Sreevani Katabathula, Mark Gurney, George Perry, Pamela B Davis, Rong Xu
{"title":"Identifying patients with mild cognitive impairment at high risk of transitioning to Alzheimer's disease using routinely collected data.","authors":"Sreevani Katabathula, Mark Gurney, George Perry, Pamela B Davis, Rong Xu","doi":"10.1177/13872877251351622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a heterogeneous condition with variable progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Identifying MCI individuals at high risk for progression typically requires cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which are costly and invasive.ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a cost-effective approach using routinely collected clinical data to identify a subgroup of MCI individuals at high risk for AD progression.MethodsAnalyses were conducted using the UK Biobank dataset, focusing on 1019 participants identified as having MCI, using the ICD-10 code F06.7 (mild neurocognitive disorder due to known physiological condition) in the absence of a dedicated diagnostic code for MCI. Participants (mean age = 71.7 years; 44% women) were characterized using routinely recorded demographic, comorbidity, and lifestyle data. A mixed-data clustering model was applied to classify individuals into subgroups. Clinical relevance of each cluster was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of MCI-to-AD progression over an average follow-up of 4.5 years.ResultsThree subtypes were identified with distinct progression risks: high-risk (HR), medium-risk (MR), and low-risk (LR). The HR subtype had significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (98%), cardiovascular disease (89%), diabetes (48%), and high cholesterol (67%) than MR and LR (p < 0.05). The HR group was younger on average but had greater comorbidity burden and higher likelihood of AD progression.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of using routinely collected data to identify high-risk MCI individuals. This approach offers a practical preliminary screening tool to prioritize individuals for targeted interventions and further specialized assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251351622"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251351622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a heterogeneous condition with variable progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Identifying MCI individuals at high risk for progression typically requires cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which are costly and invasive.ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a cost-effective approach using routinely collected clinical data to identify a subgroup of MCI individuals at high risk for AD progression.MethodsAnalyses were conducted using the UK Biobank dataset, focusing on 1019 participants identified as having MCI, using the ICD-10 code F06.7 (mild neurocognitive disorder due to known physiological condition) in the absence of a dedicated diagnostic code for MCI. Participants (mean age = 71.7 years; 44% women) were characterized using routinely recorded demographic, comorbidity, and lifestyle data. A mixed-data clustering model was applied to classify individuals into subgroups. Clinical relevance of each cluster was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of MCI-to-AD progression over an average follow-up of 4.5 years.ResultsThree subtypes were identified with distinct progression risks: high-risk (HR), medium-risk (MR), and low-risk (LR). The HR subtype had significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (98%), cardiovascular disease (89%), diabetes (48%), and high cholesterol (67%) than MR and LR (p < 0.05). The HR group was younger on average but had greater comorbidity burden and higher likelihood of AD progression.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of using routinely collected data to identify high-risk MCI individuals. This approach offers a practical preliminary screening tool to prioritize individuals for targeted interventions and further specialized assessments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.