Cost analysis of urine testing for hospitalized patients in the emergency department.

Q3 Medicine
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2025.2479375
A Corey Yeates, Jennifer A Zimmerman, Christopher J Destache, David S Quimby
{"title":"Cost analysis of urine testing for hospitalized patients in the emergency department.","authors":"A Corey Yeates, Jennifer A Zimmerman, Christopher J Destache, David S Quimby","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2479375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are commonly diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). However, an accurate diagnosis requires an appropriate clinical presentation. The objective of this retrospective review of patients admitted to the hospital via the ED was to determine the extent of urinary testing for infection despite no appropriate medical criteria and the associated economic costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients admitted to an academic medical center via the ED in two 1-week periods were reviewed. The medical records were manually reviewed to determine whether the urine was tested for infection and whether this was medically necessary based on generally accepted clinical criteria. The economic cost of the unnecessary testing was determined based on direct laboratory processing costs, staffing costs associated with sample acquisition and processing, and antimicrobials prescribed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 401 admissions to the hospital via the ED in the two 1-week timeframes, and 212 (52.87%) had urinalyses on admission. Among them, 133 (62.74%) had no medical necessity for the testing. The total annual cost was extrapolated to a direct cost of $8,490.68 and a total cost of $49,701.01.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate the projected annual cost of inappropriate urine testing in patients admitted through the ED. Data such as these may be of value to hospital systems in the design or creation of order sets to focus on appropriate testing. These data would also be helpful for diagnostic stewardship programs to help rein in the ever-increasing cost of healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 4","pages":"449-452"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2479375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are commonly diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). However, an accurate diagnosis requires an appropriate clinical presentation. The objective of this retrospective review of patients admitted to the hospital via the ED was to determine the extent of urinary testing for infection despite no appropriate medical criteria and the associated economic costs.

Methods: Adult patients admitted to an academic medical center via the ED in two 1-week periods were reviewed. The medical records were manually reviewed to determine whether the urine was tested for infection and whether this was medically necessary based on generally accepted clinical criteria. The economic cost of the unnecessary testing was determined based on direct laboratory processing costs, staffing costs associated with sample acquisition and processing, and antimicrobials prescribed.

Results: There were 401 admissions to the hospital via the ED in the two 1-week timeframes, and 212 (52.87%) had urinalyses on admission. Among them, 133 (62.74%) had no medical necessity for the testing. The total annual cost was extrapolated to a direct cost of $8,490.68 and a total cost of $49,701.01.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate the projected annual cost of inappropriate urine testing in patients admitted through the ED. Data such as these may be of value to hospital systems in the design or creation of order sets to focus on appropriate testing. These data would also be helpful for diagnostic stewardship programs to help rein in the ever-increasing cost of healthcare.

急诊科住院患者尿检成本分析
导读:尿路感染(uti)通常在急诊科(ED)诊断。然而,准确的诊断需要适当的临床表现。本研究对通过急诊科入院的患者进行回顾性分析,目的是在没有适当的医学标准和相关经济成本的情况下,确定尿检感染的程度。方法:对两周内经急诊科进入某学术医疗中心的成年患者进行回顾性分析。人工审查了医疗记录,以确定是否对尿液进行了感染检测,以及根据普遍接受的临床标准,这在医学上是否必要。不必要检测的经济成本是根据直接实验室处理成本、与样品采集和处理相关的人员成本以及规定的抗菌素来确定的。结果:2周内急诊科入院401例,入院时尿检212例(52.87%)。其中133人(62.74%)没有医学需要进行检测。年总费用外推为直接费用8 4900.68美元,总费用49 701.01美元。结论:这些结果表明,在急诊科入院的患者中,不适当的尿液检测的预计年度成本。这些数据可能对医院系统在设计或创建订单集时具有价值,以专注于适当的检测。这些数据也将有助于诊断管理计划,以帮助控制不断增长的医疗保健成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信