Global trends in the microbial profile of odontogenic infections and its practical implications: A 70-year narrative review.

Ricardo Grillo, Lázaro Caixeta, Mariana Brozoski, Fernando Melhem-Elias
{"title":"Global trends in the microbial profile of odontogenic infections and its practical implications: A 70-year narrative review.","authors":"Ricardo Grillo, Lázaro Caixeta, Mariana Brozoski, Fernando Melhem-Elias","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01425-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Odontogenic infections represent a significant clinical challenge in maxillofacial surgery due to their potential for rapid progression and life-threatening complications. Regional variations in microbial profiles and antibiotic resistance patterns directly influence treatment efficacy, underscoring the necessity for geographically tailored antimicrobial strategies. This study systematically evaluated the global microbial epidemiology of odontogenic infections, analyzing prevalent pathogens, emerging resistance trends, and the clinical effectiveness of current antibiotic regimens across different regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive PubMed search, identifying 162 eligible studies comprising retrospective analyses, case series, clinical trials, and antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Extracted data included microbial identification results, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and geographic variables. Statistical evaluation employed Pearson's correlation coefficients and Kruskal-Wallis tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis encompassed 20,911 patients yielding 61,408 bacterial isolates representing 123 distinct strains. No statistically significant temporal trends in microbial prevalence were detected. Geographic variations significantly affected antibiotic selection, with regional efficacy patterns being particularly evident in severe infections. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and vancomycin demonstrated consistently high susceptibility rates (> 90%), whereas the metronidazole-penicillin combination showed limited efficacy, though this finding was constrained by insufficient data availability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although surgical drainage remains the cornerstone of management, treatment outcomes can be optimized through region-specific antibiotic selection guided by local microbial patterns. Antibiograms, whenever feasible, support targeted therapy, helping address resistance patterns. Optimal antimicrobial stewardship for odontogenic infections requires continuous consideration of evolving regional resistance trends alongside potential therapeutic risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01425-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Odontogenic infections represent a significant clinical challenge in maxillofacial surgery due to their potential for rapid progression and life-threatening complications. Regional variations in microbial profiles and antibiotic resistance patterns directly influence treatment efficacy, underscoring the necessity for geographically tailored antimicrobial strategies. This study systematically evaluated the global microbial epidemiology of odontogenic infections, analyzing prevalent pathogens, emerging resistance trends, and the clinical effectiveness of current antibiotic regimens across different regions.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive PubMed search, identifying 162 eligible studies comprising retrospective analyses, case series, clinical trials, and antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Extracted data included microbial identification results, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and geographic variables. Statistical evaluation employed Pearson's correlation coefficients and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results: The analysis encompassed 20,911 patients yielding 61,408 bacterial isolates representing 123 distinct strains. No statistically significant temporal trends in microbial prevalence were detected. Geographic variations significantly affected antibiotic selection, with regional efficacy patterns being particularly evident in severe infections. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and vancomycin demonstrated consistently high susceptibility rates (> 90%), whereas the metronidazole-penicillin combination showed limited efficacy, though this finding was constrained by insufficient data availability.

Conclusions: Although surgical drainage remains the cornerstone of management, treatment outcomes can be optimized through region-specific antibiotic selection guided by local microbial patterns. Antibiograms, whenever feasible, support targeted therapy, helping address resistance patterns. Optimal antimicrobial stewardship for odontogenic infections requires continuous consideration of evolving regional resistance trends alongside potential therapeutic risks.

牙源性感染微生物分布的全球趋势及其实际意义:70年的叙述回顾。
目的:牙源性感染是颌面外科的一个重大临床挑战,因为它们有可能迅速发展和危及生命的并发症。微生物概况和抗生素耐药模式的区域差异直接影响治疗效果,强调了根据地理位置量身定制抗菌策略的必要性。本研究系统地评估了全球牙源性感染的微生物流行病学,分析了不同地区流行的病原体、新出现的耐药趋势以及当前抗生素方案的临床有效性。方法:我们进行了全面的PubMed检索,确定了162项符合条件的研究,包括回顾性分析、病例系列、临床试验和抗菌药物敏感性试验。提取的数据包括微生物鉴定结果、抗生素敏感性概况和地理变量。统计评价采用Pearson相关系数和Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:该分析包括20,911例患者,产生61,408株细菌,代表123种不同的菌株。没有发现统计学上显著的微生物流行率的时间趋势。地理差异显著影响抗生素的选择,在严重感染中,区域疗效模式尤为明显。阿莫西林-克拉维酸盐和万古霉素表现出一贯的高易感率(约90%),而甲硝唑-青霉素联合用药显示出有限的疗效,尽管这一发现受到数据不足的限制。结论:虽然手术引流仍然是治疗的基石,但可以通过根据当地微生物模式指导区域特异性抗生素选择来优化治疗效果。抗生素图,只要可行,支持靶向治疗,帮助解决耐药模式。牙源性感染的最佳抗菌药物管理需要持续考虑不断变化的区域耐药趋势以及潜在的治疗风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信