Next-generation sequencing of the tonsillar microbiome in severe acute tonsillitis: comparison with healthy controls and culture-based findings.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Camilla Andersen, Tine Sneibjerg Ebsen, Casper Aabrandt Thorup, Kasper Basse Reinholdt, Ann Marlene Gram Kjaerulff, Nichlas Udholm, Vesal Khalid, Adnan Madzak, Christophe Duez, Henrik Münch, Søren Pauli, Christian Sander Danstrup, Niels Krintel Petersen, Thomas Greve, Tejs Ehlers Klug
{"title":"Next-generation sequencing of the tonsillar microbiome in severe acute tonsillitis: comparison with healthy controls and culture-based findings.","authors":"Camilla Andersen, Tine Sneibjerg Ebsen, Casper Aabrandt Thorup, Kasper Basse Reinholdt, Ann Marlene Gram Kjaerulff, Nichlas Udholm, Vesal Khalid, Adnan Madzak, Christophe Duez, Henrik Münch, Søren Pauli, Christian Sander Danstrup, Niels Krintel Petersen, Thomas Greve, Tejs Ehlers Klug","doi":"10.1007/s10096-025-05195-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Previous culture-based studies suggest three significant pathogens in acute tonsillitis (AT): Streptococcus pyogenes, Fusobacterium necrophorum, and Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides further insights into the human microbiome and may pinpoint additional pathogens in bacterial infections. We aimed to investigate the tonsillar microbiome and identify pathogens associated with AT by applying NGS to tonsillar swabs from patients with severe AT, comparing the findings with both healthy controls and culture-based results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Full-length sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (16S tNGS) was performed on tonsillar swabs from 64 AT patients and 55 controls, who were prospectively enrolled at two Danish Ear-Nose-Throat Departments between June 2016 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of detected bacteria was significantly higher in patients analysed with 16S tNGS (36) than with culture methods (6.5, p < 0.001). The alpha diversity was lower in patients compared to controls (p < 0.001) and beta diversity showed separation of the two groups (p = 0.001). S. pyogenes (p = 0.001) and Bifidobacteriaceae (p = 0.002) were significantly more abundant in patients compared to controls. The three suggested pathogens were detected more frequently using 16S tNGS compared to culture: S. pyogenes (38% vs. 27%, p = 0.26), F. necrophorum (19% vs. 11%, p = 0.32), and S. dysgalactiae (14% vs. 11%, p = 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tonsillar microbiome differed significantly between AT patients and healthy controls. Our findings confirm the role of S. pyogenes in AT, but did not identify additional likely pathogens. The addition of 16S tNGS to cultures increased the collective detection rate of three previously suggested pathogens from 48 to 70%.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05195-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Previous culture-based studies suggest three significant pathogens in acute tonsillitis (AT): Streptococcus pyogenes, Fusobacterium necrophorum, and Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides further insights into the human microbiome and may pinpoint additional pathogens in bacterial infections. We aimed to investigate the tonsillar microbiome and identify pathogens associated with AT by applying NGS to tonsillar swabs from patients with severe AT, comparing the findings with both healthy controls and culture-based results.

Methods: Full-length sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (16S tNGS) was performed on tonsillar swabs from 64 AT patients and 55 controls, who were prospectively enrolled at two Danish Ear-Nose-Throat Departments between June 2016 and December 2019.

Results: The mean number of detected bacteria was significantly higher in patients analysed with 16S tNGS (36) than with culture methods (6.5, p < 0.001). The alpha diversity was lower in patients compared to controls (p < 0.001) and beta diversity showed separation of the two groups (p = 0.001). S. pyogenes (p = 0.001) and Bifidobacteriaceae (p = 0.002) were significantly more abundant in patients compared to controls. The three suggested pathogens were detected more frequently using 16S tNGS compared to culture: S. pyogenes (38% vs. 27%, p = 0.26), F. necrophorum (19% vs. 11%, p = 0.32), and S. dysgalactiae (14% vs. 11%, p = 0.79).

Conclusion: The tonsillar microbiome differed significantly between AT patients and healthy controls. Our findings confirm the role of S. pyogenes in AT, but did not identify additional likely pathogens. The addition of 16S tNGS to cultures increased the collective detection rate of three previously suggested pathogens from 48 to 70%.

严重急性扁桃体炎扁桃体微生物组的新一代测序:与健康对照和基于培养的结果的比较
目的:以往的基于培养的研究表明急性扁桃体炎(AT)有三种重要的病原体:化脓性链球菌、坏死梭杆菌和乳糖分泌不良链球菌。下一代测序(NGS)提供了对人类微生物组的进一步了解,并可能查明细菌感染中的其他病原体。我们的目的是通过将NGS应用于严重AT患者的扁桃体拭子来研究扁桃体微生物组并鉴定与AT相关的病原体,并将结果与健康对照组和基于培养的结果进行比较。方法:对64名AT患者和55名对照组的扁桃体拭子进行16S rRNA基因(16S tNGS)的全长测序,这些患者于2016年6月至2019年12月在丹麦的两个耳鼻喉科前瞻性招募。结果:采用16S tNGS法的患者平均检出细菌数(36)明显高于采用培养法的患者(6.5,p)。结论:AT患者与健康对照组扁桃体微生物组存在显著差异。我们的研究结果证实了化脓性链球菌在AT中的作用,但没有发现其他可能的病原体。将16S tNGS添加到培养物中,将先前建议的三种病原体的集体检出率从48%提高到70%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
138
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信