Access Inequality in LEO Satellite Networks: A Case Study of High-Latitude Coverage in Northern Québec

IF 5.3 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Mohammed Almekhlafi;Antoine Lesage-Landry;Gunes Karabulut Kurt
{"title":"Access Inequality in LEO Satellite Networks: A Case Study of High-Latitude Coverage in Northern Québec","authors":"Mohammed Almekhlafi;Antoine Lesage-Landry;Gunes Karabulut Kurt","doi":"10.1109/OJVT.2025.3575546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks play a crucial role in bridging the digital divide, particularly in remote and high-latitude regions. However, access inequality remains a significant challenge, limiting broadband connectivity for communities in northern areas compared to mid-latitude urban regions. This study reviews recent advancements in non-terrestrial networks (NTNs). We conduct a detailed analysis of coverage disparities in LEO satellite networks considering LEO networks, namely Starlink, Telesat-like, Kuiper-like, and OneWeb, with a specific focus on Québec, Canada versus urban centers in New York City, USA. Our findings highlight a significant disparity in the number of visible satellites resulting in increased transmission delays and reduced network reliability in high-latitude regions. Additionally, we observe that higher elevation angles, more accessible in mid-latitude regions especially for Starlink and Kuiper, contribute to superior signal quality and transmission rates. To mitigate this gap, we propose an inter-constellation/orbit roaming mechanism that enables ground users to be served by different LEO constellations—leveraging OneWeb's and Telesat's strong polar coverage along with the high satellite density of Starlink and Kuiper at mid-latitudes. Jointly, terrestrial network (TN) expansion can enhance signal quality and transmission efficiency, particularly in underserved areas where NTNs act as edge computing and backhaul infrastructures. Additionally, the associated challenges—such as roaming handovers, and radio resource and network slicing management are discussed in detail, where designing a unified management and control entity to ensure seamless interoperability is not a trivial task. Furthermore, we envision wireless power transfer through either relay-based (ground-to-satellite-to-ground) or direct (satellite-to-ground) power beaming as a sustainable approach to energize TN components in remote regions. These strategies collectively support the scalability and resilience of NTNs in bridging the global access inequality.","PeriodicalId":34270,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1613-1630"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11021288","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11021288/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks play a crucial role in bridging the digital divide, particularly in remote and high-latitude regions. However, access inequality remains a significant challenge, limiting broadband connectivity for communities in northern areas compared to mid-latitude urban regions. This study reviews recent advancements in non-terrestrial networks (NTNs). We conduct a detailed analysis of coverage disparities in LEO satellite networks considering LEO networks, namely Starlink, Telesat-like, Kuiper-like, and OneWeb, with a specific focus on Québec, Canada versus urban centers in New York City, USA. Our findings highlight a significant disparity in the number of visible satellites resulting in increased transmission delays and reduced network reliability in high-latitude regions. Additionally, we observe that higher elevation angles, more accessible in mid-latitude regions especially for Starlink and Kuiper, contribute to superior signal quality and transmission rates. To mitigate this gap, we propose an inter-constellation/orbit roaming mechanism that enables ground users to be served by different LEO constellations—leveraging OneWeb's and Telesat's strong polar coverage along with the high satellite density of Starlink and Kuiper at mid-latitudes. Jointly, terrestrial network (TN) expansion can enhance signal quality and transmission efficiency, particularly in underserved areas where NTNs act as edge computing and backhaul infrastructures. Additionally, the associated challenges—such as roaming handovers, and radio resource and network slicing management are discussed in detail, where designing a unified management and control entity to ensure seamless interoperability is not a trivial task. Furthermore, we envision wireless power transfer through either relay-based (ground-to-satellite-to-ground) or direct (satellite-to-ground) power beaming as a sustainable approach to energize TN components in remote regions. These strategies collectively support the scalability and resilience of NTNs in bridging the global access inequality.
低轨道卫星网络接入不平等:以青海北部高纬度覆盖为例
近地轨道卫星网络在弥合数字鸿沟方面发挥着至关重要的作用,特别是在偏远和高纬度地区。然而,与中纬度城市地区相比,接入不平等仍然是一个重大挑战,限制了北部地区社区的宽带连接。本研究综述了非地面网络(NTNs)的最新进展。我们详细分析了近地轨道卫星网络(即Starlink、Telesat-like、Kuiper-like和OneWeb)的覆盖差异,并特别关注加拿大的quacimbec与美国纽约市的城市中心。我们的研究结果突出了可见卫星数量的显著差异,导致高纬度地区传输延迟增加和网络可靠性降低。此外,我们观察到更高的仰角,特别是在中纬度地区更容易获得星链和柯伊伯,有助于提高信号质量和传输速率。为了弥补这一差距,我们提出了一种星座间/轨道漫游机制,利用OneWeb和Telesat强大的极地覆盖以及中纬度地区Starlink和Kuiper的高卫星密度,使地面用户能够通过不同的LEO星座获得服务。联合起来,地面网络(TN)扩展可以提高信号质量和传输效率,特别是在服务不足的地区,ntn充当边缘计算和回程基础设施。此外,还详细讨论了漫游切换、无线电资源和网络切片管理等相关挑战,其中设计统一的管理和控制实体以确保无缝互操作性并不是一项简单的任务。此外,我们设想通过基于中继的无线电力传输(地对地)或直接(卫星对地)电力传输作为一种可持续的方法,为偏远地区的TN组件供电。这些战略共同支持NTNs在弥合全球获取不平等方面的可扩展性和弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信