Why do users trust Robotaxi? Analyzing user differences and adoption behavior from a socio-technical perspective

IF 13.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Yuan Xiong Liu , HanXi Li , Younghwan Pan
{"title":"Why do users trust Robotaxi? Analyzing user differences and adoption behavior from a socio-technical perspective","authors":"Yuan Xiong Liu ,&nbsp;HanXi Li ,&nbsp;Younghwan Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of autonomous driving technology has propelled the emergence of Robotaxi services as a transformative innovation in urban mobility. However, despite technological advances, research on the mechanisms driving user trust and adoption of Robotaxi services remains limited. This study constructs and validates a socio-technical dual-dimensional framework to systematically investigate how social factors (e.g., social influence, policies, and the bandwagon effect) and technological factors (e.g., reliability, assurance, and empathy) jointly influence user trust and adoption decisions. Using structural equation modeling, data were collected through offline surveys from 564 Robotaxi users in operational Robotaxi services in Wuhan, China. The results confirm that trust serves as a key mediator, linking external social and technological factors to user behavior and highlight the strong influence of the bandwagon effect, reliability, and assurance on trust formation. Multi-group analysis reveals significant differences in trust formation across demographics, with women being more sensitive to empathy, men prioritizing responsiveness, and high-income users relying more on regulatory assurance. The findings provide theoretical contributions by expanding the trust mechanism in autonomous mobility services and offer practical implications for Robotaxi operators and policymakers, emphasizing personalized service strategies, regulatory transparency, and targeted promotional efforts. By leveraging real operational data, this study enhances the external validity of trust research in autonomous driving, offering insights for future research on clean energy and shared mobility technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 104393"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925001729","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid development of autonomous driving technology has propelled the emergence of Robotaxi services as a transformative innovation in urban mobility. However, despite technological advances, research on the mechanisms driving user trust and adoption of Robotaxi services remains limited. This study constructs and validates a socio-technical dual-dimensional framework to systematically investigate how social factors (e.g., social influence, policies, and the bandwagon effect) and technological factors (e.g., reliability, assurance, and empathy) jointly influence user trust and adoption decisions. Using structural equation modeling, data were collected through offline surveys from 564 Robotaxi users in operational Robotaxi services in Wuhan, China. The results confirm that trust serves as a key mediator, linking external social and technological factors to user behavior and highlight the strong influence of the bandwagon effect, reliability, and assurance on trust formation. Multi-group analysis reveals significant differences in trust formation across demographics, with women being more sensitive to empathy, men prioritizing responsiveness, and high-income users relying more on regulatory assurance. The findings provide theoretical contributions by expanding the trust mechanism in autonomous mobility services and offer practical implications for Robotaxi operators and policymakers, emphasizing personalized service strategies, regulatory transparency, and targeted promotional efforts. By leveraging real operational data, this study enhances the external validity of trust research in autonomous driving, offering insights for future research on clean energy and shared mobility technologies.
用户为什么信任Robotaxi?从社会技术角度分析用户差异和采用行为
自动驾驶技术的快速发展推动了机器人出租车服务的出现,这是城市交通的变革性创新。然而,尽管技术进步,对驱动用户信任和采用自动驾驶出租车服务的机制的研究仍然有限。本研究构建并验证了一个社会-技术双重维度框架,以系统地研究社会因素(如社会影响、政策和从众效应)和技术因素(如可靠性、保证和同理心)如何共同影响用户信任和采用决策。利用结构方程模型,通过线下调查收集了中国武汉564名Robotaxi服务运营用户的数据。研究结果证实,信任是一个关键的中介,将外部社会和技术因素与用户行为联系起来,并突出了从众效应、可靠性和保证对信任形成的强烈影响。多组分析显示,不同人口统计数据在信任形成方面存在显著差异,女性对同理心更敏感,男性优先考虑响应性,高收入用户更依赖监管保证。研究结果通过扩展自主出行服务中的信任机制提供了理论贡献,并为Robotaxi运营商和政策制定者提供了实践启示,强调个性化服务策略、监管透明度和有针对性的推广工作。通过利用真实运行数据,本研究增强了自动驾驶信任研究的外部有效性,为未来清洁能源和共享出行技术的研究提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信