑了人口因素。结果:随访4年时,干预组(阿托品治疗眼)的近视进展较对照组明显降低(2.0±2.0屈光度[D]∶3.2±1.9 D, P = 0.01)。轴向伸长也有利于干预组。在5年的随访中,类似的趋势持续存在,强调0.01%阿托品的持续疗效。与对照组相比,干预组的近视进展仍显著减少(2.2±2.0 D vs. 3.4±1.9 D, P = 0.01)。虽然轴向伸长的差异不太明显,但这些发现强调了0.01%阿托品在治疗儿童高度近视中的长期益处。结论:RAMCOM-II研究支持0.01%阿托品在5年内控制近视进展的有效性,强调了其在小儿高度近视治疗中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信