Comparative Control of Phyllotreta striolata: Growth-Inhibiting Effects of Chemical Insecticides Versus the Green Advantages of a Biopesticide.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Insects Pub Date : 2025-05-23 DOI:10.3390/insects16060552
Fuyong Lin, Musa Hassan Muhammad, Yufei Mao, Fan Zhao, Zixuan Wang, Yongcong Hong, Pumo Cai, Xiong Guan, Tianpei Huang
{"title":"Comparative Control of <i>Phyllotreta striolata</i>: Growth-Inhibiting Effects of Chemical Insecticides Versus the Green Advantages of a Biopesticide.","authors":"Fuyong Lin, Musa Hassan Muhammad, Yufei Mao, Fan Zhao, Zixuan Wang, Yongcong Hong, Pumo Cai, Xiong Guan, Tianpei Huang","doi":"10.3390/insects16060552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Phyllotreta striolata</i> is a major pest of <i>Brassica chinensis</i>, with chemical pesticides being the primary method for pest control. However, their negative impact on crop growth and environmental risks have prompted the search for low-toxicity, environmentally friendly alternatives. This study systematically evaluates the control effectiveness of two commonly used chemical pesticides, Zu Jia<sup>®</sup> and Jie Tiao<sup>®</sup>, along with their impact on the growth characteristics of <i>B. chinensis</i> and compares them to the biopesticide <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> (Bt) strain G033A. The control efficacy was assessed by measuring the insect population reduction rate and plant physiological indicators (weight, plant height, chlorophyll content, and root length). The differences between biopesticide and the two chemical pesticide treatments were analyzed. The results indicated that both Bt strain G033A and the chemical pesticides significantly controlled <i>P. striolata</i>. However, chemical pesticides (Zu Jia<sup>®</sup> and Jie Tiao<sup>®</sup>) significantly reduced the chlorophyll content, plant height, and weight of <i>B. chinensis</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas Bt strain G033A had no significant adverse effects on these plant traits (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The colonization characteristics of the Bt strain suggest potential for sustained pest control, while chemical pesticides exhibited rapid pest suppression effects. The findings highlight a novel IPM strategy that integrates the long-lasting efficacy of Bt biopesticides with the rapid action of chemical pesticides, offering a more sustainable and balanced approach to <i>P. striolata</i> management in <i>B. chinensis</i> cultivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13642,"journal":{"name":"Insects","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insects","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phyllotreta striolata is a major pest of Brassica chinensis, with chemical pesticides being the primary method for pest control. However, their negative impact on crop growth and environmental risks have prompted the search for low-toxicity, environmentally friendly alternatives. This study systematically evaluates the control effectiveness of two commonly used chemical pesticides, Zu Jia® and Jie Tiao®, along with their impact on the growth characteristics of B. chinensis and compares them to the biopesticide Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) strain G033A. The control efficacy was assessed by measuring the insect population reduction rate and plant physiological indicators (weight, plant height, chlorophyll content, and root length). The differences between biopesticide and the two chemical pesticide treatments were analyzed. The results indicated that both Bt strain G033A and the chemical pesticides significantly controlled P. striolata. However, chemical pesticides (Zu Jia® and Jie Tiao®) significantly reduced the chlorophyll content, plant height, and weight of B. chinensis (p < 0.05), whereas Bt strain G033A had no significant adverse effects on these plant traits (p > 0.05). The colonization characteristics of the Bt strain suggest potential for sustained pest control, while chemical pesticides exhibited rapid pest suppression effects. The findings highlight a novel IPM strategy that integrates the long-lasting efficacy of Bt biopesticides with the rapid action of chemical pesticides, offering a more sustainable and balanced approach to P. striolata management in B. chinensis cultivation.

黄曲跳甲的比较防治:化学杀虫剂对黄曲跳甲生长的抑制作用与生物农药的绿色优势。
黄曲跳甲是中国芸苔属植物的主要害虫,化学农药是主要的防治方法。然而,它们对作物生长的负面影响和环境风险促使人们寻找低毒、环保的替代品。本研究系统评价了两种常用化学农药祖佳®和洁条®的防治效果及其对中国白僵菌生长特性的影响,并与苏云金芽孢杆菌(Bacillus thuringiensis, Bt)菌株G033A进行比较。通过测定昆虫种群减少率和植物生理指标(株重、株高、叶绿素含量、根长)来评价防治效果。分析了生物农药与两种化学农药处理的差异。结果表明,Bt菌株G033A和化学农药对黄曲霉均有显著的防治作用。化学农药(Zu Jia®和Jie Tiao®)显著降低了白羊草的叶绿素含量、株高和株重(p < 0.05),而Bt菌株G033A对这些性状无显著影响(p < 0.05)。Bt菌株的定植特性表明其具有持续控制害虫的潜力,而化学农药具有快速抑制害虫的作用。研究结果表明,结合Bt生物农药的长效效应和化学农药的快速作用,可以建立一种新的综合治理策略,为中国黄曲霉的种植管理提供一种更加可持续和平衡的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insects
Insects Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1013
审稿时长
21.77 days
期刊介绍: Insects (ISSN 2075-4450) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of entomology published by MDPI online quarterly. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications related to the biology, physiology and the behavior of insects and arthropods. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信