Emerging investigator series: are we undervaluing septage? Rethinking septage management for nutrient recovery and environmental protection

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Kevin D. Orner, Lewis S. Rowles, Sara Heger and Ben Howard
{"title":"Emerging investigator series: are we undervaluing septage? Rethinking septage management for nutrient recovery and environmental protection","authors":"Kevin D. Orner, Lewis S. Rowles, Sara Heger and Ben Howard","doi":"10.1039/D4EW00998C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >An estimated 20–25% percent of households in the US rely on on-site sanitation <em>via</em> septic tanks to manage their wastewater. Septage management strategies such as land application, treatment at wastewater treatment plants, and treatment at independent septage treatment plants are common regulated and protective processes for managing septage. There can, however, be potentially negative environmental impacts such as groundwater contamination if septic systems are failing or improperly designed. In this perspective, we reimagine septage management at each step of the septage value chain, identify barriers to change, and propose solutions to overcome these existing barriers. Reimagined septage management can take both high-level and context-specific approaches, including upgrading or retrofitting older septic takes to be impermeable and promoting proper tank pumping intervals, short transport distances, resource recovery, and safe reuse. These solutions could improve economic, environmental, and social sustainability over the status quo. Barriers such as lack of comprehensive data, aspects of decentralized regulation and management, public perception, and impacts of climate change can be overcome <em>via</em> policy best practices, increased stakeholder engagement, improved data collection, integration of machine learning, and climate change adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 7","pages":" 1621-1628"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/ew/d4ew00998c?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ew/d4ew00998c","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An estimated 20–25% percent of households in the US rely on on-site sanitation via septic tanks to manage their wastewater. Septage management strategies such as land application, treatment at wastewater treatment plants, and treatment at independent septage treatment plants are common regulated and protective processes for managing septage. There can, however, be potentially negative environmental impacts such as groundwater contamination if septic systems are failing or improperly designed. In this perspective, we reimagine septage management at each step of the septage value chain, identify barriers to change, and propose solutions to overcome these existing barriers. Reimagined septage management can take both high-level and context-specific approaches, including upgrading or retrofitting older septic takes to be impermeable and promoting proper tank pumping intervals, short transport distances, resource recovery, and safe reuse. These solutions could improve economic, environmental, and social sustainability over the status quo. Barriers such as lack of comprehensive data, aspects of decentralized regulation and management, public perception, and impacts of climate change can be overcome via policy best practices, increased stakeholder engagement, improved data collection, integration of machine learning, and climate change adaptation.

Abstract Image

新兴研究者系列:我们是否低估了隔膜?重新思考污水管理对养分回收和环境保护的影响
据估计,美国有20%到25%的家庭依靠化粪池的现场卫生设施来处理废水。污水管理策略,如土地申请、污水处理厂处理和独立污水处理厂处理,是管理污水的常见规范和保护程序。然而,如果化粪池系统失效或设计不当,可能会对环境产生潜在的负面影响,例如地下水污染。从这个角度来看,我们在隔膜价值链的每一步重新设想隔膜管理,确定变革的障碍,并提出克服这些现有障碍的解决方案。重新设想的污水管理可以采用高层次和特定环境的方法,包括升级或改造旧的化粪池,使其不透水,促进适当的抽水间隔,缩短运输距离,资源回收和安全再利用。这些解决方案可以改善经济、环境和社会的可持续性。缺乏全面的数据、分散监管和管理的各个方面、公众认知以及气候变化的影响等障碍可以通过政策最佳实践、加强利益相关者参与、改进数据收集、整合机器学习和适应气候变化来克服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信