Rural Land Markets and Accumulation in an Agrarian Periphery: A Class-Relational Approach to Rentierism in India

IF 2.9 2区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Mihika Chatterjee
{"title":"Rural Land Markets and Accumulation in an Agrarian Periphery: A Class-Relational Approach to Rentierism in India","authors":"Mihika Chatterjee","doi":"10.1111/joac.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Land markets are an increasingly significant byproduct of industrialisation in neoliberal India, but accumulation possibilities for rural classes through speculation are uneven. Trajectories through rents are determined not just by the social relations in impacted villages but crucially by the historically determined dynamics of the wider regional economy. This article examines the patterns of differentiation following two decades of land dispossession for industrial infrastructure development in a peripheralised region of western India. The combination of production and circulation through land markets here enables accumulation that is petty (in size) and ‘provincial’ (in terms of linkages and spatial expanse) for surplus-generating capitalist farmers. Overall patterns of accumulation through rents show a fettering of agrarian capital within the rural, the explanation for which lies in the specificities of capitalist development of the wider region, which constrain expanded reproduction through urban sites. Dispossession for manufacturing hubs and the more dispersed industrial infrastructure in the neoliberal era not only increases rural inequalities but does little to ameliorate regional disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agrarian Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.70001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land markets are an increasingly significant byproduct of industrialisation in neoliberal India, but accumulation possibilities for rural classes through speculation are uneven. Trajectories through rents are determined not just by the social relations in impacted villages but crucially by the historically determined dynamics of the wider regional economy. This article examines the patterns of differentiation following two decades of land dispossession for industrial infrastructure development in a peripheralised region of western India. The combination of production and circulation through land markets here enables accumulation that is petty (in size) and ‘provincial’ (in terms of linkages and spatial expanse) for surplus-generating capitalist farmers. Overall patterns of accumulation through rents show a fettering of agrarian capital within the rural, the explanation for which lies in the specificities of capitalist development of the wider region, which constrain expanded reproduction through urban sites. Dispossession for manufacturing hubs and the more dispersed industrial infrastructure in the neoliberal era not only increases rural inequalities but does little to ameliorate regional disparities.

Abstract Image

农业边缘地区的农村土地市场与积累:印度食利者主义的阶级关系研究
在新自由主义的印度,土地市场是工业化日益重要的副产品,但农村阶级通过投机积累土地的可能性是不均衡的。租金的轨迹不仅由受影响村庄的社会关系决定,更重要的是由历史决定的更广泛的区域经济动态决定。本文考察了印度西部外围地区工业基础设施发展的土地剥夺二十年后的分化模式。通过土地市场的生产和流通结合在一起,使得资本主义农民的积累是小规模的(在规模上)和“地方性的”(在联系和空间扩张方面)。通过租金积累的总体模式显示了农业资本在农村的束缚,其解释在于更广泛地区资本主义发展的特殊性,这限制了通过城市场地扩大再生产。在新自由主义时代,对制造业中心和更分散的工业基础设施的剥夺不仅增加了农村的不平等,而且对改善地区差距几乎没有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agrarian Change is a journal of agrarian political economy. It promotes investigation of the social relations and dynamics of production, property and power in agrarian formations and their processes of change, both historical and contemporary. It encourages work within a broad interdisciplinary framework, informed by theory, and serves as a forum for serious comparative analysis and scholarly debate. Contributions are welcomed from political economists, historians, anthropologists, sociologists, political scientists, economists, geographers, lawyers, and others committed to the rigorous study and analysis of agrarian structure and change, past and present, in different parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信