Tim T Bui, Alexander T Yahanda, Karan Joseph, Miguel Ruiz-Cardozo, Bernardo A de Monaco, Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja, Joshua P Koleske, Sean D McEvoy, Camilo A Molina
{"title":"Using Patient-Specific 3D-Printed C1-C2 Interfacet Spacers for the Treatment of Type 1 Basilar Invagination: A Clinical Case Report.","authors":"Tim T Bui, Alexander T Yahanda, Karan Joseph, Miguel Ruiz-Cardozo, Bernardo A de Monaco, Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja, Joshua P Koleske, Sean D McEvoy, Camilo A Molina","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics10060408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Type 1 basilar invagination (BI) is caused by a structural instability at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) and has been historically treated with distraction and stabilization through fusion of the C1-C2 vertebrae. Recent advances in 3D printed custom implants (3DPIs) have improved the array of available options for reaching distraction and alignment goals. <b>Case Presentation:</b> We report the case of a 15-year-old male who presented with early signs of cervical myelopathy. Radiographic evaluation revealed type 1 BI with a widened atlantodental interval (ADI) of 3.7 mm and a 9 mm McRae's line violation (MLV) of the dens, resulting in severe narrowing at the CVJ and brainstem/spinal cord impingement. Of note, the patient had bilateral dysplastic C1 and C2 anatomy, thus requiring a patient-specific 3DPI to conform to this anatomy and enable sufficient distraction and fusion. Custom 3D printed C1-C2 interfacet spacers were created and implemented within 14 days to achieve sufficient distraction, osteoconduction, and stabilization of the C1-C2 joint. <b>Outcome:</b> Postoperatively, the patient remained neurologically intact with myelopathic symptom improvement before discharge on postoperative day 4. Postoperative imaging demonstrated the resolution of BI from successful C1-C2 joint distraction and confirmed intended implant placement with resolution of canal stenosis. During his 6-week follow-up, the patient remained neurologically stable with intact hardware and preserved alignment. <b>Conclusions:</b> This case is the first in the United States demonstrating the use of custom 3D printed interfacet spacers to achieve successful distraction, decompression, and stabilization of type 1 BI. These patient-specific 3DPIs were designed and created in a streamlined manner and serve as proof-of-concept of pragmatic implant design and manufacturing. Future optimization of the workflow and characterization of long-term patient outcomes should be explored for these types of 3DPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10060408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Type 1 basilar invagination (BI) is caused by a structural instability at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) and has been historically treated with distraction and stabilization through fusion of the C1-C2 vertebrae. Recent advances in 3D printed custom implants (3DPIs) have improved the array of available options for reaching distraction and alignment goals. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 15-year-old male who presented with early signs of cervical myelopathy. Radiographic evaluation revealed type 1 BI with a widened atlantodental interval (ADI) of 3.7 mm and a 9 mm McRae's line violation (MLV) of the dens, resulting in severe narrowing at the CVJ and brainstem/spinal cord impingement. Of note, the patient had bilateral dysplastic C1 and C2 anatomy, thus requiring a patient-specific 3DPI to conform to this anatomy and enable sufficient distraction and fusion. Custom 3D printed C1-C2 interfacet spacers were created and implemented within 14 days to achieve sufficient distraction, osteoconduction, and stabilization of the C1-C2 joint. Outcome: Postoperatively, the patient remained neurologically intact with myelopathic symptom improvement before discharge on postoperative day 4. Postoperative imaging demonstrated the resolution of BI from successful C1-C2 joint distraction and confirmed intended implant placement with resolution of canal stenosis. During his 6-week follow-up, the patient remained neurologically stable with intact hardware and preserved alignment. Conclusions: This case is the first in the United States demonstrating the use of custom 3D printed interfacet spacers to achieve successful distraction, decompression, and stabilization of type 1 BI. These patient-specific 3DPIs were designed and created in a streamlined manner and serve as proof-of-concept of pragmatic implant design and manufacturing. Future optimization of the workflow and characterization of long-term patient outcomes should be explored for these types of 3DPI.