{"title":"Maintenance therapy after ASCT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: single agent <i>versus</i> combination drugs.","authors":"Enrica Antonia Martino, Ernesto Vigna, Caterina Labanca, Antonella Bruzzese, Francesco Mendicino, Giulio Caridà, Eugenio Lucia, Virginia Olivito, Noemi Puccio, Nicola Amodio, Antonino Neri, Fortunato Morabito, Massimo Gentile","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2525457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maintenance therapy plays a crucial role in prolonging progression-free survival and overall survival in multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide remains the gold standard, as demonstrated in phase 3 trials, consistently showing superior survival compared to observation or placebo. However, both established and novel agents - such as thalidomide and pomalidomide, proteasome inhibitors (PIs), monoclonal antibodies (moAbs), and bispecific antibodies - have been investigated as alternatives to assess their efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review delivers a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of maintenance strategies in MM and presents the available evidence supporting the efficacy of novel agents, both as monotherapy and in combination.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Maintenance therapy is a critical component of MM management, capable of improving disease control and survival. Lenalidomide has demonstrated its ability to extend patients' survival, but cumulative toxicity remains a significant concern. For high-risk patients, maintenance therapy with PIs and CD38-targeting moAbs has proven to improve outcomes. However, challenges such as quality of life, cost, accessibility, and treatment resistance persist. A minimal residual disease (MRD)-adapted maintenance strategy is desirable, particularly to enable personalized treatment approaches in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2525457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Maintenance therapy plays a crucial role in prolonging progression-free survival and overall survival in multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide remains the gold standard, as demonstrated in phase 3 trials, consistently showing superior survival compared to observation or placebo. However, both established and novel agents - such as thalidomide and pomalidomide, proteasome inhibitors (PIs), monoclonal antibodies (moAbs), and bispecific antibodies - have been investigated as alternatives to assess their efficacy and safety.
Areas covered: This review delivers a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of maintenance strategies in MM and presents the available evidence supporting the efficacy of novel agents, both as monotherapy and in combination.
Expert opinion: Maintenance therapy is a critical component of MM management, capable of improving disease control and survival. Lenalidomide has demonstrated its ability to extend patients' survival, but cumulative toxicity remains a significant concern. For high-risk patients, maintenance therapy with PIs and CD38-targeting moAbs has proven to improve outcomes. However, challenges such as quality of life, cost, accessibility, and treatment resistance persist. A minimal residual disease (MRD)-adapted maintenance strategy is desirable, particularly to enable personalized treatment approaches in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.