A single-institution retrospective analysis on the administration of β-lactam antibiotics prior to vancomycin in bacteremic patients.

Q3 Medicine
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2025.2494488
John Corbyn Cravero, Collin Telchik, Taylor Yakubik, Lewis Woods, Sharon Park, Lauren Sisco
{"title":"A single-institution retrospective analysis on the administration of β-lactam antibiotics prior to vancomycin in bacteremic patients.","authors":"John Corbyn Cravero, Collin Telchik, Taylor Yakubik, Lewis Woods, Sharon Park, Lauren Sisco","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2494488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines emphasize prompt antibiotic administration as a recommendation for septic patients. Instead of focusing solely on timing, we aimed to investigate whether the sequence of antibiotic administration influences mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-institution retrospective study included patients over 18 years old with confirmed bacteremia between January 1, 2021, and July 1, 2023, who received sequential antibiotic administration of intravenous β-lactam and vancomycin within the first 6 hours of admission. Our primary objective was to determine the odds ratio for 30-day mortality based upon antibiotic class administered first.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6143 patients generated from an electronic search, 222 patients were included in the β-lactam-first group, and 16 were included in the vancomycin-first group. The most common β-lactam antibiotic administered was piperacillin-tazobactam (58.40%) followed by cefepime (25.47%) and then ceftriaxone (13.03%). For patients with monomicrobial bacteremia, the most common bacterial infections included <i>Escherichia coli</i> (25.21%), methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (13.45%), methicillin-susceptible <i>S. aureus</i> (11.34%), and <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> (7.56%). The calculated odds ratio for 30-day mortality was 0.40 (95% confidence interval 0.089-1.831), indicating a decreased occurrence of mortality within 30 days for patients who received β-lactam antibiotics first, although this result was not statistically significant due to limited sample size, particularly within the vancomycin-first group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although not statistically significant, the prompt administration of β-lactam antibiotics before vancomycin may confer a mortality benefit in patients with bacteremia. Further studies are needed to validate this finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 4","pages":"421-426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2494488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines emphasize prompt antibiotic administration as a recommendation for septic patients. Instead of focusing solely on timing, we aimed to investigate whether the sequence of antibiotic administration influences mortality.

Methods: This single-institution retrospective study included patients over 18 years old with confirmed bacteremia between January 1, 2021, and July 1, 2023, who received sequential antibiotic administration of intravenous β-lactam and vancomycin within the first 6 hours of admission. Our primary objective was to determine the odds ratio for 30-day mortality based upon antibiotic class administered first.

Results: Of 6143 patients generated from an electronic search, 222 patients were included in the β-lactam-first group, and 16 were included in the vancomycin-first group. The most common β-lactam antibiotic administered was piperacillin-tazobactam (58.40%) followed by cefepime (25.47%) and then ceftriaxone (13.03%). For patients with monomicrobial bacteremia, the most common bacterial infections included Escherichia coli (25.21%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (13.45%), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (11.34%), and Proteus mirabilis (7.56%). The calculated odds ratio for 30-day mortality was 0.40 (95% confidence interval 0.089-1.831), indicating a decreased occurrence of mortality within 30 days for patients who received β-lactam antibiotics first, although this result was not statistically significant due to limited sample size, particularly within the vancomycin-first group.

Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, the prompt administration of β-lactam antibiotics before vancomycin may confer a mortality benefit in patients with bacteremia. Further studies are needed to validate this finding.

单机构回顾性分析β-内酰胺类抗生素先于万古霉素在细菌性贫血患者中的应用。
背景:《2021年脓毒症生存指南》强调建议脓毒症患者及时使用抗生素。而不是仅仅关注时间,我们的目的是调查抗生素给药顺序是否影响死亡率。方法:这项单机构回顾性研究纳入了2021年1月1日至2023年7月1日期间确诊菌血症的18岁以上患者,这些患者在入院前6小时内接受了β-内酰胺和万古霉素的序贯抗生素静脉注射。我们的主要目的是确定基于首先使用的抗生素种类的30天死亡率的优势比。结果:在电子检索产生的6143例患者中,β-内酰胺优先组222例,万古霉素优先组16例。最常用的β-内酰胺类抗生素是哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(58.40%),其次是头孢吡肟(25.47%)和头孢曲松(13.03%)。在单菌菌血症患者中,最常见的细菌感染包括大肠杆菌(25.21%)、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(13.45%)、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(11.34%)和奇异变形杆菌(7.56%)。计算出的30天死亡率优势比为0.40(95%可信区间为0.089-1.831),表明先使用β-内酰胺类抗生素的患者30天内死亡率降低,尽管由于样本量有限,特别是在先使用万古霉素组,这一结果没有统计学意义。结论:虽然没有统计学意义,但在万古霉素之前及时使用β-内酰胺类抗生素可能会降低菌血症患者的死亡率。需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信