Internal consistency, sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of the short version of the Zarit Burden Interview-7 scores: systematic review and generalization meta-analysis

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Júlia Gisbert-Pérez , Elena Cejalvo , Manuel Martí-Vilar , Laura Badenes-Ribera
{"title":"Internal consistency, sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of the short version of the Zarit Burden Interview-7 scores: systematic review and generalization meta-analysis","authors":"Júlia Gisbert-Pérez ,&nbsp;Elena Cejalvo ,&nbsp;Manuel Martí-Vilar ,&nbsp;Laura Badenes-Ribera","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The <em>Zarit Burden Interview (</em>ZBI) is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing caregiver burden. One of the most used short scales of the ZBI is the 7-item version. The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and generalization meta-analysis of the reliability and validity of the scores of the short version ZBI-7 items to determine whether they provide average values that justify their application and, secondly, to identify the characteristics of the studies that could explain the heterogeneity among the estimates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-eight articles were identified that applied the short version of the ZBI-7, of which only 14 reported a reliability coefficient and 7 reported sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. A random effects model was applied in the statistical analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.866 (95 % CI [0.835, 0.891], k = 15), with high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 86.4 %). Mean sensitivity was 98.6 % (95 % CI [70.0 %–95.3 %], k = 3), mean specificity was 87.4 % (95 % CI [93.6 %–99.7 %], k = 3), mean positive predictive value was 93.7 % (95 % CI [81.3 %–98.1 %], k = 3), mean negative predictive value was 97.3 % (95 % CI [87.5, 99.4], k = 3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>According to psychometric theory, the ZBI-7 can be considered reliable and valid for exploratory purposes in both research and clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"388 ","pages":"Article 119744"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725011863","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing caregiver burden. One of the most used short scales of the ZBI is the 7-item version. The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and generalization meta-analysis of the reliability and validity of the scores of the short version ZBI-7 items to determine whether they provide average values that justify their application and, secondly, to identify the characteristics of the studies that could explain the heterogeneity among the estimates.

Methods

Forty-eight articles were identified that applied the short version of the ZBI-7, of which only 14 reported a reliability coefficient and 7 reported sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. A random effects model was applied in the statistical analyses.

Results

The average Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.866 (95 % CI [0.835, 0.891], k = 15), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 86.4 %). Mean sensitivity was 98.6 % (95 % CI [70.0 %–95.3 %], k = 3), mean specificity was 87.4 % (95 % CI [93.6 %–99.7 %], k = 3), mean positive predictive value was 93.7 % (95 % CI [81.3 %–98.1 %], k = 3), mean negative predictive value was 97.3 % (95 % CI [87.5, 99.4], k = 3).

Conclusions

According to psychometric theory, the ZBI-7 can be considered reliable and valid for exploratory purposes in both research and clinical practice.
短版Zarit Burden Interview-7评分的内部一致性、敏感性、特异性和预测价值:系统评价和泛化荟萃分析
目的:Zarit负担访谈(ZBI)是评估照顾者负担最广泛使用的工具之一。ZBI最常用的短量表之一是7项版本。本研究的目的是对短版ZBI-7项目得分的信度和效度进行系统回顾和综合元分析,以确定它们是否提供了证明其应用合理性的平均值,其次,确定研究的特征,可以解释估计之间的异质性。方法:选取48篇采用短版ZBI-7的文章,其中仅有14篇报道了信度系数,7篇报道了敏感性、特异性和预测值。统计分析采用随机效应模型。结果:平均Cronbach's alpha系数为0.866(95 % CI [0.835, 0.891], k = 15),异质性较高(I2 = 86.4 %)。意思是灵敏度98.6 %(95 % CI(70.0 % -95.3 %),k = 3),意思是特异性87.4 %(95 % CI(93.6 % -99.7 %),k = 3),平均阳性预测值为93.7 %(95 % CI(81.3 % -98.1 %),k = 3),意思是阴性预测值为97.3 %(95 % CI [87.5, 99.4], k = 3)。结论:根据心理测量学理论,ZBI-7量表在研究和临床实践中都具有一定的可靠性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信