A Just Transition or a Downward Spiral? Land and Livelihood Transitions to and Away From Coal Mining in India

IF 2.9 2区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Patrik Oskarsson, Suravee Nayak, Nikas Kindo
{"title":"A Just Transition or a Downward Spiral? Land and Livelihood Transitions to and Away From Coal Mining in India","authors":"Patrik Oskarsson,&nbsp;Suravee Nayak,&nbsp;Nikas Kindo","doi":"10.1111/joac.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When coal mines expand across Central and Eastern India, agrarian groups typically object strongly to displacement. Meanwhile, and often in the immediate vicinity of the expanding mines, the previously displaced now working in the coal economy protest against mine closures. Additional millions are situated somewhere between attempts to protect agrarian livelihoods and keeping a coal job as their lives become increasingly conflated with, and dependent on, coal. In this article, we draw on long-term and recent engagements across two coal-producing states in India to reflect on difficult livelihood transitions to and away from coal mining among indigenous and caste Hindu groups. We focus on the enduring value of land for which there is no good substitute as means of social reproduction. When a mine inevitably closes, lacking skills and land holdings generate a downward spiral in enforced livelihood transitions towards insecure informality. This creates enduring tensions in the concept of ‘just transitions’ when applied to the Indian coal sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agrarian Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.70003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When coal mines expand across Central and Eastern India, agrarian groups typically object strongly to displacement. Meanwhile, and often in the immediate vicinity of the expanding mines, the previously displaced now working in the coal economy protest against mine closures. Additional millions are situated somewhere between attempts to protect agrarian livelihoods and keeping a coal job as their lives become increasingly conflated with, and dependent on, coal. In this article, we draw on long-term and recent engagements across two coal-producing states in India to reflect on difficult livelihood transitions to and away from coal mining among indigenous and caste Hindu groups. We focus on the enduring value of land for which there is no good substitute as means of social reproduction. When a mine inevitably closes, lacking skills and land holdings generate a downward spiral in enforced livelihood transitions towards insecure informality. This creates enduring tensions in the concept of ‘just transitions’ when applied to the Indian coal sector.

公正的过渡还是恶性循环?印度土地和生计向煤炭开采和远离煤炭开采的转变
当煤矿在印度中部和东部扩张时,农业团体通常强烈反对迁移。与此同时,通常在煤矿扩张的邻近地区,以前流离失所的人现在在煤炭经济中工作,抗议煤矿关闭。另外还有数百万人处于保护农业生计和维持煤炭工作之间,因为他们的生活越来越与煤炭联系在一起,并越来越依赖煤炭。在本文中,我们借鉴了印度两个产煤邦的长期和最近的合作,以反思土著和种姓印度教群体向煤炭开采和远离煤炭开采的艰难生计转型。我们关注的是土地的持久价值,作为社会再生产的手段,没有好的替代品。当矿山不可避免地关闭时,缺乏技能和土地所有权会导致被迫向不安全的非正式生计过渡的恶性循环。这在“公正转型”的概念应用于印度煤炭行业时造成了持久的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agrarian Change is a journal of agrarian political economy. It promotes investigation of the social relations and dynamics of production, property and power in agrarian formations and their processes of change, both historical and contemporary. It encourages work within a broad interdisciplinary framework, informed by theory, and serves as a forum for serious comparative analysis and scholarly debate. Contributions are welcomed from political economists, historians, anthropologists, sociologists, political scientists, economists, geographers, lawyers, and others committed to the rigorous study and analysis of agrarian structure and change, past and present, in different parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信