The Effect of 12-Week e-Cigarette Use on Smoking Abstinence at 1 Year

Kristian B. Filion PhD , Tetiana Zolotarova MD , Andréa Hébert-Losier MSc , Sarah B. Windle MPH , Pauline Reynier MSc , Todd Greenspoon MD , Tim Brandys MD , Tamàs Fülöp MD , Thang Nguyen MD , Stéphane Elkouri MD , Igor Wilderman MD , Olivier F. Bertrand MD , Joanna Alexis Bostwick MD , Yves Lacasse MD , Smita Pakhale MD , Mark J. Eisenberg MD, MPH
{"title":"The Effect of 12-Week e-Cigarette Use on Smoking Abstinence at 1 Year","authors":"Kristian B. Filion PhD ,&nbsp;Tetiana Zolotarova MD ,&nbsp;Andréa Hébert-Losier MSc ,&nbsp;Sarah B. Windle MPH ,&nbsp;Pauline Reynier MSc ,&nbsp;Todd Greenspoon MD ,&nbsp;Tim Brandys MD ,&nbsp;Tamàs Fülöp MD ,&nbsp;Thang Nguyen MD ,&nbsp;Stéphane Elkouri MD ,&nbsp;Igor Wilderman MD ,&nbsp;Olivier F. Bertrand MD ,&nbsp;Joanna Alexis Bostwick MD ,&nbsp;Yves Lacasse MD ,&nbsp;Smita Pakhale MD ,&nbsp;Mark J. Eisenberg MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The current evidence regarding the long-term efficacy of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for smoking cessation is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We randomized 376 adults who smoked ≥10 cigarettes/day and were motivated to quit at 17 Canadian sites to 12 weeks of nicotine (15 mg/mL) e-cigarettes (n = 128), non-nicotine e-cigarettes (n = 127), or no e-cigarettes (n = 121). All groups received individual counseling. The primary endpoint was point prevalence abstinence (7-day recall, biochemically validated using expired carbon monoxide) at 12 weeks. The 52-week follow-up results are reported here.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants (mean age 52 ± 13 years; 47% female) smoked a mean of 21 ± 11 cigarettes/day at baseline. Compared to individual counseling alone, participants randomized to nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling had higher rates of point prevalence (23.6% vs 9.9%; difference: 13.7%; 95% CI: 4.6%-22.8%) and continuous abstinence (3.1% vs 0.0%; difference: 3.1%; 95% CI: 0.1%-6.2%) and greater reductions in the number of cigarettes smoked (−9.5 ± 10.5 vs −5.6 ± 9.5; difference: −3.9; 95% CI: −6.5 to −1.4) at 52 weeks. Benefits were also observed among participants randomized to non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone. No differences in abstinence or reduction were found between nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared to individual counseling alone, short-term use of standardized nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling is efficacious at increasing smoking abstinence at 52 weeks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 6","pages":"Article 101833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25002522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The current evidence regarding the long-term efficacy of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for smoking cessation is unclear.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in the general population.

Methods

We randomized 376 adults who smoked ≥10 cigarettes/day and were motivated to quit at 17 Canadian sites to 12 weeks of nicotine (15 mg/mL) e-cigarettes (n = 128), non-nicotine e-cigarettes (n = 127), or no e-cigarettes (n = 121). All groups received individual counseling. The primary endpoint was point prevalence abstinence (7-day recall, biochemically validated using expired carbon monoxide) at 12 weeks. The 52-week follow-up results are reported here.

Results

Participants (mean age 52 ± 13 years; 47% female) smoked a mean of 21 ± 11 cigarettes/day at baseline. Compared to individual counseling alone, participants randomized to nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling had higher rates of point prevalence (23.6% vs 9.9%; difference: 13.7%; 95% CI: 4.6%-22.8%) and continuous abstinence (3.1% vs 0.0%; difference: 3.1%; 95% CI: 0.1%-6.2%) and greater reductions in the number of cigarettes smoked (−9.5 ± 10.5 vs −5.6 ± 9.5; difference: −3.9; 95% CI: −6.5 to −1.4) at 52 weeks. Benefits were also observed among participants randomized to non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone. No differences in abstinence or reduction were found between nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes.

Conclusions

Compared to individual counseling alone, short-term use of standardized nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling is efficacious at increasing smoking abstinence at 52 weeks.
使用电子烟12周对戒烟1年的影响
目前关于电子烟(电子烟)对戒烟的长期功效的证据尚不清楚。目的本研究的目的是评估尼古丁和非尼古丁电子烟对普通人群戒烟的有效性、安全性和耐受性。方法:我们在加拿大17个地点随机选取376名吸烟≥10支/天的成年人,让他们分别抽含尼古丁(15 mg/mL)的电子烟(n = 128)、不含尼古丁的电子烟(n = 127)或不抽电子烟(n = 121) 12周。所有小组都接受了个别辅导。主要终点是12周时的点流行戒断(7天回忆,使用过期一氧化碳进行生化验证)。52周随访结果见此。结果参与者平均年龄52±13岁;(47%女性)在基线时平均吸烟21±11支/天。与单独的个人咨询相比,随机选择尼古丁电子烟加咨询的参与者有更高的点患病率(23.6% vs 9.9%;区别:13.7%;95% CI: 4.6%-22.8%)和持续戒断(3.1% vs 0.0%;区别:3.1%;95% CI: 0.1%-6.2%)和吸烟数量的更大减少(- 9.5±10.5 vs - 5.6±9.5;区别:−3.9;95% CI:−6.5至−1.4)。在随机选择非尼古丁电子烟加咨询与单独咨询的参与者中也观察到益处。尼古丁电子烟和非尼古丁电子烟在戒烟或减少吸烟方面没有差异。结论短期使用标准尼古丁和非尼古丁电子烟加咨询与单独进行戒烟咨询相比,在52周时戒烟效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC advances
JACC advances Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信