Impaired instance acquisition as a cause of the comorbidity of learning disorders in young adults.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1560362
Chiara Valeria Marinelli, Giuliana Nardacchione, Marialuisa Martelli, Vincenza Tommasi, Marco Turi, Paola Angelelli, Pierpaolo Limone, Pierluigi Zoccolotti
{"title":"Impaired instance acquisition as a cause of the comorbidity of learning disorders in young adults.","authors":"Chiara Valeria Marinelli, Giuliana Nardacchione, Marialuisa Martelli, Vincenza Tommasi, Marco Turi, Paola Angelelli, Pierpaolo Limone, Pierluigi Zoccolotti","doi":"10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1560362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The \"<i>instance theory of automatization</i>\" suggests that automaticity relies on acquiring specific instances that enhance performance, preventing the slower application of procedures. It has been proposed that a low ability in instance acquisition may be the key cause of the comorbidity among learning disorders. We investigated performance on a learning task to test the hypothesis that difficulties in acquiring and consolidating instances would be linked with comorbid learning disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the individual rate of learning of 143 young adults with typical development (32M, 111F, mean age: 20.3) and 59 with specific learning disorders (SLD; 12M and 47F, mean age: 20.9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups significantly reduced their response times across learning trials (following a power trend) without generalization to untrained items, indicating that learning occurred through instance acquisition. Initially, participants with SLD performed worse than the controls. However, they reduced their times by about 96 sec with practice, even though their \"endpoint\" (asymptote) remained slower than controls. Group differences were related to these two scaling values, not the power curve coefficient. Subsequently, we reclassified the sample into three groups based on the type of deficit: one without procedural/instance deficits (\"Control\" group), one with selective deficits in \"procedural\" tasks (\"Poor procedural\" group), and one with deficits in instance-based tasks (\"Poor instance\" group). The poor instance group not only showed deficits across all tasks requiring instance retrieval (i.e., arithmetical facts and lexical representation retrieval) but was also slower (86 s) in the learning task compared to the other groups (58 and 70 s, respectively; at least <i>p</i> < 0.01). The \"Poor procedural\" group behaved similarly to the \"Control\" group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results support with the notion that a low ability to acquire and consolidate instances may contribute to the comorbidity of learning disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12368,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1560362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1560362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The "instance theory of automatization" suggests that automaticity relies on acquiring specific instances that enhance performance, preventing the slower application of procedures. It has been proposed that a low ability in instance acquisition may be the key cause of the comorbidity among learning disorders. We investigated performance on a learning task to test the hypothesis that difficulties in acquiring and consolidating instances would be linked with comorbid learning disorders.

Methods: We examined the individual rate of learning of 143 young adults with typical development (32M, 111F, mean age: 20.3) and 59 with specific learning disorders (SLD; 12M and 47F, mean age: 20.9).

Results: Both groups significantly reduced their response times across learning trials (following a power trend) without generalization to untrained items, indicating that learning occurred through instance acquisition. Initially, participants with SLD performed worse than the controls. However, they reduced their times by about 96 sec with practice, even though their "endpoint" (asymptote) remained slower than controls. Group differences were related to these two scaling values, not the power curve coefficient. Subsequently, we reclassified the sample into three groups based on the type of deficit: one without procedural/instance deficits ("Control" group), one with selective deficits in "procedural" tasks ("Poor procedural" group), and one with deficits in instance-based tasks ("Poor instance" group). The poor instance group not only showed deficits across all tasks requiring instance retrieval (i.e., arithmetical facts and lexical representation retrieval) but was also slower (86 s) in the learning task compared to the other groups (58 and 70 s, respectively; at least p < 0.01). The "Poor procedural" group behaved similarly to the "Control" group.

Conclusion: Results support with the notion that a low ability to acquire and consolidate instances may contribute to the comorbidity of learning disorders.

实例习得受损是年轻人学习障碍共病的一个原因。
引言:“自动化的实例理论”认为,自动化依赖于获取特定的实例来提高性能,防止程序的缓慢应用。有研究认为,实例习得能力低下可能是导致学习障碍共病的主要原因。我们调查了学习任务的表现,以检验获取和巩固实例的困难与共病学习障碍有关的假设。方法:对143例典型发育青年(32M, 111F,平均年龄20.3岁)和59例特殊学习障碍(SLD;12岁和47岁,平均年龄:20.9岁)。结果:两组在学习试验中的反应时间均显著缩短(服从幂趋势),但未将其推广到未训练的项目,表明学习是通过实例获取发生的。最初,患有SLD的参与者的表现比对照组差。然而,通过练习,他们的时间减少了大约96秒,尽管他们的“终点”(渐近线)仍然比对照组慢。组间差异与这两个标度值有关,与功率曲线系数无关。随后,我们根据缺陷类型将样本重新分为三组:一组没有程序/实例缺陷(“对照组”),一组在“程序”任务中有选择性缺陷(“程序差”组),以及一组在基于实例的任务中有缺陷(“实例差”组)。实例组不仅在所有需要实例检索的任务(即算术事实和词汇表示检索)上表现出缺陷,而且在学习任务上也比其他组慢(分别为58秒和70秒);至少p < 0.01)。“程序差”组的表现与“对照组”相似。结论:研究结果支持了低获取和巩固实例的能力可能导致学习障碍的共病的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying behavior. Field Chief Editor Nuno Sousa at the Instituto de Pesquisa em Ciências da Vida e da Saúde (ICVS) is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. This journal publishes major insights into the neural mechanisms of animal and human behavior, and welcomes articles studying the interplay between behavior and its neurobiological basis at all levels: from molecular biology and genetics, to morphological, biochemical, neurochemical, electrophysiological, neuroendocrine, pharmacological, and neuroimaging studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信