Evidence-based practice of exercise during dialysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s11255-025-04624-w
Xinjie Xiang, Junfeng Zhang, Hong Lin, Jincan Mai, Taorong Xu
{"title":"Evidence-based practice of exercise during dialysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients.","authors":"Xinjie Xiang, Junfeng Zhang, Hong Lin, Jincan Mai, Taorong Xu","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04624-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a standardized evidence-based practice plan for exercise during dialysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients based on the best evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the Johns Hopkins evidence-based nursing practice model as theoretical guidance, the evidence of exercise during dialysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients was systematically retrieved, evaluated and summarized, and an evidence-based practice plan was formed and applied in clinical practice. 35 patients and 19 nurses were reviewed before and after the application of evidence, and the obstacle factors and improvement measures were discussed and analyzed. The effect and significance of the evidence application were analyzed by comparing the patients' grip strength, 30-s sit-to-stand test, quality of life score, self-efficacy, and dialysis adequacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extracted 28 pieces of evidence from 35 best evidence sources and 8 review indicators were formulated. Following the implementation of evidence-based practices, the adherence rates for the eight indicators showed significant improvement (P < 0.05). The analysis identified 12 barriers and 12 facilitators, leading to the development of 16 change strategies. Before and 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after the application of evidence, the patients' grip strength, 30-s sit-to-stand test and quality of life score were compared, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in self-efficacy and dialysis adequacy (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence-based practice of intradialytic exercise in maintenance hemodialysis patients can standardize intradialytic exercise rehabilitation. It can improve the muscle strength of upper and lower limbs and the quality of life of patients. However, its effect on self-efficacy and dialysis adequacy is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"3851-3865"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04624-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a standardized evidence-based practice plan for exercise during dialysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients based on the best evidence.

Methods: Based on the Johns Hopkins evidence-based nursing practice model as theoretical guidance, the evidence of exercise during dialysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients was systematically retrieved, evaluated and summarized, and an evidence-based practice plan was formed and applied in clinical practice. 35 patients and 19 nurses were reviewed before and after the application of evidence, and the obstacle factors and improvement measures were discussed and analyzed. The effect and significance of the evidence application were analyzed by comparing the patients' grip strength, 30-s sit-to-stand test, quality of life score, self-efficacy, and dialysis adequacy.

Results: Extracted 28 pieces of evidence from 35 best evidence sources and 8 review indicators were formulated. Following the implementation of evidence-based practices, the adherence rates for the eight indicators showed significant improvement (P < 0.05). The analysis identified 12 barriers and 12 facilitators, leading to the development of 16 change strategies. Before and 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after the application of evidence, the patients' grip strength, 30-s sit-to-stand test and quality of life score were compared, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in self-efficacy and dialysis adequacy (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Evidence-based practice of intradialytic exercise in maintenance hemodialysis patients can standardize intradialytic exercise rehabilitation. It can improve the muscle strength of upper and lower limbs and the quality of life of patients. However, its effect on self-efficacy and dialysis adequacy is limited.

维持性血液透析患者透析期间运动的循证实践。
目的:基于最佳证据,制定维持性血液透析患者透析期间运动的规范化循证实践计划。方法:以约翰霍普金斯循证护理实践模型为理论指导,系统检索、评价和总结维持性血液透析患者透析期间运动的证据,形成循证实践计划并应用于临床实践。对35例患者和19名护士应用证据前后的情况进行回顾,并对障碍因素及改进措施进行探讨和分析。通过对比患者握力、30 s坐立测试、生活质量评分、自我效能感、透析充分性等指标,分析证据应用的效果及意义。结果:从35个最佳证据来源中提取了28条证据,制定了8个评价指标。实施循证实践后,8项指标的依从率均有显著提高(P < 0.05)。结论:维持性血液透析患者透析内运动循证实践可规范透析内运动康复。可提高患者的上肢和下肢肌肉力量,提高患者的生活质量。然而,其对自我效能和透析充分性的影响是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信