Scores for Risk Stratification of Pericarditis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Massimo Imazio, Alessandro Andreis, Allan Klein, George Lazaros, Emilia Lazarou, Valentino Collini
{"title":"Scores for Risk Stratification of Pericarditis.","authors":"Massimo Imazio, Alessandro Andreis, Allan Klein, George Lazaros, Emilia Lazarou, Valentino Collini","doi":"10.1007/s11886-025-02259-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review current available risk scores for pericarditis risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Four recent published scores have provided new clinical tools for the evaluation of risk of recurrent pericarditis after a first episode or acute pericarditis (Athens score) or complicated pericarditis (Torino score), diagnosis of pericarditis (pericarditis INFLA-score) or clinical remission (Cleveland Clinic/ Klein score). Recent scores for pericarditis diagnosis or risk stratification have been developed by tertiary referral centres with the aim of improving risk stratification and diagnosis and allowing an individualized approach for treatment and follow-up identifying the high-risk group of patients. While these scores are helpful in developing a more evidence-based approach for risk stratification of pericarditis, they have some limitations (single-centre, tertiary centres with referral bias, relatively limited sample size, new therapies not always included) and require further validation before clinical implementation in large unselected populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10829,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-025-02259-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review current available risk scores for pericarditis risk stratification.

Recent findings: Four recent published scores have provided new clinical tools for the evaluation of risk of recurrent pericarditis after a first episode or acute pericarditis (Athens score) or complicated pericarditis (Torino score), diagnosis of pericarditis (pericarditis INFLA-score) or clinical remission (Cleveland Clinic/ Klein score). Recent scores for pericarditis diagnosis or risk stratification have been developed by tertiary referral centres with the aim of improving risk stratification and diagnosis and allowing an individualized approach for treatment and follow-up identifying the high-risk group of patients. While these scores are helpful in developing a more evidence-based approach for risk stratification of pericarditis, they have some limitations (single-centre, tertiary centres with referral bias, relatively limited sample size, new therapies not always included) and require further validation before clinical implementation in large unselected populations.

心包炎危险分层评分。
回顾目的:回顾目前可用的心包炎风险分层风险评分。最近发现:最近发表的四项评分为评估首次发作后心包炎复发风险、急性心包炎(Athens评分)或并发心包炎(Torino评分)、心包炎诊断(心包炎infla评分)或临床缓解(Cleveland Clinic/ Klein评分)提供了新的临床工具。最近,三级转诊中心制定了心包炎诊断或风险分层评分,目的是改善风险分层和诊断,并允许采用个性化的治疗方法和随访,以确定高危患者群体。虽然这些评分有助于开发一种更循证的心包炎风险分层方法,但它们有一些局限性(单中心、三级中心有转诊偏倚、样本量相对有限、新疗法并不总是包括在内),并且在大量未选择的人群中临床实施之前需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Cardiology Reports
Current Cardiology Reports CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to provide timely perspectives from experts on current advances in cardiovascular medicine. We also seek to provide reviews that highlight the most important recently published papers selected from the wealth of available cardiovascular literature. We accomplish this aim by appointing key authorities in major subject areas across the discipline. Section editors select topics to be reviewed by leading experts who emphasize recent developments and highlight important papers published over the past year. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信