Comparative evaluation of different (peripheral defocus based) spectacle designs in preventing myopia progression: A double-blinded randomised clinical trial.

Vinay Gupta, Rohit Saxena, Rebika Dhiman, Swati Phuljhele, Namrata Sharma
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of different (peripheral defocus based) spectacle designs in preventing myopia progression: A double-blinded randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Vinay Gupta, Rohit Saxena, Rebika Dhiman, Swati Phuljhele, Namrata Sharma","doi":"10.1111/opo.13548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different peripheral defocus-based spectacle designs [Defocus Induced Multiple Segment (DIMS), Highly Aspherical Lenslets (HALT) and Cylindrical Annular Refractive Elements (CARE)] in controlling myopia progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, interventional, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial. Children aged 5 to 15 years, with myopia ranging from -1 D to -8 D and documented myopia progression of ≥0.5 D/year, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to wear either DIMS, HALT or CARE spectacles full-time. Cycloplegic refraction and axial length measurements were taken at baseline and after 1 year. The primary outcome was the change in the rate of myopia progression. All analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 participants (40 in each group: DIMS, HALT and CARE) with a mean age of 10.1 ± 3.3 years (57% male) were enrolled. At the 1-year follow-up, the rate of myopia progression reduced by 0.38 ± 0.13 D/year (56.7%), 0.36 ± 0.12 D/year (58.1%) and 0.31 ± 0.15 D/year (47%) for the DIMS, HALT and CARE groups, respectively. The respective change in axial length was 0.2 ± 0.11 mm, 0.19 ± 0.12 mm and 0.23 ± 0.14 mm. Inter-group comparisons showed a significant difference in spherical equivalent refractive error changes between HALT and CARE (p = 0.04) and in the rate of myopia progression between DIMS and CARE (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between HALT and DIMS for any parameter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spectacle lenses incorporating peripheral defocus (DIMS, HALT and CARE) were all effective in reducing the rate of myopia progression significantly, with no adverse effects being observed. Among the three designs, DIMS and HALT exhibited comparable and significantly better efficacy than CARE spectacles at 1 year follow-up. However, further long-term studies are required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different peripheral defocus-based spectacle designs [Defocus Induced Multiple Segment (DIMS), Highly Aspherical Lenslets (HALT) and Cylindrical Annular Refractive Elements (CARE)] in controlling myopia progression.

Methods: This was a prospective, interventional, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial. Children aged 5 to 15 years, with myopia ranging from -1 D to -8 D and documented myopia progression of ≥0.5 D/year, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to wear either DIMS, HALT or CARE spectacles full-time. Cycloplegic refraction and axial length measurements were taken at baseline and after 1 year. The primary outcome was the change in the rate of myopia progression. All analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle.

Results: A total of 120 participants (40 in each group: DIMS, HALT and CARE) with a mean age of 10.1 ± 3.3 years (57% male) were enrolled. At the 1-year follow-up, the rate of myopia progression reduced by 0.38 ± 0.13 D/year (56.7%), 0.36 ± 0.12 D/year (58.1%) and 0.31 ± 0.15 D/year (47%) for the DIMS, HALT and CARE groups, respectively. The respective change in axial length was 0.2 ± 0.11 mm, 0.19 ± 0.12 mm and 0.23 ± 0.14 mm. Inter-group comparisons showed a significant difference in spherical equivalent refractive error changes between HALT and CARE (p = 0.04) and in the rate of myopia progression between DIMS and CARE (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between HALT and DIMS for any parameter.

Conclusions: Spectacle lenses incorporating peripheral defocus (DIMS, HALT and CARE) were all effective in reducing the rate of myopia progression significantly, with no adverse effects being observed. Among the three designs, DIMS and HALT exhibited comparable and significantly better efficacy than CARE spectacles at 1 year follow-up. However, further long-term studies are required to validate these findings.

不同(基于外周离焦的)眼镜设计在预防近视进展中的比较评价:一项双盲随机临床试验。
目的:本研究旨在评价和比较不同外周离焦眼镜设计[离焦诱导多段(DIMS),高度非球面透镜(HALT)和圆柱环形屈光片(CARE)]控制近视进展的效果。方法:这是一项前瞻性、介入性、双盲、随机临床试验。年龄在5至15岁之间,近视范围为-1 D至-8 D,且记录的近视进展≥0.5 D/年的儿童被随机分配(1:1:1),全天佩戴DIMS、HALT或CARE眼镜。在基线和1年后测量睫状体麻痹的屈光和轴长。主要结果是近视进展率的变化。所有分析均基于意向治疗原则进行。结果:共入组120例(每组40例:DIMS、HALT和CARE),平均年龄10.1±3.3岁(57%为男性)。随访1年时,DIMS组、HALT组和CARE组的近视进展率分别降低了0.38±0.13 D/年(56.7%)、0.36±0.12 D/年(58.1%)和0.31±0.15 D/年(47%)。轴向长度变化分别为0.2±0.11 mm、0.19±0.12 mm和0.23±0.14 mm。组间比较显示,HALT组和CARE组的球面等效屈光差变化(p = 0.04)和DIMS组和CARE组的近视进展率(p = 0.04)差异有统计学意义。在HALT和DIMS之间没有发现任何参数的显著差异。结论:结合周边离焦的眼镜镜片(DIMS、HALT和CARE)均可显著降低近视进展率,未观察到不良反应。在三种设计中,DIMS和HALT在1年随访时表现出相当且显著优于CARE眼镜的疗效。然而,需要进一步的长期研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信