Using type 2 diabetes population data in general practice may affect workflow and clinical outcomes.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Trine Kjeldgaard Møller, Martin Riis Johansen, Ulla Bjerre-Christensen, Peter Lommer Kristensen
{"title":"Using type 2 diabetes population data in general practice may affect workflow and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Trine Kjeldgaard Møller, Martin Riis Johansen, Ulla Bjerre-Christensen, Peter Lommer Kristensen","doi":"10.61409/A11240795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies have demonstrated that electronic feedback utilising patient data from general practice may effectively promote adherence to treatment guidelines, making it a valuable tool for quality improvement. Therefore, we aimed to explore the effect of data-driven quality improvement in general practice on clinical outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 15 general practitioners participated in a quality development process with visits from an organisational advisor. Six other control clinics did not participate in the quality process. Diabetes-related data were gathered at baseline and after six and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention improved adherence to guidelines. We observed between-group effects for the proportion of annual control within 12 months, HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate measurements, the proportion of patients with LDL less-than 2.5 mmol/l and a reduction in patients with ischaemic heart disease and no secondary prevention treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention may represent an easy-to-implement solution to creating workflow routines by comprehensively analysing the patient population at the clinic level. However, selection bias may influence the results.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The study was funded by Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Regional ethics committee of the capital region (F-22073139).</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"72 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A11240795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have demonstrated that electronic feedback utilising patient data from general practice may effectively promote adherence to treatment guidelines, making it a valuable tool for quality improvement. Therefore, we aimed to explore the effect of data-driven quality improvement in general practice on clinical outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: A total of 15 general practitioners participated in a quality development process with visits from an organisational advisor. Six other control clinics did not participate in the quality process. Diabetes-related data were gathered at baseline and after six and 12 months.

Results: The intervention improved adherence to guidelines. We observed between-group effects for the proportion of annual control within 12 months, HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate measurements, the proportion of patients with LDL less-than 2.5 mmol/l and a reduction in patients with ischaemic heart disease and no secondary prevention treatment.

Conclusions: The intervention may represent an easy-to-implement solution to creating workflow routines by comprehensively analysing the patient population at the clinic level. However, selection bias may influence the results.

Funding: The study was funded by Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen.

Trial registration: Regional ethics committee of the capital region (F-22073139).

在一般实践中使用2型糖尿病人群数据可能会影响工作流程和临床结果。
研究表明,利用来自全科实践的患者数据的电子反馈可以有效地促进对治疗指南的遵守,使其成为提高质量的有价值的工具。因此,我们的目的是探讨数据驱动的质量改进在全科实践中对2型糖尿病患者临床结果的影响。方法:共有15名全科医生在组织顾问的访问下参与了质量发展过程。另外6家对照诊所没有参与质量过程。在基线、6个月和12个月后收集糖尿病相关数据。结果:干预提高了对指南的依从性。我们观察了12个月内年度控制比例、HbA1c、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)和肾小球滤过率估计值、LDL低于2.5 mmol/l的患者比例以及未进行二级预防治疗的缺血性心脏病患者的减少等组间效应。结论:通过全面分析临床水平的患者群体,干预可能是一种易于实施的解决方案,可以创建工作流程例程。然而,选择偏差可能会影响结果。资助:本研究由哥本哈根Steno糖尿病中心资助。试验注册:首都地区伦理委员会(F-22073139)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信