The World Needs a PEPP Policy that Addresses Biosafety Loopholes Highlighted by the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Alina Chan
{"title":"The World Needs a PEPP Policy that Addresses Biosafety Loopholes Highlighted by the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Alina Chan","doi":"10.1089/apb.2024.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The new U.S. government policy for oversight of dual-use research of concern and pathogens with enhanced pandemic potential (PEPP) focuses on federally funded research projects that are predicted by the funding applicant to have a nontrivial likelihood of generating a PEPP. This leaves a considerable gap in oversight of nonfederally funded work and research on novel pathogens. The prediction of pandemic risk arising from novel experiments is difficult even for multidisciplinary teams of experts, and a self-reporting system is inadequate as evidenced by past incidents. Creating an independent organization for oversight, inspection, and investigation of research projects regardless of funding source will ensure consistency and transparency in policy implementation and help to build knowledge and best practices for mitigating the risks of accidental outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":520561,"journal":{"name":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","volume":"30 2","pages":"146-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2024.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The new U.S. government policy for oversight of dual-use research of concern and pathogens with enhanced pandemic potential (PEPP) focuses on federally funded research projects that are predicted by the funding applicant to have a nontrivial likelihood of generating a PEPP. This leaves a considerable gap in oversight of nonfederally funded work and research on novel pathogens. The prediction of pandemic risk arising from novel experiments is difficult even for multidisciplinary teams of experts, and a self-reporting system is inadequate as evidenced by past incidents. Creating an independent organization for oversight, inspection, and investigation of research projects regardless of funding source will ensure consistency and transparency in policy implementation and help to build knowledge and best practices for mitigating the risks of accidental outbreaks.

世界需要一项解决COVID-19大流行突出的生物安全漏洞的公私合作政策。
美国政府关于监督双重用途研究的新政策和具有增强大流行潜力的病原体(PEPP)的重点是由联邦资助的研究项目,这些研究项目由资助申请人预测有很大可能产生PEPP。这在监督非联邦资助的工作和对新型病原体的研究方面留下了相当大的空白。即使是多学科专家小组也很难预测由新实验引起的大流行风险,而且过去的事件证明,自我报告系统是不够的。建立一个独立的组织,对研究项目进行监督、检查和调查,无论其资金来源如何,这将确保政策执行的一致性和透明度,并有助于积累知识和最佳做法,以减轻意外爆发的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信