The patient perspective on use of Omalizumab in the in-hospital setting.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Irish Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s11845-025-03978-5
Lara Dungan, Fiona Little, Niamh O'Connor, Fionnuala Cox
{"title":"The patient perspective on use of Omalizumab in the in-hospital setting.","authors":"Lara Dungan, Fiona Little, Niamh O'Connor, Fionnuala Cox","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03978-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), allergic asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. While self-administration is licensed in Ireland, reimbursement restrictions require hospital-based delivery, placing significant burdens on patients and healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate patient perspectives on hospital-based administration of Omalizumab, and assess the practical, financial, and environmental implications of current practices, alongside interest in transitioning to home-based therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients receiving Omalizumab in a tertiary referral hospital between December 2024 and January 2025. Eligible participants (n=49) completed a 20- question anonymous questionnaire exploring demographics, treatment burden, and attitudes toward home therapy. Cost data were obtained from institutional finance records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 49 respondents (98% response rate), 46.9% reported personal costs of €11-€50 per hospital visit, with some incurring over €1,300 annually. Over one quarter (26.5%) missed more than 11 workdays per year due to treatment. Most travelled by private vehicle, generating an estimated 2.1 tonnes of CO₂ annually. A majority (77.5%) would prefer home therapy, citing convenience, flexibility, and reduced financial burden. Annual institutional costs for hospital-based administration of Omalizumab exceeded €1 million, excluding drug expenditure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospital-based administration of Omalizumab imposes significant patient and system-level costs. These findings support a transition to reimbursed self-administration at home, which may improve patient satisfaction, reduce absenteeism, minimise environmental impact, and achieve considerable healthcare savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"793-795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03978-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), allergic asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. While self-administration is licensed in Ireland, reimbursement restrictions require hospital-based delivery, placing significant burdens on patients and healthcare services.

Aims: To evaluate patient perspectives on hospital-based administration of Omalizumab, and assess the practical, financial, and environmental implications of current practices, alongside interest in transitioning to home-based therapy.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients receiving Omalizumab in a tertiary referral hospital between December 2024 and January 2025. Eligible participants (n=49) completed a 20- question anonymous questionnaire exploring demographics, treatment burden, and attitudes toward home therapy. Cost data were obtained from institutional finance records.

Results: Among 49 respondents (98% response rate), 46.9% reported personal costs of €11-€50 per hospital visit, with some incurring over €1,300 annually. Over one quarter (26.5%) missed more than 11 workdays per year due to treatment. Most travelled by private vehicle, generating an estimated 2.1 tonnes of CO₂ annually. A majority (77.5%) would prefer home therapy, citing convenience, flexibility, and reduced financial burden. Annual institutional costs for hospital-based administration of Omalizumab exceeded €1 million, excluding drug expenditure.

Conclusions: Hospital-based administration of Omalizumab imposes significant patient and system-level costs. These findings support a transition to reimbursed self-administration at home, which may improve patient satisfaction, reduce absenteeism, minimise environmental impact, and achieve considerable healthcare savings.

患者对院内使用Omalizumab的看法
背景:Omalizumab被批准用于治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)、过敏性哮喘和慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉。虽然爱尔兰允许自行用药,但报销限制要求在医院分娩,这给患者和医疗保健服务带来了沉重负担。目的:评估患者对以医院为基础的Omalizumab管理的看法,评估当前实践的实际、财务和环境影响,以及对过渡到以家庭为基础的治疗的兴趣。方法:对2024年12月至2025年1月在某三级转诊医院接受Omalizumab治疗的患者进行横断面调查。符合条件的参与者(n=49)完成了一份20个问题的匿名问卷,调查人口统计学、治疗负担和对家庭治疗的态度。成本数据来自机构财务记录。结果:在49名受访者(98%的回复率)中,46.9%的人报告每次医院就诊的个人费用为11- 50欧元,有些人每年的费用超过1,300欧元。超过四分之一(26.5%)的患者每年因治疗缺课超过11个工作日。大多数人乘坐私家车出行,估计每年产生2.1吨二氧化碳。大多数人(77.5%)更喜欢家庭治疗,理由是方便、灵活、减轻经济负担。医院管理Omalizumab的年度机构费用超过100万欧元,不包括药物支出。结论:以医院为基础的Omalizumab管理增加了显著的患者和系统层面的成本。这些发现支持向自费在家管理过渡,这可能提高患者满意度,减少缺勤,最大限度地减少对环境的影响,并实现可观的医疗节约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信