Does access to credit promote the use of modern energy services? Evidence from rural Nigeria

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Abdou Salam Ndiaye
{"title":"Does access to credit promote the use of modern energy services? Evidence from rural Nigeria","authors":"Abdou Salam Ndiaye","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of access to credit on the adoption of modern energy services among rural households in Nigeria. Using a panel dataset of 3380 households drawn from the General Household Survey (GHS), we apply Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to mitigate potential selection bias and Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimation to address endogeneity concerns. The results reveal that access to credit has a modest yet statistically significant effect on the adoption of modern energy services. Further analysis indicates that this impact is concentrated in the uptake of three basic services: electric lighting, phone charging, and fan ventilation, suggesting that credit is primarily used to finance energy needs considered essential for daily living. Moreover, the source of credit emerges as an important factor, with formal and informal lenders influencing adoption outcomes differently. Beyond financial access, our findings underscore the importance of broader socioeconomic and infrastructural factors. Household wealth is a key determinant of energy service adoption, while the education level of the household head and the type of energy connection (on-grid vs. off-grid) also significantly shape adoption patterns. These insights highlight the multifaceted nature of energy access and suggest that credit interventions alone may be insufficient to drive comprehensive energy transitions in rural contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 108666"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325004931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of access to credit on the adoption of modern energy services among rural households in Nigeria. Using a panel dataset of 3380 households drawn from the General Household Survey (GHS), we apply Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to mitigate potential selection bias and Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimation to address endogeneity concerns. The results reveal that access to credit has a modest yet statistically significant effect on the adoption of modern energy services. Further analysis indicates that this impact is concentrated in the uptake of three basic services: electric lighting, phone charging, and fan ventilation, suggesting that credit is primarily used to finance energy needs considered essential for daily living. Moreover, the source of credit emerges as an important factor, with formal and informal lenders influencing adoption outcomes differently. Beyond financial access, our findings underscore the importance of broader socioeconomic and infrastructural factors. Household wealth is a key determinant of energy service adoption, while the education level of the household head and the type of energy connection (on-grid vs. off-grid) also significantly shape adoption patterns. These insights highlight the multifaceted nature of energy access and suggest that credit interventions alone may be insufficient to drive comprehensive energy transitions in rural contexts.
获得信贷是否促进了现代能源服务的使用?来自尼日利亚农村的证据
本研究考察了获得信贷对尼日利亚农村家庭采用现代能源服务的影响。使用来自综合住户调查(GHS)的3380个家庭的面板数据集,我们应用粗化精确匹配(CEM)来减轻潜在的选择偏差,并应用差中差(DiD)估计来解决内生性问题。结果表明,获得信贷对采用现代能源服务的影响不大,但在统计上具有显著意义。进一步的分析表明,这种影响主要集中在三种基本服务的采用上:照明、电话充电和风扇通风,这表明信贷主要用于为日常生活所必需的能源需求提供资金。此外,信贷来源成为一个重要因素,正规和非正规贷款人对采用结果的影响不同。除了金融渠道之外,我们的研究结果强调了更广泛的社会经济和基础设施因素的重要性。家庭财富是能源服务采用的关键决定因素,而户主的教育水平和能源连接类型(并网与离网)也显著地影响了采用模式。这些见解突出了能源获取的多面性,并表明仅靠信贷干预可能不足以推动农村地区的全面能源转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信