Incidence, Severity, and Pain Self-Efficacy of Low Back Pain in the Female Healthcare Professionals and Their Impact on Overall Quality of Life: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-25 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.1042
Jun Ma, Hong Chen, Jin Ma, Ling Fan, Juan Liang, Jing Tan, Yang Yan, Longfang Huang, Huiping Yang, Lishi Yin
{"title":"Incidence, Severity, and Pain Self-Efficacy of Low Back Pain in the Female Healthcare Professionals and Their Impact on Overall Quality of Life: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.","authors":"Jun Ma, Hong Chen, Jin Ma, Ling Fan, Juan Liang, Jing Tan, Yang Yan, Longfang Huang, Huiping Yang, Lishi Yin","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.1042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Female healthcare professionals are prone to experiencing high rates of non-specific low back pain (LBP), significantly impacting their performance and overall well-being. This multi-center, retrospective study aims to investigate the frequency and severity of non-specific LBP among female healthcare professionals. Additionally, it seeks to assess the relationship among patients' physical condition, self-belief attributes, and quality of life, providing a comprehensive understanding of this crucial occupational health concern. <b>Methods</b> After propensity score matching (PSM), 1200 female clinical nurses (Study Group 1) and 1200 female doctors (Study Group 2) employed at 6 grade-A tertiary hospitals in Chongqing between November 2021 and January 2024 were included in the study. Additionally, 1200 healthy female volunteers who underwent routine physical examinations during the same period were enrolled as the Control Group. The study assessed the relationship between the incidence of LBP and various factors, such as sociodemographic characteristics, pain intensity, LBP-related disability, pain self-efficacy, and overall quality of life. By comparing these factors, the research sought to investigate their impact on the overall well-being of the subjects. <b>Results</b> Significant variations were observed in the prevalence of LBP across the three groups, with Study Group 1 and Study Group 2 exhibiting higher rates than the Control Group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Notable differences were found in the mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and pain self-efficacy questionnaire (psEQ) scores among the three groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with Study Group 1 and Study Group 2 recording higher mean scores than the Control Group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, there were significant differences in the mean subjective symptoms, clinical signs, limitations in daily activities, and total Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) LBP scores among the three groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with Study Group 1 and Study Group 2 yielding lower mean scores than the Control Group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences were observed in the mean social function, emotional role, mental health, and total 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores among the three groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with Study Group 1 and Study Group 2 showing lower mean scores than the Control Group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The total JOA LBP scores and total psEQ scores showed positive correlations with the total SF-36 scores in the individual groups and the overall study cohort, while the VAS scores were negatively correlated with the total SF-36 scores (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b> LBP occurs more frequently among female healthcare professionals than the general female population. Moreover, they experience more severe pain, greater functional limitations, and a more pronounced decrease in their quality of life. Despite these challenges, the unique occupational demands result in a higher pain self-efficacy among female medical care workers, which could help alleviate the negative impact of LBP on their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 6","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.1042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background Female healthcare professionals are prone to experiencing high rates of non-specific low back pain (LBP), significantly impacting their performance and overall well-being. This multi-center, retrospective study aims to investigate the frequency and severity of non-specific LBP among female healthcare professionals. Additionally, it seeks to assess the relationship among patients' physical condition, self-belief attributes, and quality of life, providing a comprehensive understanding of this crucial occupational health concern. Methods After propensity score matching (PSM), 1200 female clinical nurses (Study Group 1) and 1200 female doctors (Study Group 2) employed at 6 grade-A tertiary hospitals in Chongqing between November 2021 and January 2024 were included in the study. Additionally, 1200 healthy female volunteers who underwent routine physical examinations during the same period were enrolled as the Control Group. The study assessed the relationship between the incidence of LBP and various factors, such as sociodemographic characteristics, pain intensity, LBP-related disability, pain self-efficacy, and overall quality of life. By comparing these factors, the research sought to investigate their impact on the overall well-being of the subjects. Results Significant variations were observed in the prevalence of LBP across the three groups, with Study Group 1 and Study Group 2 exhibiting higher rates than the Control Group (p < 0.001). Notable differences were found in the mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and pain self-efficacy questionnaire (psEQ) scores among the three groups (p < 0.001), with Study Group 1 and Study Group 2 recording higher mean scores than the Control Group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were significant differences in the mean subjective symptoms, clinical signs, limitations in daily activities, and total Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) LBP scores among the three groups (p < 0.001), with Study Group 1 and Study Group 2 yielding lower mean scores than the Control Group (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences were observed in the mean social function, emotional role, mental health, and total 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores among the three groups (p < 0.001), with Study Group 1 and Study Group 2 showing lower mean scores than the Control Group (p < 0.001). The total JOA LBP scores and total psEQ scores showed positive correlations with the total SF-36 scores in the individual groups and the overall study cohort, while the VAS scores were negatively correlated with the total SF-36 scores (p < 0.001). Conclusion LBP occurs more frequently among female healthcare professionals than the general female population. Moreover, they experience more severe pain, greater functional limitations, and a more pronounced decrease in their quality of life. Despite these challenges, the unique occupational demands result in a higher pain self-efficacy among female medical care workers, which could help alleviate the negative impact of LBP on their quality of life.

女性医护人员腰痛的发生率、严重程度和疼痛自我效能感及其对整体生活质量的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究
目的/背景女性医疗保健专业人员容易经历高比例的非特异性腰痛(LBP),这严重影响了她们的工作表现和整体幸福感。本多中心回顾性研究旨在调查女性医疗保健专业人员非特异性腰痛的频率和严重程度。此外,它还试图评估患者的身体状况、自信属性和生活质量之间的关系,从而全面了解这一重要的职业健康问题。方法采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)方法,选取2021年11月至2024年1月在重庆市6家三级甲等医院工作的1200名女临床护士(研究组1)和1200名女医生(研究组2)。此外,在同一时期接受常规体检的1200名健康女性志愿者被纳入对照组。该研究评估了腰痛发生率与各种因素之间的关系,如社会人口学特征、疼痛强度、腰痛相关残疾、疼痛自我效能感和整体生活质量。通过比较这些因素,该研究试图调查它们对受试者整体幸福感的影响。结果三组患者腰痛患病率存在显著差异,研究1组和研究2组的发生率高于对照组(p < 0.001)。三组患者视觉模拟量表(VAS)和疼痛自我效能问卷(psEQ)平均得分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001),其中研究组1和研究组2的平均得分高于对照组(p < 0.001)。此外,三组患者的平均主观症状、临床体征、日常活动受限和日本骨科协会(JOA) LBP总分均存在显著差异(p < 0.001),研究1组和研究2组的平均得分低于对照组(p < 0.001)。此外,三组在平均社会功能、情感角色、心理健康和总36项简短健康调查(SF-36)得分方面存在显著差异(p < 0.001),研究1组和研究2组的平均得分低于对照组(p < 0.001)。JOA LBP总分和psEQ总分与各组和整个研究队列的SF-36总分呈正相关,VAS评分与SF-36总分呈负相关(p < 0.001)。结论女性医务人员腰痛发生率高于普通女性人群。此外,他们还会经历更严重的疼痛、更大的功能限制和更明显的生活质量下降。尽管存在这些挑战,但女性医护人员独特的职业需求导致其疼痛自我效能感较高,有助于缓解腰痛对其生活质量的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信