Degree of Compliance of Hospital Emergency Departments With the Recommended Standards and Their Evolution During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Cristina Font-Cabrera, Jordi Adamuz, Maria Eulàlia Juvé-Udina, Miquel Sánchez, Almudena Mateos-Dávila, José Antonio Sarria-Guerrero, Andrea Pastor-Puigdomènech, Eva Maria Guix-Comellas
{"title":"Degree of Compliance of Hospital Emergency Departments With the Recommended Standards and Their Evolution During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic","authors":"Cristina Font-Cabrera,&nbsp;Jordi Adamuz,&nbsp;Maria Eulàlia Juvé-Udina,&nbsp;Miquel Sánchez,&nbsp;Almudena Mateos-Dávila,&nbsp;José Antonio Sarria-Guerrero,&nbsp;Andrea Pastor-Puigdomènech,&nbsp;Eva Maria Guix-Comellas","doi":"10.1155/jonm/4228788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> To analyse the degree of compliance of the care times of hospital emergency departments (EDs) in Spain with the recommended standards and their evolution during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</p>\n <p><b>Design and Methods:</b> An observational, correlational, cross-sectional and retrospective study was carried out. All adult patients attended in the EDs of 8 Spanish public hospitals from 2018 to 2021 were consecutively included. The main variables were time spent in the ED, time to triage, waiting time until the start of care, triage level, classified according to the Spanish Triage System and year of care. Other sociodemographic variables were collected, in addition to discharge destination. For each triage level, a negative binomial regression model was performed, adjusted for year, hospital and waiting times. The analysis was performed with <i>R</i> 4.2.2 software.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 2,282,555 patients were included; ED lengths of stay varied according to triage levels: Level 1, 21.6 h; Level 2, 26.3 h; Level 3, 22.2 h; Level 4, 8.1 h and Level 5, 10.3 h. Statistically significant differences were detected only in 2021, in all hospitals and from priority Level 2–5. An increase in dwell times was observed in all hospitals, with longer dwell times in high complexity hospitals. Longer waiting times at triage Levels 3, 4 and 5 presented a higher risk of mortality. The percentage of patients leaving the ED was high (3.6%).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The degree of compliance with ED care times according to recommended standards was low. The dropout rate, waiting times for initial triage and ED attendance were higher than desired. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic changed the pattern of ED visits, decreasing the frequentation of patients, but did not decrease the length of stay in the ED. This pattern normalised the following year.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/4228788","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/4228788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To analyse the degree of compliance of the care times of hospital emergency departments (EDs) in Spain with the recommended standards and their evolution during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Design and Methods: An observational, correlational, cross-sectional and retrospective study was carried out. All adult patients attended in the EDs of 8 Spanish public hospitals from 2018 to 2021 were consecutively included. The main variables were time spent in the ED, time to triage, waiting time until the start of care, triage level, classified according to the Spanish Triage System and year of care. Other sociodemographic variables were collected, in addition to discharge destination. For each triage level, a negative binomial regression model was performed, adjusted for year, hospital and waiting times. The analysis was performed with R 4.2.2 software.

Results: A total of 2,282,555 patients were included; ED lengths of stay varied according to triage levels: Level 1, 21.6 h; Level 2, 26.3 h; Level 3, 22.2 h; Level 4, 8.1 h and Level 5, 10.3 h. Statistically significant differences were detected only in 2021, in all hospitals and from priority Level 2–5. An increase in dwell times was observed in all hospitals, with longer dwell times in high complexity hospitals. Longer waiting times at triage Levels 3, 4 and 5 presented a higher risk of mortality. The percentage of patients leaving the ED was high (3.6%).

Conclusions: The degree of compliance with ED care times according to recommended standards was low. The dropout rate, waiting times for initial triage and ED attendance were higher than desired. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic changed the pattern of ED visits, decreasing the frequentation of patients, but did not decrease the length of stay in the ED. This pattern normalised the following year.

Abstract Image

SARS-CoV-2大流行期间医院急诊科对推荐标准的遵守程度及其演变
目的:分析西班牙SARS-CoV-2大流行期间医院急诊科护理时间对推荐标准的遵守程度及其演变情况。设计与方法:采用观察性、相关性、横断面和回顾性研究。连续纳入2018 - 2021年在西班牙8家公立医院急诊科就诊的所有成年患者。主要变量是在急诊科花费的时间、分诊时间、等待开始治疗的时间、分诊级别、根据西班牙分诊系统分类和护理年份。除出院目的地外,还收集了其他社会人口学变量。对于每个分类级别,执行负二项回归模型,并根据年份,医院和等待时间进行调整。采用r4.2.2软件进行分析。结果:共纳入2,282,555例患者;急诊停留时间根据分诊级别不同而不同:1级,21.6小时;二级:26.3小时;3级,22.2小时;4级8.1小时,5级10.3小时。仅在2021年,在所有医院和优先级2-5级之间发现了统计学上的显著差异。所有医院的住院时间都有所增加,在高度复杂的医院,住院时间更长。三级、四级和五级的等待时间较长,死亡风险较高。患者离开急诊科的比例很高(3.6%)。结论:急诊科护理时间按照推荐标准的依从度较低。辍学率、初次分诊的等待时间和急诊科的出勤率都高于预期。SARS-CoV-2大流行改变了急诊科的就诊模式,减少了患者的就诊频率,但没有减少急诊科的住院时间。这种模式在第二年正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信