Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Outcomes in Phakic and Pseudophakic Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.2 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_285_23
Rushil Kumbhani, Amanda Wong, Aretha Zhu, Paras Shah, Tristan Tham, Farihah Anwar, Daniel Zhu
{"title":"Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Outcomes in Phakic and Pseudophakic Patients: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rushil Kumbhani, Amanda Wong, Aretha Zhu, Paras Shah, Tristan Tham, Farihah Anwar, Daniel Zhu","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_285_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in phakic and pseudophakic eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and gray literature were searched for studies comparing SLT outcomes in phakic and pseudophakic patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). The mean change in intraocular pressure was compared using a standardized mean difference (SMD) meta-analysis (RevMan 5.4.1). Begg's funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies with 1058 eyes (323 pseudophakic and 735 phakic) were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in the observed efficacy of SLT between pseudophakic and phakic eyes (SMD = -0.10; 95% confidence interval = -0.24, 0.03; <i>P</i> = 0.14). There was no publication bias or heterogeneity (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%; <i>P</i> = 0.66) detected. Subgroup analysis of studies stratified by length of follow-up in months (6, 12, and 24 or greater) revealed no significant difference in SLT efficacy at the different time points (<i>P</i> = 0.86, <i>P</i> = 0.59, and <i>P</i> = 0.16, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our pooled and subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in SLT response between the two populations. Our results support SLT as a viable treatment option for patients with OAG or OHT regardless of pseudophakic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"36 3","pages":"242-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_285_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in phakic and pseudophakic eyes.

Methods: Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and gray literature were searched for studies comparing SLT outcomes in phakic and pseudophakic patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). The mean change in intraocular pressure was compared using a standardized mean difference (SMD) meta-analysis (RevMan 5.4.1). Begg's funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias.

Results: Eleven studies with 1058 eyes (323 pseudophakic and 735 phakic) were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in the observed efficacy of SLT between pseudophakic and phakic eyes (SMD = -0.10; 95% confidence interval = -0.24, 0.03; P = 0.14). There was no publication bias or heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%; P = 0.66) detected. Subgroup analysis of studies stratified by length of follow-up in months (6, 12, and 24 or greater) revealed no significant difference in SLT efficacy at the different time points (P = 0.86, P = 0.59, and P = 0.16, respectively).

Conclusions: Our pooled and subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in SLT response between the two populations. Our results support SLT as a viable treatment option for patients with OAG or OHT regardless of pseudophakic status.

选择性激光小梁成形术治疗晶状体和假性晶状体的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
目的:进行荟萃分析,比较选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)治疗晶状眼和假性晶状眼的疗效。方法:检索Scopus、Embase、PubMed和灰色文献,比较晶状体和假性晶状体伴开角型青光眼(OAG)或高眼压(OHT)患者的SLT结果。采用标准化均差(SMD) meta分析(RevMan 5.4.1)比较眼压的平均变化。使用贝格漏斗图和艾格检验来评估发表偏倚。结果:共发现11例1058只眼,其中假性晶状眼323只,晶状眼735只。观察到的SLT在假性晶状眼和晶状眼之间的疗效差异无统计学意义(SMD = -0.10;95%置信区间= -0.24,0.03;P = 0.14)。没有发表偏倚或异质性(i2 = 0%;P = 0.66)。按随访时间(6个月、12个月和24个月以上)分层的研究亚组分析显示,SLT疗效在不同时间点无显著差异(P = 0.86、P = 0.59和P = 0.16)。结论:我们的汇总和亚组分析显示两个人群在SLT反应上没有显著差异。我们的研究结果支持SLT作为OAG或OHT患者的可行治疗选择,无论其是否处于假性失明状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信