Construction of Personalized Predictive Models for Missed Medication Doses Using Wearable Device Data: Prospective Observational Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Haru Iino, Hayato Kizaki, Shungo Imai, Satoko Hori
{"title":"Construction of Personalized Predictive Models for Missed Medication Doses Using Wearable Device Data: Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Haru Iino, Hayato Kizaki, Shungo Imai, Satoko Hori","doi":"10.2196/72113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Declining medication adherence remains a critical health care issue, often assessed through unreliable self-reporting methods. Wearable devices (WDs) may offer an objective means to improve adherence monitoring by continuously recording physiological and activity data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and internally validate personalized predictive models, utilizing objective physiological and activity data from WDs, for identifying missed medication doses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 30-day prospective observational study was conducted with 8 participants who wore Apple Watches and used a dedicated iOS app. The app collected demographics, medication details, psychological factors, mealtimes, and daily missed dose events. WDs recorded time-series data (ie, activity, heart rate, sleep) at 3-minute intervals. Data were aggregated into 1-hour segments, and lag (6 and 12 h) as well as rolling (24 h) features were generated. Light Gradient Boosting Machine models were constructed for each individual's dosing regimen if the missed dose rate exceeded 20%. Two modeling approaches were compared: a group cross-validation (CV) model that grouped data by day to avoid data leakage from rolling features, and a nonrolling feature model that excluded rolling features and used leave-one-out CV. F1-score, accuracy, recall, and precision were assessed between the 2 models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 15 enrolled participants, 8 completed the study; 4 had a missed dose rate above 20%. In these 4 individuals, the group CV model achieved F1-scores of 0.435 to 0.902, with accuracy ranging from 0.711 to 0.911, recall from 0.278 to 0.822, and a precision of 1.000 for the most robust regimens. The nonrolling feature model yielded F1-scores of 0.667 to 0.910, with accuracy ranging from 0.800 to 0.906, recall from 0.500 to 0.835, and a precision of 1.000. Morning dosing regimens generally showed higher predictive performance than evening or afternoon. Time-series features, particularly those reflecting 6-, 12-, and 24-hour patterns, emerged as key predictors, indicating that physiological and lifestyle variations prior to dosing strongly influenced missed dose events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Personalized predictive models using WD-derived data demonstrated high precision for detecting missed medication doses, especially in morning and evening regimens. These findings underscore the feasibility of employing continuous, objective physiological and activity data from WDs to forecast nonadherence events. Although the sample size was limited, restricting the generalizability of the results, this study demonstrates the potential of WD-based personalized prediction of medication adherence. Future work should involve larger populations for external validation, strategies to improve recall, especially for clinically critical medications, and careful consideration of real-world implementation challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e72113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12212888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Declining medication adherence remains a critical health care issue, often assessed through unreliable self-reporting methods. Wearable devices (WDs) may offer an objective means to improve adherence monitoring by continuously recording physiological and activity data.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and internally validate personalized predictive models, utilizing objective physiological and activity data from WDs, for identifying missed medication doses.

Methods: A 30-day prospective observational study was conducted with 8 participants who wore Apple Watches and used a dedicated iOS app. The app collected demographics, medication details, psychological factors, mealtimes, and daily missed dose events. WDs recorded time-series data (ie, activity, heart rate, sleep) at 3-minute intervals. Data were aggregated into 1-hour segments, and lag (6 and 12 h) as well as rolling (24 h) features were generated. Light Gradient Boosting Machine models were constructed for each individual's dosing regimen if the missed dose rate exceeded 20%. Two modeling approaches were compared: a group cross-validation (CV) model that grouped data by day to avoid data leakage from rolling features, and a nonrolling feature model that excluded rolling features and used leave-one-out CV. F1-score, accuracy, recall, and precision were assessed between the 2 models.

Results: Of the 15 enrolled participants, 8 completed the study; 4 had a missed dose rate above 20%. In these 4 individuals, the group CV model achieved F1-scores of 0.435 to 0.902, with accuracy ranging from 0.711 to 0.911, recall from 0.278 to 0.822, and a precision of 1.000 for the most robust regimens. The nonrolling feature model yielded F1-scores of 0.667 to 0.910, with accuracy ranging from 0.800 to 0.906, recall from 0.500 to 0.835, and a precision of 1.000. Morning dosing regimens generally showed higher predictive performance than evening or afternoon. Time-series features, particularly those reflecting 6-, 12-, and 24-hour patterns, emerged as key predictors, indicating that physiological and lifestyle variations prior to dosing strongly influenced missed dose events.

Conclusions: Personalized predictive models using WD-derived data demonstrated high precision for detecting missed medication doses, especially in morning and evening regimens. These findings underscore the feasibility of employing continuous, objective physiological and activity data from WDs to forecast nonadherence events. Although the sample size was limited, restricting the generalizability of the results, this study demonstrates the potential of WD-based personalized prediction of medication adherence. Future work should involve larger populations for external validation, strategies to improve recall, especially for clinically critical medications, and careful consideration of real-world implementation challenges.

利用可穿戴设备数据构建漏用药剂量个性化预测模型:前瞻性观察研究
背景:药物依从性下降仍然是一个关键的卫生保健问题,通常通过不可靠的自我报告方法进行评估。可穿戴设备(WDs)可以通过连续记录生理和活动数据,提供客观的手段来改善依从性监测。目的:本研究旨在开发并内部验证个性化预测模型,利用WDs的客观生理和活动数据来识别漏给的药物剂量。方法:对8名佩戴苹果手表并使用专用iOS应用程序的参与者进行了一项为期30天的前瞻性观察研究。该应用程序收集了人口统计数据、用药细节、心理因素、用餐时间和每日遗漏剂量事件。WDs每隔3分钟记录一次时间序列数据(即活动、心率、睡眠)。将数据汇总为1小时段,生成滞后(6、12小时)和滚动(24小时)特征。如果漏给率超过20%,则为每个个体的给药方案构建光梯度增强机模型。比较了两种建模方法:一种是分组交叉验证(CV)模型,该模型按天分组数据以避免滚动特征的数据泄漏,另一种是非滚动特征模型,该模型排除了滚动特征并使用留一CV。对两种模型的f1评分、准确率、召回率和准确率进行评估。结果:在15名入组参与者中,8人完成了研究;漏给率在20%以上的4例。在这4个个体中,群体CV模型的f1得分为0.435至0.902,准确率为0.711至0.911,召回率为0.278至0.822,最稳健方案的精度为1.000。非滚动特征模型的f1得分为0.667 ~ 0.910,准确率为0.800 ~ 0.906,召回率为0.500 ~ 0.835,精度为1.000。上午给药方案通常比晚上或下午表现出更高的预测性能。时间序列特征,特别是那些反映6、12和24小时模式的时间序列特征,成为关键的预测因素,表明给药前的生理和生活方式变化强烈影响未给药事件。结论:使用wd衍生数据的个性化预测模型在检测漏用药剂量方面具有很高的精度,特别是在早晨和晚上的方案中。这些发现强调了使用WDs的连续、客观的生理和活动数据来预测不依从事件的可行性。虽然样本量有限,限制了结果的普遍性,但本研究显示了基于wd的药物依从性个性化预测的潜力。未来的工作应该包括更大的人群进行外部验证,提高召回率的策略,特别是临床关键药物,并仔细考虑现实世界的实施挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信