Enhanced Recovery after Fetal Sequencing: A Perinatal Genomic Scoping Review of Exome/Genome Testing for Reproductive/Obstetric-MFM Providers to Initiate Knowledge Translation following a Screening Ultrasound Identifying Fetal Anomalies.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Robert Douglas Wilson
{"title":"Enhanced Recovery after Fetal Sequencing: A Perinatal Genomic Scoping Review of Exome/Genome Testing for Reproductive/Obstetric-MFM Providers to Initiate Knowledge Translation following a Screening Ultrasound Identifying Fetal Anomalies.","authors":"Robert Douglas Wilson","doi":"10.1159/000546993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This review of genomic perinatal opportunities and uses will provide counseling and personal genetic knowledge for improved patient care.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This focused systematic analysis and review has used PubMed keywords to identify genomic testing for ultrasound-identified fetal anomaly(ies) that require diagnostic testing after an informed consent process. Multiple fetal anomalies, using TRIO sequencing processes, have a better diagnostic yield, with certain cohorts >50%. For the single anatomic categories, skeletal system, central nervous system, and renal system, using WES fetal sequencing (most commonly) for a diagnostic result, have the larger incremental diagnostic yield over the chromosome micro-array.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The phenotype-genotype (fetal-genomic result) consideration and use of the prenatal exome sequencing technology can be summarized using a SWOT analysis: strength (enhanced evaluation of fetal-neonatal genomic abnormalities not identified by standard chromosomal microarray and improved ethical care decisions); weakness (the understanding and complexity of genomic pathology and testing/the fiscal cost for professional time and the health system services); opportunity (an increased recognition of fetal genetic risk pathology [de novo or inherited carrier mutations] with improved understanding and knowledge translation of counseling for recurrence risk); threat (inability to provide a genetic diagnosis or interpret a variant of unknown significance or the discovery of incidental findings or unanticipated parental genomic diagnoses).</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This review of genomic perinatal opportunities and uses will provide counseling and personal genetic knowledge for improved patient care.

Summary: This focused systematic analysis and review has used PubMed keywords to identify genomic testing for ultrasound-identified fetal anomaly(ies) that require diagnostic testing after an informed consent process. Multiple fetal anomalies, using TRIO sequencing processes, have a better diagnostic yield, with certain cohorts >50%. For the single anatomic categories, skeletal system, central nervous system, and renal system, using WES fetal sequencing (most commonly) for a diagnostic result, have the larger incremental diagnostic yield over the chromosome micro-array.

Key messages: The phenotype-genotype (fetal-genomic result) consideration and use of the prenatal exome sequencing technology can be summarized using a SWOT analysis: strength (enhanced evaluation of fetal-neonatal genomic abnormalities not identified by standard chromosomal microarray and improved ethical care decisions); weakness (the understanding and complexity of genomic pathology and testing/the fiscal cost for professional time and the health system services); opportunity (an increased recognition of fetal genetic risk pathology [de novo or inherited carrier mutations] with improved understanding and knowledge translation of counseling for recurrence risk); threat (inability to provide a genetic diagnosis or interpret a variant of unknown significance or the discovery of incidental findings or unanticipated parental genomic diagnoses).

胎儿测序后增强恢复:生殖/产科mfm提供者外显子组/基因组检测的围产期基因组范围回顾,以启动超声筛查识别胎儿异常后的知识翻译。
引言:本综述的基因组围产期机会和使用将提供咨询和个人遗传知识,以改善患者护理。M/M:这项集中的系统分析和综述使用PUBMED关键词来确定需要在知情同意程序后进行诊断测试的超声诊断胎儿异常(胎儿)的基因组检测。结果:多重胎儿异常,使用TRIO测序方法,有更好的诊断率,某些队列高达50%。对于单一解剖分类,骨骼、中枢神经系统和肾脏系统,使用WES胎儿测序(最常用)作为诊断结果,比CMA具有更大的增量诊断率。结论:pES技术的表型-基因型(胎儿-基因组结果)考虑和使用可以用SWOT分析来总结:优势(增强了对标准染色体微阵列未发现的胎儿-新生儿基因组异常的评估,改善了伦理护理决策);弱点(对基因组病理学和检测的理解和复杂性/专业时间和卫生系统服务的财政成本);机会(增加对胎儿遗传风险病理[新生或遗传性载体突变]的认识,提高对复发风险咨询的理解和知识转化);威胁(无法提供遗传诊断或解释未知意义的变异,或发现偶然发现或意外的亲代基因组诊断)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信