A Survey on the Management and Surveillance of Low-Grade Gastric Adenoma Among Gastroenterologists in South Korea.

Jin Lee, Jae Yong Park, Joon Sung Kim, Young-Il Kim, Hyuk Lee, Su Youn Nam, Ki Taek Nam, Hyo-Joon Yang, Jong Yeul Lee
{"title":"A Survey on the Management and Surveillance of Low-Grade Gastric Adenoma Among Gastroenterologists in South Korea.","authors":"Jin Lee, Jae Yong Park, Joon Sung Kim, Young-Il Kim, Hyuk Lee, Su Youn Nam, Ki Taek Nam, Hyo-Joon Yang, Jong Yeul Lee","doi":"10.7704/kjhugr.2025.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Low-grade gastric adenomas (LGA) are managed using a variety of methods, unlike high-grade adenomas or early gastric cancers, which follow more standardized treatment protocols. This study aimed to assess the current practices and follow-up strategies used by South Korean gastroenterologists in managing LGA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was created with Google Forms and distributed to South Korean gastroenterologists via email or paper instructions containing a Quick Response code.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 South Korean gastroenterologists responded to the survey. The size criteria for endoscopic treatment of LGAs were as follows: size-independent (68.5%), ≥5 mm (13.1%), ≥1 cm (16.2%), ≥1.5 cm (0.8%), and ≥2 cm (1.5%). Treatment decisions, such as performing endoscopic submucosal dissection, were primarily influenced by lesion size (88.5%), endoscopic appearance (62.3%), and location (41.5%). For lesions ≥1.5 cm, 85.3% (n=111) of respondents favored endoscopic submucosal dissection, whereas for lesions ≤1 cm, endoscopic mucosal resection or argon plasma coagulation was preferred. Regarding follow-up endoscopy intervals, most respondents (70.0%) conducted follow-up within 6 months post-endoscopic resection, with subsequent endoscopies at 1-year intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a detailed overview of the current management strategies for LGAs among South Korean gastroenterologists, highlighting the variability in approaches. Further research is required to develop more standardized guidelines for the management and surveillance of LGA.</p>","PeriodicalId":520887,"journal":{"name":"The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research","volume":"25 2","pages":"152-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7704/kjhugr.2025.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Low-grade gastric adenomas (LGA) are managed using a variety of methods, unlike high-grade adenomas or early gastric cancers, which follow more standardized treatment protocols. This study aimed to assess the current practices and follow-up strategies used by South Korean gastroenterologists in managing LGA.

Methods: An online survey was created with Google Forms and distributed to South Korean gastroenterologists via email or paper instructions containing a Quick Response code.

Results: A total of 130 South Korean gastroenterologists responded to the survey. The size criteria for endoscopic treatment of LGAs were as follows: size-independent (68.5%), ≥5 mm (13.1%), ≥1 cm (16.2%), ≥1.5 cm (0.8%), and ≥2 cm (1.5%). Treatment decisions, such as performing endoscopic submucosal dissection, were primarily influenced by lesion size (88.5%), endoscopic appearance (62.3%), and location (41.5%). For lesions ≥1.5 cm, 85.3% (n=111) of respondents favored endoscopic submucosal dissection, whereas for lesions ≤1 cm, endoscopic mucosal resection or argon plasma coagulation was preferred. Regarding follow-up endoscopy intervals, most respondents (70.0%) conducted follow-up within 6 months post-endoscopic resection, with subsequent endoscopies at 1-year intervals.

Conclusions: This study provides a detailed overview of the current management strategies for LGAs among South Korean gastroenterologists, highlighting the variability in approaches. Further research is required to develop more standardized guidelines for the management and surveillance of LGA.

韩国胃肠病学家对低级别胃腺瘤的管理和监测调查。
目的:低级别胃腺瘤(LGA)的治疗方法多种多样,不像高级别腺瘤或早期胃癌,后者遵循更标准化的治疗方案。本研究旨在评估韩国胃肠病学家管理LGA的现行做法和后续策略。方法:使用谷歌表格创建在线调查,并通过电子邮件或包含快速响应代码的纸质说明分发给韩国胃肠病学家。结果:共有130名韩国胃肠病学家参与了调查。内镜下治疗LGAs的尺寸标准为:尺寸无关(68.5%)、≥5 mm(13.1%)、≥1 cm(16.2%)、≥1.5 cm(0.8%)、≥2 cm(1.5%)。病变大小(88.5%)、内镜下外观(62.3%)和位置(41.5%)是影响内镜下粘膜下剥离等治疗决策的主要因素。对于≥1.5 cm的病变,85.3% (n=111)的受访者倾向于内镜下粘膜剥离,而对于≤1 cm的病变,首选内镜下粘膜切除或氩等离子凝固。关于内镜随访时间间隔,大多数受访者(70.0%)在内镜切除后6个月内进行随访,随访时间间隔为1年。结论:本研究提供了韩国胃肠病学家当前LGAs管理策略的详细概述,强调了方法的可变性。需要进一步研究,为管理和监测LGA制定更标准化的准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信