Clinical benefit and cost of plasma-first next-generation sequencing in patients with newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Ireland: The PLAN study

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
David O'Reilly , Anthony O'Grady , Conor Hayes , Laura Piggott , Ruaidhri Keane , Orla M. Fitzpatrick , Michael Conroy , Nicholas Kruseman Aretz , David Synnott , Rachel Dillon , Gavin P. Dowling , Daniel J. Ryan , Emmet O’Brien , Ross Morgan , Oscar Breathnach , Liam Grogan , Patrick Morris , Megan Greally , Minh Yuen Teo , Adrian Murphy , Jarushka Naidoo
{"title":"Clinical benefit and cost of plasma-first next-generation sequencing in patients with newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Ireland: The PLAN study","authors":"David O'Reilly ,&nbsp;Anthony O'Grady ,&nbsp;Conor Hayes ,&nbsp;Laura Piggott ,&nbsp;Ruaidhri Keane ,&nbsp;Orla M. Fitzpatrick ,&nbsp;Michael Conroy ,&nbsp;Nicholas Kruseman Aretz ,&nbsp;David Synnott ,&nbsp;Rachel Dillon ,&nbsp;Gavin P. Dowling ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Ryan ,&nbsp;Emmet O’Brien ,&nbsp;Ross Morgan ,&nbsp;Oscar Breathnach ,&nbsp;Liam Grogan ,&nbsp;Patrick Morris ,&nbsp;Megan Greally ,&nbsp;Minh Yuen Teo ,&nbsp;Adrian Murphy ,&nbsp;Jarushka Naidoo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We report a pilot clinical trial investigating the feasibility of liquid biopsy genotyping (LBG) at the time of radiological suspicion of advanced NSCLC, incorporating a micro-cost model (MCM). (PLAsma Genomic Testing in Advanced NSCLC; The PLAN trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05542485).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with a radiologic suspicion of stage III-IV lung cancer were recruited from four cancer centres in Ireland between August 2023 and July 2024. LBG was performed using the Archer LiquidplexTM NGS assay. The MCM considered staff time, consumables and capital costs and savings from avoidance of repeat tissue biopsy genotyping (TBG) or inappropriate systemic therapy such as immunotherapy for EGFR + NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 138 patients were enrolled in the study with 38 excluded from the primary analysis (Squamous=16; SCLC = 22). Of patients that were eligible, LBG was completed in 100 % (100/100). TBG was completed in 68 % (68/100; insufficient tissue 20 %; 20/100; declining ECOG PS 12 %; 12/100). Repeat tissue biopsies were avoided in 12 % (12/100) of patients due to available LBG reports. The median calendar days from LBG to receipt of genomic report was 21 days shorter for LBG (z = -6.8, p &lt; 0.01) versus TBG, as a median (range: 1–104 days). For evaluable paired cases with both TBG and LBG available (n = 68), concordance was 90 % (61/68). LBG resulted in detection of 5 actionable variants. LBG (€1135) was less than half the cost of TBG (€2404). LBG also resulted in overall cost savings of €20,288 (reduced TBG; use of immunotherapy).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LBG reduces the time to genomic diagnosis in patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC compared to tissue genotyping, identifies actionable variants not reported in tissue, and results in overall cost savings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 115582"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925003648","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We report a pilot clinical trial investigating the feasibility of liquid biopsy genotyping (LBG) at the time of radiological suspicion of advanced NSCLC, incorporating a micro-cost model (MCM). (PLAsma Genomic Testing in Advanced NSCLC; The PLAN trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05542485).

Methods

Patients with a radiologic suspicion of stage III-IV lung cancer were recruited from four cancer centres in Ireland between August 2023 and July 2024. LBG was performed using the Archer LiquidplexTM NGS assay. The MCM considered staff time, consumables and capital costs and savings from avoidance of repeat tissue biopsy genotyping (TBG) or inappropriate systemic therapy such as immunotherapy for EGFR + NSCLC.

Results

A total of 138 patients were enrolled in the study with 38 excluded from the primary analysis (Squamous=16; SCLC = 22). Of patients that were eligible, LBG was completed in 100 % (100/100). TBG was completed in 68 % (68/100; insufficient tissue 20 %; 20/100; declining ECOG PS 12 %; 12/100). Repeat tissue biopsies were avoided in 12 % (12/100) of patients due to available LBG reports. The median calendar days from LBG to receipt of genomic report was 21 days shorter for LBG (z = -6.8, p < 0.01) versus TBG, as a median (range: 1–104 days). For evaluable paired cases with both TBG and LBG available (n = 68), concordance was 90 % (61/68). LBG resulted in detection of 5 actionable variants. LBG (€1135) was less than half the cost of TBG (€2404). LBG also resulted in overall cost savings of €20,288 (reduced TBG; use of immunotherapy).

Conclusions

LBG reduces the time to genomic diagnosis in patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC compared to tissue genotyping, identifies actionable variants not reported in tissue, and results in overall cost savings.
爱尔兰新诊断的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者血浆优先下一代测序的临床效益和成本:PLAN研究
我们报告了一项试点临床试验,研究了在放射学怀疑晚期非小细胞肺癌时采用液体活检基因分型(LBG)的可行性,并结合了微成本模型(MCM)。晚期非小细胞肺癌血浆基因组检测;PLAN试验,ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT05542485)。方法于2023年8月至2024年7月从爱尔兰的四个癌症中心招募放射学怀疑为III-IV期肺癌的患者。LBG采用Archer LiquidplexTM NGS法测定。MCM考虑了员工时间、消耗品和资本成本,以及避免重复组织活检基因分型(TBG)或不适当的全身治疗(如EGFR + NSCLC的免疫治疗)所节省的成本。结果共有138例患者入组,其中38例被排除在初步分析之外(鳞状=16;SCLC = 22)。在符合条件的患者中,LBG的完成率为100% %(100/100)。TBG在68 % (68/100;组织不足20 %;20/100;ECOG PS下降12 %;12/100)。12 %(12/100)的患者由于有可用的LBG报告而避免了重复组织活检。从LBG到收到基因组报告的中位数日历天数中,LBG比TBG短21天(z = -6.8,p <; 0.01),中位数(范围:1-104天)。对于TBG和LBG均可用的可评估配对病例(n = 68),一致性为90 %(61/68)。LBG检测出5种可操作的变异。LBG(1135欧元)的成本不到TBG(2404欧元)的一半。LBG还节省了20288欧元的总成本(减少了TBG;使用免疫疗法)。结论与组织基因分型相比,slbg减少了新诊断NSCLC患者的基因组诊断时间,识别了未在组织中报告的可操作变异,并节省了总体成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer
European Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
953
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信