Textbook Outcomes for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection: A Multi-Centre Review.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Skyle Murphy, Christopher Allan, Andrew Barbour, Victoria Donoghue, B Mark Smithers
{"title":"Textbook Outcomes for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection: A Multi-Centre Review.","authors":"Skyle Murphy, Christopher Allan, Andrew Barbour, Victoria Donoghue, B Mark Smithers","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32060364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs), en-bloc resection with macroscopically negative margins remains the only potentially curative treatment. Textbook outcomes (TOs) are composite measures developed to compare ideal surgical outcomes for complex oncologic resections. The aims of this study were as follows: to define TO for RPS resections; to investigate the impact of treating service and other variables on TO; and to investigate the impact of treating service on achieving a TO. Population-based data from the Queensland Oncology Repository (QOR) was used to perform a retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent resection for primary RPS in Queensland between 2012 and 2022. TO was defined as follows: en-bloc resection; macroscopically negative margins; no unplanned ICU admission, no Clavien-Dindo III or greater complications; hospital length of stay of 14 days or less; no readmission within 30 days; and no 90-day mortality. A TO was achieved in 82 (56.94%) of the 144 patients included in the study. A high-grade histological subtype, the resection of three or more contiguous organs, major vascular resection and treatment outside of a high-volume sarcoma centre (HVSC) were significant negative predictors of achieving TOs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, treatment at a high-volume sarcoma centre was independently associated with a 2.6-fold increase in TO (1.18-5.88, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Achieving a TO was associated with higher five-year DFS (61.5% vs. 41.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and OS (76% vs. 59.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). In our state, TOs provide a measure of the quality of RPS resection across multiple health services, with patients treated at high-volume sarcoma centres more likely to achieve a TO. TO rates are associated with improved five-year DFS and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs), en-bloc resection with macroscopically negative margins remains the only potentially curative treatment. Textbook outcomes (TOs) are composite measures developed to compare ideal surgical outcomes for complex oncologic resections. The aims of this study were as follows: to define TO for RPS resections; to investigate the impact of treating service and other variables on TO; and to investigate the impact of treating service on achieving a TO. Population-based data from the Queensland Oncology Repository (QOR) was used to perform a retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent resection for primary RPS in Queensland between 2012 and 2022. TO was defined as follows: en-bloc resection; macroscopically negative margins; no unplanned ICU admission, no Clavien-Dindo III or greater complications; hospital length of stay of 14 days or less; no readmission within 30 days; and no 90-day mortality. A TO was achieved in 82 (56.94%) of the 144 patients included in the study. A high-grade histological subtype, the resection of three or more contiguous organs, major vascular resection and treatment outside of a high-volume sarcoma centre (HVSC) were significant negative predictors of achieving TOs (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, treatment at a high-volume sarcoma centre was independently associated with a 2.6-fold increase in TO (1.18-5.88, p = 0.02). Achieving a TO was associated with higher five-year DFS (61.5% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.03) and OS (76% vs. 59.4%, p = 0.02). In our state, TOs provide a measure of the quality of RPS resection across multiple health services, with patients treated at high-volume sarcoma centres more likely to achieve a TO. TO rates are associated with improved five-year DFS and OS.

腹膜后肉瘤切除术的教科书预后:多中心回顾。
对于腹膜后肉瘤(rps)患者,整体切除与宏观阴性边缘仍然是唯一可能治愈的治疗方法。教科书结果(TOs)是用于比较复杂肿瘤切除的理想手术结果的综合措施。本研究的目的如下:定义RPS切除术的to;调查治疗服务和其他变量对to的影响;并调查治疗服务对实现目标的影响。来自昆士兰肿瘤学储存库(QOR)的基于人群的数据用于对2012年至2022年间在昆士兰接受原发性RPS切除术的所有成年患者进行回顾性审查。TO的定义为:整块切除;宏观上的负边际;无计划外ICU入院,无Clavien-Dindo III或更严重并发症;住院时间不超过14天;30天内不得再入境;也没有90天的死亡率。纳入研究的144例患者中有82例(56.94%)达到了TO。高级别组织学亚型、三个或更多相邻器官切除、大血管切除和大容量肉瘤中心(HVSC)外治疗是达到TOs的显著负向预测因子(p < 0.05)。在多变量分析中,在大容量肉瘤中心接受治疗与TO增加2.6倍独立相关(1.18-5.88,p = 0.02)。达到TO与更高的5年DFS(61.5%对41.3%,p = 0.03)和OS(76%对59.4%,p = 0.02)相关。在我们州,to为多个医疗服务机构的RPS切除质量提供了衡量标准,在大容量肉瘤中心接受治疗的患者更有可能获得to。TO率与改善的5年DFS和OS相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信