Transition Processes in Technological Systems: Inspiration from Processes in Biological Evolution.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Martin Möller, Olga Speck, Harishankar Thekkepat, Thomas Speck
{"title":"Transition Processes in Technological Systems: Inspiration from Processes in Biological Evolution.","authors":"Martin Möller, Olga Speck, Harishankar Thekkepat, Thomas Speck","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics10060406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With environmental challenges intensifying, a fundamental understanding and sustainable management of ongoing transition processes are crucial. Biological evolution provides valuable lessons on how to adapt and thrive under changing conditions. By studying its key principles, we identified analogies between biological evolution and technological transitions in terms of both the Multi-Level Perceptive and the path dependency model. The comparative study also revealed that, despite contrasting time scales, the generation-based and version-based developments are comparable. In addition, interesting similarities were found in the increase and decrease of variety and between fitness and consistency. The lessons learned from biology include \"Give it a try\", \"Do not close for reconstruction\", and \"Keep older versions in the innovation process\". Based on this comparison, we aim to gain insights for a better understanding of how to manage technology transitions and to derive concrete indicators for assessing and monitoring them. In doing so, we can provide action-oriented guidance for developing more sustainable technological solutions for major ongoing transitions, such as the energy transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10060406","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With environmental challenges intensifying, a fundamental understanding and sustainable management of ongoing transition processes are crucial. Biological evolution provides valuable lessons on how to adapt and thrive under changing conditions. By studying its key principles, we identified analogies between biological evolution and technological transitions in terms of both the Multi-Level Perceptive and the path dependency model. The comparative study also revealed that, despite contrasting time scales, the generation-based and version-based developments are comparable. In addition, interesting similarities were found in the increase and decrease of variety and between fitness and consistency. The lessons learned from biology include "Give it a try", "Do not close for reconstruction", and "Keep older versions in the innovation process". Based on this comparison, we aim to gain insights for a better understanding of how to manage technology transitions and to derive concrete indicators for assessing and monitoring them. In doing so, we can provide action-oriented guidance for developing more sustainable technological solutions for major ongoing transitions, such as the energy transition.

技术系统的过渡过程:来自生物进化过程的启示。
随着环境挑战的加剧,对正在进行的过渡进程的基本理解和可持续管理至关重要。生物进化为如何在不断变化的条件下适应和茁壮成长提供了宝贵的经验。通过研究其关键原理,我们从多层次感知模型和路径依赖模型两方面确定了生物进化与技术转型之间的相似性。对比研究还显示,尽管时间尺度不同,但基于代的开发和基于版本的开发具有可比性。此外,品种的增加和减少以及适应度和一致性之间也存在有趣的相似性。从生物学中学到的教训包括“试一试”、“不要为了重建而关闭”和“在创新过程中保留旧版本”。基于这种比较,我们的目标是获得洞察力,以便更好地理解如何管理技术转型,并得出评估和监控技术转型的具体指标。通过这样做,我们可以提供面向行动的指导,为正在进行的重大转型(如能源转型)开发更可持续的技术解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomimetics
Biomimetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信