Trine Kjeldgaard Møller, Martin Riis Johansen, Ulla Bjerre-Christensen, Peter Lommer Kristensen
{"title":"Using type 2 diabetes population data in general practice may affect workflow and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Trine Kjeldgaard Møller, Martin Riis Johansen, Ulla Bjerre-Christensen, Peter Lommer Kristensen","doi":"10.61409/A11240795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies have demonstrated that electronic feedback utilising patient data from general practice may effectively promote adherence to treatment guidelines, making it a valuable tool for quality improvement. Therefore, we aimed to explore the effect of data-driven quality improvement in general practice on clinical outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 15 general practitioners participated in a quality development process with visits from an organisational advisor. Six other control clinics did not participate in the quality process. Diabetes-related data were gathered at baseline and after six and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention improved adherence to guidelines. We observed between-group effects for the proportion of annual control within 12 months, HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate measurements, the proportion of patients with LDL less-than 2.5 mmol/l and a reduction in patients with ischaemic heart disease and no secondary prevention treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention may represent an easy-to-implement solution to creating workflow routines by comprehensively analysing the patient population at the clinic level. However, selection bias may influence the results.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The study was funded by Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Regional ethics committee of the capital region (F-22073139).</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"72 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A11240795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Studies have demonstrated that electronic feedback utilising patient data from general practice may effectively promote adherence to treatment guidelines, making it a valuable tool for quality improvement. Therefore, we aimed to explore the effect of data-driven quality improvement in general practice on clinical outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: A total of 15 general practitioners participated in a quality development process with visits from an organisational advisor. Six other control clinics did not participate in the quality process. Diabetes-related data were gathered at baseline and after six and 12 months.
Results: The intervention improved adherence to guidelines. We observed between-group effects for the proportion of annual control within 12 months, HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate measurements, the proportion of patients with LDL less-than 2.5 mmol/l and a reduction in patients with ischaemic heart disease and no secondary prevention treatment.
Conclusions: The intervention may represent an easy-to-implement solution to creating workflow routines by comprehensively analysing the patient population at the clinic level. However, selection bias may influence the results.
Funding: The study was funded by Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen.
Trial registration: Regional ethics committee of the capital region (F-22073139).
期刊介绍:
The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content.
DMJ will publish the following articles:
• Original articles
• Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences
• DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.