Oral Health Disparities in Type 2 Diabetes: Examining the Elevated Risk for Dental Caries-A Comparative Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
José Frias-Bulhosa, Maria Conceição Manso, Carla Lopes Mota, Paulo Melo
{"title":"Oral Health Disparities in Type 2 Diabetes: Examining the Elevated Risk for Dental Caries-A Comparative Study.","authors":"José Frias-Bulhosa, Maria Conceição Manso, Carla Lopes Mota, Paulo Melo","doi":"10.3390/dj13060258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Dental caries (DCs) and type 2 diabetes share common risk factors. Dental caries risk in type 2 diabetics (T2DM) shows contradictory results. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in DC prevalence in adults with and without T2DM and whether body mass index (BMI) classes or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels interfere in that difference. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 666 adults (n(T2DM) = 343; n(nT2DM) = 323), from Espinho Primary Health Care Center, were interviewed by calibrated observers. Data from clinical records were collected and oral health status was registered using WHO criteria. Inference analysis was conducted using non-parametric tests (α = 0.05). <b>Results</b>: A similar caries prevalence was found between the T2DM (98.2%) and nT2DM (98.8%) groups, with the T2DM group showing significantly higher tooth loss (<i>p</i> < 0.001), higher caries experience rerted as mean ± sd (17.7 ± 8.3 vs. 15.9 ± 7.8, <i>p</i> = 0.005), fewer decayed teeth (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and filled teeth (<i>p</i> = 0.016) compared to nT2DM. The most frequently identified comorbidity was hypertension (53.6%). Tobacco use (12.9%) was lower in T2DM (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The restorative and treatment indices indicated a significantly higher proportion of use of oral care services (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in T2DM individuals. The prevalence of the higher classes of BMI indicative of pre-obesity or obesity shows significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The differences found in the DMFT or each of its components for the prevalence or for the mean in HbA1c control were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.368, and 0.524, respectively). <b>Conclusions</b>: Adults with T2DM and higher BMI classes could be associated with a greater prevalence of DCs. The glycemic control of T2DM does not significantly influence DMFT score or each of its components.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13060258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Dental caries (DCs) and type 2 diabetes share common risk factors. Dental caries risk in type 2 diabetics (T2DM) shows contradictory results. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in DC prevalence in adults with and without T2DM and whether body mass index (BMI) classes or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels interfere in that difference. Methods: A total of 666 adults (n(T2DM) = 343; n(nT2DM) = 323), from Espinho Primary Health Care Center, were interviewed by calibrated observers. Data from clinical records were collected and oral health status was registered using WHO criteria. Inference analysis was conducted using non-parametric tests (α = 0.05). Results: A similar caries prevalence was found between the T2DM (98.2%) and nT2DM (98.8%) groups, with the T2DM group showing significantly higher tooth loss (p < 0.001), higher caries experience rerted as mean ± sd (17.7 ± 8.3 vs. 15.9 ± 7.8, p = 0.005), fewer decayed teeth (p < 0.001) and filled teeth (p = 0.016) compared to nT2DM. The most frequently identified comorbidity was hypertension (53.6%). Tobacco use (12.9%) was lower in T2DM (p < 0.001). The restorative and treatment indices indicated a significantly higher proportion of use of oral care services (p < 0.001) in T2DM individuals. The prevalence of the higher classes of BMI indicative of pre-obesity or obesity shows significant differences (p < 0.001). The differences found in the DMFT or each of its components for the prevalence or for the mean in HbA1c control were not statistically significant (p = 0.368, and 0.524, respectively). Conclusions: Adults with T2DM and higher BMI classes could be associated with a greater prevalence of DCs. The glycemic control of T2DM does not significantly influence DMFT score or each of its components.

2型糖尿病患者口腔健康差异:检查龋齿风险的升高——一项比较研究
背景/目的:龋齿和2型糖尿病具有共同的危险因素。2型糖尿病(T2DM)的龋齿风险显示出相互矛盾的结果。本研究的目的是确定患有和不患有2型糖尿病的成年人的DC患病率是否存在差异,以及体重指数(BMI)类别或糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平是否会干扰这种差异。方法:666例成人(n(T2DM) = 343例;n(nT2DM) = 323),来自埃斯皮尼奥初级卫生保健中心,由校准的观察员访谈。从临床记录中收集数据,并根据世卫组织标准登记口腔健康状况。采用非参数检验进行推断分析(α = 0.05)。结果:T2DM组与nT2DM组龋患病率相近(98.2%),T2DM组牙丢失明显高于nT2DM组(p < 0.001),平均±sd值(17.7±8.3 vs 15.9±7.8,p = 0.005)高于nT2DM组(p < 0.001),蛀牙和补牙较少(p = 0.016)。最常见的合并症是高血压(53.6%)。2型糖尿病患者吸烟(12.9%)较低(p < 0.001)。T2DM患者使用口腔护理服务的比例明显高于T2DM患者(p < 0.001)。表明肥胖前期或肥胖的较高BMI等级的患病率存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。DMFT或其各组成部分与HbA1c对照的患病率或平均值的差异无统计学意义(p分别为0.368和0.524)。结论:T2DM和高BMI分级的成人可能与更高的dc患病率相关。T2DM患者的血糖控制对DMFT评分及其各组成部分没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信